Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02602-02
Original file (02602-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT  OF  THE  NAVY 

B O A R D   F O R   C O R R E C T I O N   O F   N A V A L   R E C O R D S  

2   N A V Y   A N N E X  

W A S H I N G T O N   D C   2 0 3 7 0 - 5 1 0 0  

ELP 
Docket No.  2602-02 
15 April 2002 

This is in response to your Application for Correction of 
Military Records requesting that the a nonjudicial 
punishment be removed from your Federal Bureau of 
Investigation  (FBI) record. 

The Board has no authority to correct FBI records.  The 
policy of that agency is that it will not correct a record 
unless requested to do so by  the reporting activity.  In 
your case, the Naval Criminal Investigative Service 
apparently fingerprinted you on about 2 February 1999 as a 
result of charges filed against you for an orders 
violation, making false official statement, and larceny of 
$9,800.  You received nonjudicial punishment  (NJP) on 
30 April  1999 and were reduced in rate to MME'N  (E-3) and 
restricted for a period of 45 days.  Although your record 
reflects two other NJPs, this particular NJP is not on file 
on the microfiche. 

Regulations require the NCIS to file a FBI/DOJ Form FD-24 
(fingerprint card) and a final disposition report FBI/DOJ 
Form R-84  on individuals who commit certain offenses under 
the Uniform Code of Military Justice to the FBI.  False 
official statements and larceny are included in a list of 
47 other offenses that must be reported, whether adjudi- 
cated at NJP or court-martial. 

You are advised that when seeking employment in which a 
security clearance is required, both your FBI and Naval 

r e c o r d s   w i l l   reviewed.  The  two  o t h e r   NJPs  i n  y o u r   r e c o r d  
may  a l s o   a d v e r s e l y   i m p a c t   on  whether  you  would  be  h i r e d   f o r  
a  p o s i t i o n   r e q u i r i n g   a  s e c u r i t y  c l e a r a n c e .  

S i n c e   i t  a p p e a r s   t h a t   t h e r e   i s  no  a c t i o n   t h e   Board  c a n  
t a k e ,   y o u r   case  i s  b e i n g   a d m i n i s t r a t i v e l y   c l o s e d   w i t h o u t  
a c t i o n .  

S i n c e r e l y ,  

W.  DEAN  PFEIFFER 
E x e c u t i v e   D i r e c t o r  



Similar Decisions

  • AF | DRB | CY2007 | FD2006-00362

    Original file (FD2006-00362.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 3 Nuv 9 2 , you were i n v i o l a t i o n of AFR 35-10. r e c e i v e d a L e t t e r of C o u n s e l i n g on 6 Nov 92 (Tab 1 - 1 0 ) . You must consult legal counsel before making a daei~ion to waive any of your rights. 23 Aug 9 1 , LOR/UIF; 2 J u l 92, MFR: 22 Sep 9 2 , LOC; 6 Oct 9 2 , LOC; 13 Gct 9 2 , LOR; 16 Oct 9 2 , LOC; 28 Oct 92, LOR/UIF/Control Roster; 2 Nov 9 2 , LOR; 4 Nov 92, MFR; 6 Nov 9 2 , LOC; 12 Nov 92, LOR 2 .

  • AF | DRB | CY2005 | FD2005-00121

    Original file (FD2005-00121.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    + CHANGE REASON AND AUTHORITY TO SECRETARIAL AUTHORITY C - - - I INDORSEnlENT ... SAFIMRBR 550 C STREET WEST, SUITE 40 RANDOLPH AFB, TX 78150-4742 -- I DATE: 10131'2005 SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE PERSONNEL COUNCIL AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD 1535 COMMAND D R EE WING, 3RD FLOOR ANDREWS AFB, MD 20762-7002 FROM: I AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00 (EF-V2) Previous edition will be used 1 1 I I I AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE CASE NUMBER FD-2005-00 164 GENERAL: The applicant...

  • AF | DRB | CY2001 | FD01-00050

    Original file (FD01-00050.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE CASE NUMBER FD-01-00050 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to Honorable. SERVICE UNDER REVIEW: a. Enld as AB 86/05/12 for 4 yrs. Return the case t o t h e squadron f o r processing under a more appropriate p r o v i s i on; c. Discharge t h e respondent with a general discharge, w i t h o r without suspension for probation and r e h a b i l i t a t i o n ; .___ -_ d. Forward your recommendation f o r an honorable...

  • AF | DRB | CY2004 | FD2002-00012

    Original file (FD2002-00012.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    I * 1 NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE, INITIAL) AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD TYPE GEN ' PERSONAL APPEARANCE NAME O F COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION YES No X I I MEMBER SITTING , HoN VOTEOFTHEBOARD GEN / UOTHC I OTHER I DENY GRADE *LC RECORD REVIEW X ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION O F COUNSEL I I I ~ ISSUES A94.05 I INDEX NUMBER A67.30 HEARING DATE CASE NUMBER I 1 I I I EXHIBITS S U B M m D 'SO TL;IE BOARD I I ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF...

  • AF | DRB | CY2006 | FD2005-00319

    Original file (FD2005-00319.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The records indicated thc applicant received an Article 15 for misconduct. I am recommending your discharge f r o m t h e United S t a t e s Air Force f o r drug abuse according t o AFR 39-10, under t h e p r o v i s i o n s o f paragraphs 5-49d and 5- 50.1. Present your case t o an a d m i n i s t r a t i v e discharge board; c ; Be represented by l e g a l counsel a t a board hearing; d, Submit statements the board hearing; i n your own behalf i n a d d i t i o n t o , o r i n l f e u o f , e .

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04637-01

    Original file (04637-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In the absence of evidence which demonstrates that you were unfit for duty at the time of your discharge, the Board was unable to recommend any corrective action in your case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. 0 2 M A Y 1 9 9 6 DATE MEMBER'S STATEMENT OF UNDERSTANDING: I UNDERSTAND THAT THE RECOMMENDED F I N D I N G OF F I T FOR DUTY I S S U B J E C T...

  • AF | DRB | CY2007 | FD2006-00246

    Original file (FD2006-00246.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE CASE NIJMBER FD-2006-00246 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable, to change the reasoil and authority for the discharge, and to change the reenlistment code. Attachment Examiner's Brief DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD ' ANDREWS AFB, MD (Former AB) (HGH SRA) 1. :to steal lawful United States Specification: Did, at or near Dover AFB, Delaware, between on or about 19 Mar 96 and on...

  • AF | DRB | CY2004 | FD2002-00153

    Original file (FD2002-00153.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD Advise applicant of the decision of the Board. 550 C STREET WEST, SUITE 40 RANDOLPH AFB TX 78 150-4742 SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE PERSONNEL COUNCIL AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD 1535 COMMAND DR. EE WING, 3RD FLOOR ANDREWS AFB, MD 20762-7002 AFHQ FORM 872077, JAN 00 ': (EF-V2) Previous edition will be used AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE CASE NUMBER FD-2002-0153 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to...

  • AF | DRB | CY2007 | FD2006-00385

    Original file (FD2006-00385.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    He was administratively disciplined for failing dorm room inspections, failing to maintain proper standards of personal hygiene and cleanliness, failure to go, and operating a vehicle without insurance or current registration. DD Form 214 APPLICATION FOR THE REVIEW OF DISCHARGE FROM THE ARMED FORCES OF THE UNITED STATES (Piease read Instnrcrions on Pages 3 and 4 BEFORE completing this application.) As a r e s u l t , your v e h i c l e was impounded and you r e c e i v e d a L e t t e r o...

  • AF | DRB | CY2001 | FD01-00055

    Original file (FD01-00055.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE I CASE NUMBER FD-01-00055 I GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable. - The Board finds the applicant submitted no issues contesting the equity or propriety of the discharge, and after a thorough review of the record, the Board was unable to identify any. As a result, YOU received a letter of counseling, dated 21 Mar 89. e. On or about 21 Mar 8 9 , at Yokota AB, Japan, you failed to go to your scheduled...