Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06349-02
Original file (06349-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

NAVY 

ANNEX

2 

WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100

JLP: ddj
Docket No: 6349-02
14 January 2003

This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
session, considered your application on 14 January 2003. Your allegations of error and injustice
were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the
proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your
application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
opinion furnished by CNO memorandum 5420  
of which is attached.

In addition, the Board considered the advisory

N130D102U0736  of 19 December 2002, a copy

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in
the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and votes of
the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this regard, it is important
to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

Consequently,

Sincerely,

W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director

Enclosure

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

OFFICE OF THE CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS

2000  NAVY PENTAGON

WASHINGTON. D.C. 20350-2000

IN REPLY

5420
N13 
19 

OD/
Dee

MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF

NAVAL RECORDS

Subj:

E CASE OF PETTY OFFICER

Encl:

1.

(1)  BCNR case file  

#06349-02  with microfiche service record

The following provides comment and recommendation on Petty Officer

petition.

N130 recommends denial of Petty Officer

2.
Enlistment Bonus (EB).

's petition for an

(DEP)  and volunteered for the Seal Challenge

in the Navy through the Delayed

-

enlisted

Petty Officer

3.
Entry Program  
Program/Interior Communication Electrician.
he was found unsuitable for the Seal Challenge
Communication Electrician and was reclassified
Electrician 
(AE)  program with a $7,000 EB. In
Officer 
the original amount of EB of $10,000.

-requests  favorable action that

During Recruit Training,

Program/Interior
to the Aviation
his petition, Petty
would allow payment

REFER TO

02UO736
2002

of

EB is only offered to members during the DEP or the reclassification

At no other time may a member petition for
EB payments are contingent upon qualification in the program for

4.
phase of recruit training.
an EB.
which the EB was offered and continuation in that rate for the entirety
of the enlistment contract. Petty Officer
received an EB
contract upon entry into the DEP.
Program with a  $7,000 EB.

He was paid his EB on 29 March 01.

He reclassified at  

RTC  into the  AE

5.
Petty Officer
that he did not n
already had his college degree.
of those that promised Petty Officer
the Inspector General for investigation.

states that he was told by his recruiter
ign up for the Montgomery GI Bill since he

Comments

ertaining to the integrity
a bonus are deferred to

BCNR case file with microfiche service record is returned herewith

6.
as enclosure (1).



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05843-00

    Original file (05843-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 03 April 2001. D.C. 20350-2000 IN REPLY REFER TO 5420 N130Dl/OlU0077 6 MAR 2001 MEMORANDUM FOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS Subj: COMMENT AND RECOMMENDATION IN THE CASE OF PETTY OFFICER Encl: (1) BCNR case file #05843-00 with microfiche service record The following provides comment and recommendation Petty 1 . petition for Petty...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03204-01

    Original file (03204-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 September 2001. D.C. 20350-200 N 0 T O IN REPLY REFER 5420 N130D1/01U1171 2 Aug 2001 MEMORANDUM FOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS Subj : OF PETTY OFFICER Encl: (1) BCNR case file #03204-01 with microfiche service record The following provides comment and recommendation on Petty 1 . an Enlistment Bonus (EB).

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00593-01

    Original file (00593-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNO memorandum 5420 N of which is attached. N130 recommends denial of Petty Officer 2. petition for an Enlistment Bonus (EB) . In his Id requests favorable action as disenrolled from he Electronics EB is not an entitlement, but a recruiting tool used at the Members who fail to complete basic including failure to graduate from and who do not continue in the skill for which The Navy offers an 4. discretion of recruiters and...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04578-01

    Original file (04578-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    D.C. 20350-2000 IN REPLY REFER TO 5420 N130Dl/ 12 Sep 2001 OlU1248 MEMORANDUM FOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS Subj : Encl: record COMMENT AND RECOMMENDATION IN THE CASE OF PETTY OFFICER USN (1) BCNR case file #04578-01 with microfiche service The following provides comment and recommendation on Petty 1. Office N130 recommends denial of Petty Officer-petition for 2. an Enlistment Bonus (EB) as he has already received his EB. and the day a member ships to active...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08167-01

    Original file (08167-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and In addition, the Board considered the advisory applicable statutes, regulations and policies. '/Q2W%WTo MEMORANDUM FOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS Subj : COMMENT AND RECOMMENDATION IN THE CASE OF PETTY OFFICER Encl: record ( 1 ) BCNR case file #08167-01 with microfiche service ing provides comment and...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02407-02

    Original file (02407-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 December 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. D.C. 20370-5000 IN REPLY REFER TO 5420 1113 22 Nov 2002 OD/02U0660 MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07573-00

    Original file (07573-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 August 2001. 20350-2000 N S IN REPLY REFER TO 5420 N13;ql~‘~~;;~~~ MEMORANDUM FOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS Subj : COMMENT AND RECOMMENDATION IN THE CASE OF PETTY OFFICER Encl: (1) BCNR case file #07573-00 with microfiche service record 1. Officer‘- requests that his contract be rewritten and favorable action that would 1160.6A,...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02895-02

    Original file (02895-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNO memorandum which is attached. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. an Enlistment Bonus (EB).

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07284-02

    Original file (07284-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 November 2002. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNO memorandum 5420 N which is attached. An EB College Kicker is an EB and is governed Every recruit is not offered nor Navy Recruiting Command and the Seaman Apprentice Garcia has a valid EB Contract in the amount 5 .

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06671-02

    Original file (06671-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 November 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. COMMENT AND RECOMMENDATION CASE OF SEAMAN