Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02889-02
Original file (02889-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENTOFTHE NAVY

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD

NAVY 

ANNEX

2 

WASHINGTON DC 20370.510

0

S

JLP: ddj
Docket No: 2889-02
20 August 2002

This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
session, considered your application on 20 August 2002.
were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the
proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your
application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
opinion furnished by CDR NAVRESFOR memorandum 1780 Ser
copy of which is attached.

In addition, the Board considered the advisory

N12/636 of 31 July 2002, a

Your allegations of error and injustice

 

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in
the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and votes of
the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

In this regard, it is important
Consequently,

Sincerely,

W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director

Enclosure

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

COMMANDER NAVAL RESERVE FORCE

4400 

DAUPHINE STREET

NEW ORLEANS LOUISIANA

 

70146-5016

 

:

Naval Reserve Force
Commander,
Board for Correction of Naval Records

Ser 
3 

N12/ 
1 JUL 2002

63 6 

ESCNR

 Docket 02889-02

(a) 
(b) Defense Manpower Data Center (DMDC) Database
(c) COMNAVRESFORINST  

1780.1A

i<'rom
TO:

Subj:

Ref:

1.

Commander

Reserve benefits reinstated.

Naval Reserve Force does not support-

request to have her Montgomery GI Bill Selective

.

L 

Reference (b

-,
established for
while a member of
she transferred directly to the Naval Reserve.
Naval Reserve continued her eligibility for MGIB-SR.

Coast

the

Guard Reserve.

Per reference (c),

3.
delimiting date for us
Therefore,
benefits.

she is no longer eligible for further MGIB-SR

for the MGIB-SR was

on April 3, 1991,
On December 16, 1996,
At that time the

10 year
1 3, 2001.

Point of contact is NC

4.
DSN 678-6649.

at commercial (504) 678-6649 or

By direction



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 01444-02

    Original file (01444-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 September 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 01790-05

    Original file (01790-05.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNRFC 1100 Ser N1C2/730 of 22 Aug 05, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 01045-05

    Original file (01045-05.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    1045-0530 August 2005This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of 10 USC 1552.A three-member panel of the Board for correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 30 August 2005. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 06634-01

    Original file (06634-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by COMNAVRESFOR memorandum 1133 Ser copy of which is attached. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07238-02

    Original file (07238-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with al material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulatio opinion furnished attached. Consequently, naval record, the burden is on the applicant to robable material error or injustice. nlisted via the Accelerated Initial Accession the Advanced Pay Grade mporary e Army Reserve, vice Veteran e, however, e. she should have been accessed (OSVET) program or Prior Service her ASVAB...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 03604-07

    Original file (03604-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC memo 1780 PERS-352G of 5 Jun 07, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, a majority of the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Per reference (c), members who initially entered active duty after 30 June 1985 and immediately enrolled in the MGIB Program, are eligible to...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 05957-07

    Original file (05957-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100DJC Docket No. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.Sincerely,W.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 04352-03

    Original file (04352-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 October 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 04330-03

    Original file (04330-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY B O A R D F O R C O R R E C T I O N O F NAVAL R E C O R D S 2 NAVY ANNEX W A S H I N G T O N D C 2 0 3 7 0 - 5 1 0 0 JLP:ecb Docket No: 4330-03 15 October 2003 Dear SEAMAN- This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04652-02

    Original file (04652-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 August 2002. were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. he Page 13 entry on her MGIB...