D E P A R T M E N T O F THE N A V Y
B O A R D F O R C O R R E C T I O N O F N A V A L R E C O R D S
2 N A V Y A N N E X
W A S H I N G T O N D C 2 0 3 7 0 - 5 1 0 0
CRS
Docket No: 8735-01
10 April 2002
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10, United
States Code, Section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 10 April 2002. Your allegations of error and
injustice were revidwed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
your application, together with all material submitted in support
thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations
and policies.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice.
The Board found that you enlisted in the Navy on 21 January 1997.
Although your record does not contain the separation processing
documents, it appears that in early 1998, the commanding officer
recommended that you be separated with an other than honorable
discharge by reason of misconduct and, after review by the
discharge authority, the recommendation for separation was
approved. The record clearly shows that on 24 April 1998 you
were discharged with an other than honorable discharge by reason
of misconduct. At that time, you were assigned a reenlistment
code of RE-4.
Applicable regulations require the assignment of an RE-4
reenlistment code when an individual is discharged by reason of
misconduct. Since you have been treated no differently than
others in your situation, the Board could not find an error or
injustice in the assignment of your reenlistment code.
Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and
votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.
id not c o n s d B e b R 1 N C W ~ ~ t l f f i ~ M r a c t e r i z a t i o n of
reason E m ~ s ~ a t a ~ n o s k o u d d ~ ~ c ~ n g e d ,
such consideratio~Ahm&~&u have not exhausted your
ard d
e or
k for
ive remedy b y w ~ 4 M J c W W W W a v a l Discharge Review
strat
(NDRB
You may apply to NDRB by submitting the attached
)
DD Form 293.
since you did
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
Enclosure
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04637-01
In the absence of evidence which demonstrates that you were unfit for duty at the time of your discharge, the Board was unable to recommend any corrective action in your case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. 0 2 M A Y 1 9 9 6 DATE MEMBER'S STATEMENT OF UNDERSTANDING: I UNDERSTAND THAT THE RECOMMENDED F I N D I N G OF F I T FOR DUTY I S S U B J E C T...
AF | DRB | CY2007 | FD2006-00347
NAME O F SERVICE MEMBER (I.ASr, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) ......................... '..-..-..-..-..-..-------I TYPE GEN PERSONAL APPEARANCE SSGT I X RECORD REVIEW AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD 1 AFSNISSAN , - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - a NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORCAN17ATION ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION O F COUNSEL I I MEMBER SITTING ,." (Change Discharge to Honorable, and Change the RE Code, Reason for Discharge) ISSUES ATTACHED TO BRIEF. I f t h e r...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07315-01
Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Regulations authorize the assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code to individuals separated by reason of a diagnosed personality disorder. Absent such evidence, the Board concluded that the reason for discharge and separation code were appropriate.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04628-02
advise-hat the report had been " . ~ a r i n e Reported On: a. L u t Name b. In marking the comparison, consider all Marines of this grade whose professional abilities are known to you personally.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02907-02
Pursuant to the provisi filed enclosure (1) with thi corrected to show he was 4 commissioned as a lieutena d&e of rank is 2 lieutenant ns of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be anted two additional years of entry grade credit when he was t in the Medical Corps, U. S. Naval Reserve. Surgery, office with as enclosure (2), the Chief, Bureau of Medicine and ce over the subject matter of this case has...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02602-02
2602-02 15 April 2002 This is in response to your Application for Correction of Military Records requesting that the a nonjudicial punishment be removed from your Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) record. The Board has no authority to correct FBI records. In your case, the Naval Criminal Investigative Service apparently fingerprinted you on about 2 February 1999 as a result of charges filed against you for an orders violation, making false official statement, and larceny of $9,800.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2000 | 07985-00
I~o~veves, cvcnt that the Secretnry considers a product to represent the most appr-opriate countermeasure for diseases endemic to the area of operations or to protect against possible chemical, biological, or- radiological weapons, but the product has not yet been approved by the FDA for its intended use, the product may, under certain circumstances and strict controls, be administered to provide potential protection for the health and well-being of deployed military personnel in order to...
AF | DRB | CY2006 | FD2005-00307
- - - I- / Y ~ ~ M E OF SERVICE MF:RIHYH -- AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD .- - -. 3RD FLOOR ANDREWS AFB, M D 20762-70U2 1 -.A AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00 (EF-V2) Previous edition will be used 1 I I AIR FORCE DISCHARGE HEVlEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATlONALE I FD-2005-00307 I GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorablc, to change thc reason and authority for the discharge, and to changc the reenlist~nent code. Attachment: Examiner's Brief DEPARTMENT OF THE...
AF | DRB | CY2006 | FD2005-00153
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD ANDREWS AFB, MD r c 1 ) (HGH SRA) .i 1. SERVICE UNDER REVIEW: ;>. DC 20693 DD FORM 293.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08338-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Navy Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 April 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. A recruit performance record entry reflects that on 13 March 1998, you failed battle stations for the third time.