DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD
S
2 NAVY ANNE
X
WASHINGTON DC 20370.510
0
MEH:ddj
Docket No:
14 h/lay 2002
53
I-02
This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section
1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
session, considered your application on 14 May 2002. Your allegations of error and
were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the
proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your
application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
iii_justice
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. Members who can complete training requirements prior to EAOS are not
“obliserve to train and reenlist ” option. You completed your training February 2002 and
the
your EAOS was 19 May 2002. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and
votes of the members of the panel will be
i~poii request.
furnished
eligible for
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are
such that favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
In this regard, it is important
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently,
when applying for a correction of an
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
ofticial naval record, the burden is on the applicant to
Sincerely?
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 00495-02
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by attached. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use by the Enclosure (1) Board for Correction of Naval is returned.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 10360-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 April 2003. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use by the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08590-02
when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. (c), sailor may reenlist anytime within the same fiscal year The petitioner's EAOS is 17 May 2003, which is in the Per In view of the above, recommend the petitioner record remain as 2. is. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) by the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) Enclosure (1) is returned.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06314-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 January 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. recommend the petitioner's record This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use 3. by the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06118-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 September 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and In addition, the Board considered the advisory applicable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02613-02
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 III II : M EH Docket No: 2613-02 9 July 2002 This is in reference to your application provisions of title IO of the Ilnitrtl States (:otle, section 1553. for correction 01‘ your naval record pursuant to the o!l 9 three-menlber panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive A session, considered your application were reviewed in accordance proceedings of this Board. ...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03731-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 August 2002. were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. January 1978. member's ADSD, or January 2004 for EAOS is now 13 months past his HYT date. -Ten of the fourteen ast his PRD are months additional obligated service beyond his HYT date.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 05561-07
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC Memo 1160 Ser 811/395 dtd 21 Aug 07, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 00858-06
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 2 May 2006. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. San Diego, CA for shore duty with a Projected Rotation Date (PRD) of December 2005. lAW Ref(a) to maintain his CONSUBPAY eligibility, he needed to extend/reenlist through February...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 00177-03
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 April 2003. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use by the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.