Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04584-02
Original file (04584-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX

WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 JLP:ddj
Docket No: 4584-02
14 January 2003

 

 

This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
session, considered your application on 14 January 2003. Your allegations of error and injustice
were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the
proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your
application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and

applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory
opinion furnished by NPC memorandum 5420 N130D2/02U0737 of 19 December 2002, a copy

of which is attached.

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in
the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and votes of
the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this regard, it is important
to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records. Consequently,
when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

Sincerely,

W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director

Enclosure
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
CHIEF OF NAVAL PERSONNEL
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20370-5000 IN REPLY REFER TO

5420

N13 0D2 / 0200737
19 Dec 2002

 

MEMORANDUM FOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF
NAVAL RECORDS

Subj: COMMENT. |

        

ND RECOMMENDATION IN THE CASE OF PETTY OFFICER

Encl: (1) BCNR case file #04584-02 with microfiche service record

Following provides comment and recommendation on Petty

Officer MIImgm ool tion.

2. N130 recommends denial of Petty Officer —qgimggiiepetition for
an Enlistment Bonus (EB) in the amount of $12,000.

 

3. Petty Officer gyal entered the Delayed Entry Program (DEP)

on 9 June 2000 and signed an EB contract in the amount of $12,000
for enlisting in the Nuclear Field Program. He shipped to active
duty on 29 August 2000. In accordance with BUPERS message
231454AUG99, (message in effect at the time Petty Officer Siienaiaie..
entered the DEP), the NF Program Was eligible for an EB of $8,000
during the period Petty Officer #a : shipped to active duty.

In his petition, Petty Officer,
that will allow payment of the f

   
 

Mtequests favorable action
the amount of $12,000.

4. EB eligible ratings and award levels are announced by OPNAV
(GENADMIN) messages. The message in effect the day a member
enters the DEP and the day the member ships to active duty,
determines the amount of EB a member is eligible to receive. The
Navy classifier erroneously offered a $12,000 EB award level (not
authorized by the EB message in effect at time he entered the
DEP) on his Enlistment Guarantees Contract. Petty Officer Sie

has received the entire $8,000, the amount he is entitled to. No
further action necessary.

5. BCNR case file with microfiche service record is returned
herewith as enclosure (1).

   

Program Analyst,
Programs Branch

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 04123-03

    Original file (04123-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. 20350-200 Y IN REPLY REFER TO: 5420 N130D1/03U0651 10 Sep 2003 MEMORANDUM FOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS Subj: COMMENT AND RECOMMENDATION IN THE CASE OF PETTY OFFICER Encl: (1) BCNR case file #0412,3-03 with microfiche service record ng provides comment and...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01330-01

    Original file (01330-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    D.C. 20350-2000 Y REFER TO IN REPLY 5420 N130Dl/ OlU1104 22 Jun 01 MEMORANDUM FOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS Subj : COMMENT AND RECOMMENDATION IN THE CASE OF PETTY OFFICER L Encl: (1) BCNR case file #01330-01 with microfiche service record The following provides comment and recommendation on Petty 1. shipped to Active Petty Officer In his petition, Petty Office - V According EB eligible ratings and award levels are announced 4. to GENADMIN 31111472 JUL 98...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04588-02

    Original file (04588-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 ‘I JLP: ddj Docket No: 4588-02 8 October 2002 This is in reference provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552. to.your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 October 2002. were reviewed in accordance with administrative...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 05688-03

    Original file (05688-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 October 2003. 03UO658 5420 N130D1/ 10 Sep 2003 MEMORANDUM FOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, NAVAL RECORDS BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF Subj : E OF PETTY OFFICER Encl: (1) BCNR case file #05688-03 with microfiche service record provides comment and recommendation on petition. enters the DEP and the day the member ships to active duty, determines the amount of EB a member is...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2004 | 09649-04

    Original file (09649-04.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. The following provides comment and recommendation on petition.2. In accordance with reference (a) EB entitlement for members enrolled in the CASH program will be based on the date the member reports to RTC and the EB message in effect at the time of DEP enlistment.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08732-00

    Original file (08732-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-510 0 JLP: ddj Docket No: 8732-00 15 November 2001 This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552. A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, Your allegations of error and injustice were considered your application on reviewed in...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08167-01

    Original file (08167-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and In addition, the Board considered the advisory applicable statutes, regulations and policies. '/Q2W%WTo MEMORANDUM FOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS Subj : COMMENT AND RECOMMENDATION IN THE CASE OF PETTY OFFICER Encl: record ( 1 ) BCNR case file #08167-01 with microfiche service ing provides comment and...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05754-02

    Original file (05754-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNO memorandum 5420 which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. NAV Y IN REPLY REFER TO 5420 N130D1/02U0587 29 Ott 2002 MEMORANDUM FOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS Subj: RECOMMENDATION SE OF PETTY OFFICER \ Encl: (1) BCNR case file #05754-02 with...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 05512-03

    Original file (05512-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 21 October 2003. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material 'error or injustice. In accordance with BUPERS message 2011002 JUL 01 (message in effect at the time entering the Nuclear Field program and shipping to active duty between December 2001 and May...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04578-01

    Original file (04578-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    D.C. 20350-2000 IN REPLY REFER TO 5420 N130Dl/ 12 Sep 2001 OlU1248 MEMORANDUM FOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS Subj : Encl: record COMMENT AND RECOMMENDATION IN THE CASE OF PETTY OFFICER USN (1) BCNR case file #04578-01 with microfiche service The following provides comment and recommendation on Petty 1. Office N130 recommends denial of Petty Officer-petition for 2. an Enlistment Bonus (EB) as he has already received his EB. and the day a member ships to active...