Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04268-02
Original file (04268-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

2 NAVY ANNEX

WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100

JLP:ddj
Docket No: 4268-02
3 December 2002

This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
session, considered your application on 3 December 2002. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable
to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
In addition, the Board considered the advisory
opinion furnished by CNO memorandum 5420  
which is attached.

N130D1/02U0423 of 9 August 2002, a copy of

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in
the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and votes of
the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this regard, it is important
to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all
when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

ofticial records. Consequently,

 

Sincerely,

W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director

Enclosure

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

OFFICE OF THE CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS

2000  NAVY PENTAGO

N

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20350-2000

IN REPLY REFER TO

542 0
N13 
9 Aug 

OD1/02UO423

20Me

MEMORANDUM FOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF

NAVAL RECORDS

Subj 

:

COMMENT AND RECOMMENDATION IN THE CASE OF SEAMAN

Encl:

(1) BCNR case file  

#4268-02  with microfiche service record

The following provides comment and recommendation on Seaman

1.
Reeves's petition.

N130 recommends denial of Seaman Reeves's petition for an

2.
Enlistment Bonus (EB) College Kicker.

entered the Delayed Entry Program (DEP) on 13
teered  for the Submarine Electronics Computer

Field School Guarantee Program,
amount of $13,000. He
on 2 May 
would allow payment of an EB College
EB that is included in his contract.

Seaman

2001.

and signed an EB contract in the
to Recruit Training Command (RTC)
requests.favorable

 action that
Kicker in addition to the

EB is not an entitlement, but a recruiting tool used at the

4.
discretion of recruiters and classifiers to entice individuals to
enlist in critical skills.
quotas provided by the Commander,
Enlisted Community Managers, not by the number of "A" School
accession seats.
under the preceding rules.
receives an EB or an EB College Kicker.

An EB College Kicker is an EB and is governed

Every recruit is not offered nor

The EB program is budgeted based on

Navy Recruiting Command and the

5. EB eligible ratings and award levels are announced by OPNAV
The message in effect the day a member
(GENADMIN)  messages.
enters the DEP and the day the member ships to RTC (Recruit
determines the amount of EB a member is
Training Command),
eligible to receive.
FEB 01 (message in effect at the time Seaman
DEP),
Computer Field Program,
of February and Ma
$13,000. Seaman
accordance with his contract.

qualifies for an EB of $13,000 in

a member volunteering for the

and shipping to RTC between the months

In accordance with BUPERS message 0616302

was eligible for an EB at the award level of

Submarine

Electronics

entered the

In an earlier case,

Seaman- applied to the Board for
6 .
Correction of Naval Records, Docket No. 8545-01, to have his
enlistment rate changed from El to E3 in light of the 139
college credits which he had earned prior to his enlistment. At
that time he indicated he had told his recruiter that he had
college credits prior to his enlisting, however the recruiter
did not annotate this college experience in his initial
processing record.
correction of Seaman
of 13 April 2001 is in 

On 16 January 2002,

paygrade  E3.

the Board approved the

record to show that the enlistment

Seaman

has a valid EB Contract in the amount of

7.
$13,000 and is entitled to that payment upon completion of his
training pipeline and qualification in the skill for which he
was offered the EB.
because it was not offered by his classifier nor included in his
contract upon entrance into the Navy.
No further action is
necessary.

He is not entitled to an EB College Kicker

BCNR case file with microfiche service record is returned

8.
herewith as enclosure (1).

Head,
Programs Branch

Enlisted Bonus



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 00249-02

    Original file (00249-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 November 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNO memorandum 5420 which is attached.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06671-02

    Original file (06671-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 November 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. COMMENT AND RECOMMENDATION CASE OF SEAMAN

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02811-02

    Original file (02811-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 September 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and In addition, the Board considered the advisory applicable statutes, regulations and policies. An EB College Kicker is an EB and is governed Every recruit is not offered nor The EB program is...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07000-02

    Original file (07000-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 November 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. 2002. that would allow payment of an $8,000 He shipped to Recruit T In his petition, Seaman 2001, and signed contract for a volunteered for the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07147-02

    Original file (07147-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and In addition, the Board considered the advisory applicable statutes, regulations and policies. N130 recommends denial of Seaman Apprentice 2. petition for an Enlistment Bonus (EB) College Ki of $3,000. He shipped to Recruit Training Command (RTC) on 1 e entered the Navy through the 29 March 2002, volunteered for the Seaman Apprentice...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07383-02

    Original file (07383-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNO memorandum 5420 which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. 20350-2000 54rQl@PLV REFER TO N130D1/02U0589 29 Ott 2002 MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, NAVAL RECORDS BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF Subj : HE CASE 0 Encl: (1) BCNR case file #07383-02 with microfiche service...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07068-01

    Original file (07068-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    D.C. 20350-2000 IN REPLY REFER TO 542 0 N130Dl/ 7 May 2002 02UO198 MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS Subj: COMMENT AND RECOMMENDATION IN THE CASE OF PETTY OFFICER Encl: (1) BCNR case file #07068-01 with microfiche service record 1. entered the Delayed Entry Program , volunteered for the Advanced Command (RTC) on 22 September 2000. requests favorable action that'would allow payment of an Petty Officer EB College Kicker in addition to the EB that is...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06320-02

    Original file (06320-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 December 2002. D.C. 20370-5000 IN REPLY REFER TO 542 0 N13 22 Nov 2002 OD/02U0651 MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS Subj : IN THE CASE OF Encl: (1) BCNR case file #06320-02 with microfiche service record - 1. Recruit Training Command (RTC) on 17 December 2001. petition, payment of a $3,000 Seaman Bryant requests...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02407-02

    Original file (02407-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 December 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. D.C. 20370-5000 IN REPLY REFER TO 5420 1113 22 Nov 2002 OD/02U0660 MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 00320-03

    Original file (00320-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 April 2003. D.C. 20350-2000 IN R E P L Y R E F E R TO 5420 N13 OD1 / 0 3 ~ 0 2 4 5 26 Mar 2003 MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS Subj: COMMENT AND RECOMMENDATION IN THE CASE OF SEAMAN APPRENTICE . In his petition, Seaman Apprentice a requests favorable action that would allow payment of a $2,000 EB College Kicker.