ORCANI7AT
MEMBER SITTING
INDEX NVRIRER
dvise applicant of the decision of the Board, the right to a personal appearance with/without counsel, and the right to
ubmit an application to the AFRCMR.
ames and votes will be made available to the applicant at the applicant's request.
550 C STREET' WESI-. SUITE 40
RANDOlPH AFR, TX 78150-4742
NEL COUNCIL
AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00
(EF-V2)
Previous edition will be used
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOAR11 DECISIONAL RATIONALE
CASE NlJMBER
FD-ZU05-U0319
GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable, change the reason and authority
for the discharge, and to change the reenlistment code.
The applicant was offered a personal appearance before the Discharge Review Hoard ( D m ) but declined to
exercise this right.
The attached brief contains available pertinent data on the applicant and the factors leading to the discharge.
FINDINGS: Upgrade of discharge, change of reason and authority for discharge, and change of reenlistment
code are denied.
The Board finds that neither the evidence of record nor that provided by the applicant substantiates an
inequity or impropriety that would justify a changc of discharge.
ISSUES:
Issue 1. Applicant contends discharge should be upgraded because he wants to reenlist and has learned his
lesson. The records indicated thc applicant received an Article 15 for misconduct. The misconduct includcd
stealing a bottle of f Ialcion pills, a Schcdule IV controlled substance, from the United States Air Force,
ingesting the IIalcion pills, showing up incapacitated for the proper performance of his duties as a result of
previous wrongful overindulgence in drugs, and soliciting the urinalysis monitor to commit the offenses of
dcrcliction of duty and false official statenlent by requesting that hc urinate into the applicant's specimen
cup. The Board discussed the Air Force policy on drug abuse. 'The Board concluded the willful misconduct
was a significant departure from conduct expected of all military members. The characterization of the
discharge received by the applicant was found lo be appropriate.
Issue 2. 'I'he DRB was pleased to see that the applicant has established a good moral character, became a
citizen of the United States, raiscd a family and is a good citizen. However, no inequity or impropriety in his
discharge was suggested or found in the course of the hearing. The Board concluded the misconduct of the
applicant appropriately characterized his term of service.
CONCLUSIONS: The Discharge Review Board concludes that the discharge was consistent with the
procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation and was within the discretion of the
discharge authority and that the applicant was provided full administrative due process.
In view of the foregoing findings the Board further concludes that there exists no legal or equitable basis for
upgrade of discharge, thus the applicant's discharge should not be changed.
Attachment:
Examiner's Brief
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD
ANDREtJS AFB, M D
(Former AlC) (HGH AlC)
1, MATTER UNDER REVIEW: Appl. rec'd a UOTH Disch fr Mather AFB, CA on 30 Sep 91
UP AFR 39-10, para 5-49d and 5-50.1 (Misconduct - Drug Abuse). Appeals for
Honorable, and to Change the RE Code, Reason and Authority for Discharge.
2 . BACKGROUND:
a. DOB: 9 Oct 70. Enlmt Age: 18 10/12. Bisch Age: 20 11/12. Educ: HS DIPL.
AFQT: N / A . A-67, E-74, G-52, M-83. PAFSC: 90530 - Pharmacy Specialist.
DAS: 2 Mar 90.
b. Prior Sv: None.
3 . SERVICE UNDER REVIEW:
a. Enlisted as A1C 23 Aug 89 for 4 yrs. Svd: 02 Yrs 01 Mo 08 Das, all A M S .
b. Grade Status: None.
c. Time Lost: None.
d. Art 15's: (1) 5 Nov 90, ath her AFB, CA - Article 121. You did, on or
about 23 Jul 90, steal a bottle of halcion pills, the
property of the United States Air Force. Article 112a.
You did, on or about 24 Jul 90, wrongfully use Halcion,
a schedule IV controlled substance. Article 134. You
did, on or about 25 Jul 90, wrongfully communicate
certain language, to wit: "would you pee in the cup
about halfway and mix it", or words to that , _ _ effect,
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
which language requested the said Sergeant ; - - - - - - - - - - - - j
- - - - - - - - - - -
L - - - - - - - - - - 0'
and false official statement, offenses under the code.
Article 134. You were, on or about 25 Jul 90, as a
result of previous wrongful overindulgence in drugs,
incapacitated for the proper performance of your duties.
Suspended reduction to AB. Forfeiture of $300.00 pay
per month for 2 months (in excess of $150.00 pay per
month for 2 months suspended). Thirty correctional
c:ustody. (No appeal) (No mitigation)
: to commit the offenses of dereliction of duty
e. Additional: None.
f. CM: None.
g. Record of SV: 23 Aug 89 - 22 Apr 91 Mather AFB 3 (Initial)
h. Awards & Decs: NDSM, AFTR.
i. Stmt of Sv: TMS: ( 0 2 ) Yrs (01) Mos ( 0 8 ) Das
TAMS: (02) Yrs (01) MOS (08) Das
4 . BASIS ADVANCED FOR REVIEW: Appln
(DD Fm 293) dtd 27 Jul 05.
(Change Discharge to Honorable, and Change the RE Code, Reason and Authority
for Discharge)
Issue 1: For Re-enlistment (Employment) purposes. I have suffered the
consequences of my actions which led to my discharge from the Air Force.
Issue 2: After discharge establish (sic) good moral character and became
citizen of the United States of America, raised family and led an exemplary life
with no other infraction that will put my good citizenship in question. I want
to be able to prove to my children and myself after recent changes in living
situations (divorce, unemployment) that I learned my lesson. 14 (sic) yrs of
humility, therefore, I request for the Boards consideration and forgiveness.
The only justifiable way for me to prove my sincerity is to have the chance to
strongly support the country I swear to protect.
ATCH
None
e
DEPARTMENT O W H E AIR FORCE '
HEADQUARTERS 323D FLYING TRAINING WINO (ATC)
MATHER AIR FORCE BASE CA 056B5-MMO
@
F ~ w 5 - r n 3 V
REPLY TO
ATTNOF:
CC
SUBJECy; N o t i f i c a t i o n Letter--Board Hearing
2 4 MAY 199)
1. I am recommending your discharge f r o m t h e United S t a t e s Air Force f o r drug
abuse according t o AFR 39-10, under t h e p r o v i s i o n s o f paragraphs 5-49d and 5-
50.1.
Copies o f t h e documents t o be forwarded t o t h e separation a u t h o r i t y t o
support t h i s recommendation are attached;
2. My reasons f o r t h i s a c t i o n a r e :
a. On o r about 23 J u l y 1990, a t o r near Mather A i r Force Base, you d i d
wrongfully s t e a l a b o t t l e o f Halcion p i l l s , t h e property o f t h e United S t a t e s
i n v i o l a t i o n o f A r t i c l e 121, UCMJ as evidenced by A r t i c l e 15.
A i r Force,
5 November 1990.
b, On o r about 24 J u l y 1990, a t or near Mather A i r Force Base, you d i d
i n v i o l a t i o n o f
wrongfully use Halcion, a schedule
A r t i c l e 112a, UCMJ, as evidenced by A r t i c l e 15, 5 November 1990.
I V c o n t r o l l e d substance,
c. On o r about 25 J u l y 1990, a t o r near Mather A i r Force Base, you d i d
i n t h e cup
wrongfully communicate c e r t a i n language, t o w i t :
requested
about halfway and p i x i t - ' ' n r w n r t - t ~ t o t h a t e f f e c t , which
t h e said Sergeant'
t o commit the offenses o f d e r e l i c t i o n o f
duty and f a l s e o f f ~ c i a l sr.ar;ernenr;;- offenses i n v i o l a t i o n o f A r t i c l e 134, UCMJ,
a s evidenced by A r t i c l e 15,
J u l y
r e s u l t o f previous wrongful
1990,
f n drugs, you were incapacitated f o r t h e proper performance o f
overindulgence
your duties,
i n v i o l a t i o n o f A r t i c l e 134, UCMJ, as evidenced by A r t i c l e 15,
5 November 1990,
a t o r near Mather A i r Force Base, as a
5 November 1990; Further, an o r about 25
"would you pee
language
This a c t i o n c o u l d
than
3.
honorable conditions; I am recommending t h a t you r e c e i v e an under other than
honorable c o n d i t i o n s d i scharge. The commander e x e r c i s i n g SPCM j u r i s d i c t i o n o r
I f you are
a higher a u t h o r i t y w i
discharged, you w i
l be i n e l f g f b l e f o r reenlistment i n t h e A i r Force.
r e s u l t i n your separation w i t h an under o t h e r
l make t h e f i n a l decision i n t h i s matter.
l
l
4. You have t h e r i g h t t o :
a. Consult l e g a l counsel;
b . Present your case t o an a d m i n i s t r a t i v e discharge board;
c ; Be represented by l e g a l counsel a t a board hearing;
d, Submit statements
the board hearing;
i n your own behalf i n a d d i t i o n t o , o r i n l f e u o f ,
e . Waive
t h e above r i g h t s . You must consult l e g a l counsel before making
a decision t o waive any o f your r j g h t s .
l e g a l counsel Capf
t o c o n s u l t her on 28 May 1991 a t 0930.
6. M i l i t a r y
extension
42260, has been obtained t o a s s i s t you. An appurnrment has been scheduled for
Instead o f t h e appointed counsel,
you
you may have another,
i f t h e lawyer you request i s i n the a c t i v e m i l i t a r y
service and i s reasonsably a v a i l a b l e as determined according t o AFR 111-1.
I n
a d d i t i o n t o m i l i t a r y counsel, you have t h e r i g h t t o employ c f v i l i a n counsel.
The A i r Force does n o t pay expenses i n c i d e n t t o
the employment o f c i v i l i a n
counsel. C i v i l i a n counsel, i f employed, must be r e a d i l y a v a i l a b l e .
B u i l d i n g 2844,
7. Confer w i t h y o u r counsel and
specify1 ng t h e r i g h t s you choose t o exercise. The statement must be signed i n
the presence o f your counsel who a l s o w i
r i g h t
t o a hearing before an a d m i n i s t r a t i v e discharge board, you may submit w r i t t e n
i n your own behalf. I w i l l send t h e statements t o the discharge
statements
I f
a u t h o r i t y w i t h t h e case f i l e t o be considered w i t h t h i s
l c o n s t i t u t e a waiver o f t h e r i g h t t o t h e
you f a i l t o respond, your f a i l u r e w i
board hearing.
i n w r l t f n g , w i t h i n 7 workdays,
l sign it. I f you waive your
recommendations.
l
r e p l y ,
l
8. Any personal i n f o r m a t i o n you f u r n i s h i n r e b u t t a l i s covered by t h e Privacy
Act Statement as explained i n AFR 39-10, attachment 6.
i s
a v a i l a b l e
f o r your use i n B u i l d i n g 650, 323d F l y i n g T r a i n i n g Wing Hospjtal,
Room 1-14-24.
A copy o f AFR 39-10
9. Execute t h e attached acknowledgment and r e t u r n i t t o me immediately.
I Squadron Section
Capt, USAF, MSC
2 Atch
1. AF Fm 3070, Record o f Non-
j u d i c i a l Punishment Proceedings,
5 Nov 90
2. Airman's Acknowledgment
AF | DRB | CY2005 | FD2005-00102
-- I AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST. He contends that his commander at the time of discharge stated he believed applicant was deserving of an Honorable Discharge but was directed to offer him a General Discharge, that at the Administrative Discharge Board, his commander testified that he should have an Honorable Discharge (applicant later changed his issue to state that his commander's testimony was that he should receive a General Discharge),...
AF | DRB | CY2004 | FD2003-00527
Not k~mwing this discharge ~. (Atch 6 ) g. On 12 J u l y 1989, you went from your appointed p l a c e of duty without a u t h o r i t y , a s evidenced by a Record o f I n d i v i d u a l Counseling, dated 12 J u l y 1989. If you a r e discharged, you w i l l be i n e l i g i b l e f o r 3.
AF | DRB | CY2002 | FD2002-0021
c CONCLUSIONS: %- Discharge Review Board concludes that the discharge was con2istent with the procedural and subsmive requirements of the discharge regulation and was within theacretion of the discharge authority and that the applicant was provided full administrative due process. ated t h i s discharge action a general discharge without consulted w i t h counsel and waived __ - - 3. Execute-the attached acknowledgement and r e t u r n it t o me -,- - --_ -_ - - Suspended A r t...
AF | DRB | CY2004 | FD2004-00137
MD 20762-7002 AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00 (EF-V2) Previous edition will be used I I AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE CASE NUMBER FD-2004-00137 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable. LOC , LOC , LOC , LOR, 25 MAY 90 19 MAY 89 20 APR 89 01 MAR 89 - Late for duty. S u p p o r t i n g Documents a AF Form 3070, s e r v e d 6 Nov 9 0 , w / a t c h b LOR, d a t e d 1 3 J u l 90 w / a t c h c LOC, d a t e d 25 May 90 d LOC, d a t e d 19 May 89 e...
AF | DRB | CY2006 | FD2006-00009
, - - - - - - - - - - - ISSUES A92.21 A92.19 A02.19 A02.25 A93.21 I 11 Mav 2006 I I INDEXNUMBER A60.00 1 I ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD 2 ( APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE 3 1 LETTER OF NOTIFICATION 4 BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE COUNSEL'S RELEASE TO THE BOARD ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIME OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE I TAPE RECORDING OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE 5 CASE NUMBER FD-2006-00009 I I APPLICANT'S ISSUE AND T m BOARD'S DECISIONAL RATIONAL ARE DISCUSSED ON THE ATTACHED AIR FORCE DISCHARGE...
AF | DRB | CY2007 | FD2006-00385
He was administratively disciplined for failing dorm room inspections, failing to maintain proper standards of personal hygiene and cleanliness, failure to go, and operating a vehicle without insurance or current registration. DD Form 214 APPLICATION FOR THE REVIEW OF DISCHARGE FROM THE ARMED FORCES OF THE UNITED STATES (Piease read Instnrcrions on Pages 3 and 4 BEFORE completing this application.) As a r e s u l t , your v e h i c l e was impounded and you r e c e i v e d a L e t t e r o...
AF | DRB | CY2006 | FD2005-00457
AIR FORCE DISCIIARC.E REVIEH BOARD lS3SCOMM.AKD DR. EE HIKG.3RD FI.OOR ANDREWS AFB, MD 20762-7002 AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00 (EF-V2) Previous edition will be used AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE CASE NUMBER FD-2005-00457 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable. Attachment: Examiner's Brief .--------------------------------- DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD ANDREWS AFB, MD (Former AMN) (HGH A1C) 1. On 18 October...
AF | DRB | CY2004 | FD2004-00141
ISSUES: Applicant was recommended for discharge based on both drug abuse and misconduct; the records indicated the applicant received five Letters of Counseling (LOCs) for being late to work, and a commander- directed urinalysis was returned positive for the presence of cocaine. Member exercised his right to an administrative discharge board and the board found that member was late to work five times and did wrongfully use cocaine. SrA-(APR Indicates): 14 Jun 85-21 Dec 85.
AF | DRB | CY2004 | FD2004-00170
.. SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE PERSONNEL COUNCIL AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD 1535 COMMAND DR, EE WING, 3RD FLOOR ANDREWS AFB, MD 20762-7002 AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00 (EF-V2) Previous edition will be used AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE CASE NUMBER FD-2004-00170 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable and to change the reason and authority for the discharge. Svd: 1 Yrs 6 Mo 22 Das, all AMS b. Grade Status: AB - 19 Sep 90 (Vacation of...
AF | DRB | CY2005 | FD2005-00037
550 C STREET WEST, SUITE 40 RANDOLPH AFB, TX 78150-4742 SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE PERSONNEL COUNCIL AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD 1535 COMMAND DR, EE WING, 3RD FLOOR ANDREWS AFB, MD 20762-7002 - AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD 1)ECISIONAL RATIONALE I GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of bischarge to honorable. However, based upon the record and evidence provided by applicant, the Board finds the applicant s reason and authority for discharge inequitable. Svd: 3 yrs 2 months 4...