DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD
S
2 NAVY ANNE
X
WASHINGTON DC 20370.510
0
TRG
Docket No: 3279-01
23 October 2001
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10 of the United
States Code section 1552.
16 October 2001.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board.
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
your application, together with all material submitted in support
thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations
and policies.
Your allegations of error and
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice.
Concerning your abuse of alcohol you stated that
It was also noted that you had previously been diagnosed
The Board found that you enlisted in the Navy on 15 May 2000 at
age 22.
On 14 August 2000 you presented yourself to the mental
health clinic complaining of suicidal ideation and were
subsequently referred for a psychiatric evaluation.
evaluation report noted that you hated the Navy and wanted to get
out.
with an adjustment disorder with depressed mood and alcohol
dependence.
while in college you were drinking about 12 beers a night, with
more on weekends, and you became violent while drinking.
When
alcohol was unavailable, you smoked heroin so you could sleep.
You were diagnosed with an adjustment disorder with depressed
mood and alcohol dependence.
separation because of your poor coping skills, shallow
motivation, tendency to decompensate,
abuse, and history of suicidal ideation.
allowed to remain in the military you would pose a great risk to
harm yourself or others.
The psychiatrist recommended your
The
extensive alcohol and drug
He believed that if
On 18 August 2000 you received nonjudicial punishment for an
unauthorized absence of about two days in July 2000.
Subsequently, you declined treatment for your alcohol dependence.
Based on the foregoing record,
administrative separation by reason of fraudulent enlistment, a
and alcohol abuse rehabilitation
designated mental condition,
Subsequently, the separation authority directed an
failure.
entry level separation by reason of fraudulent enlistment and you
were so separated on 28 September 2000.
not recommended for reenlistment and were assigned an RE-4
reenlistment code.
you were processed for an
At that time you were
You state in your application that you became depressed after you
discovered that you would have to deploy for long periods.
In
order to gain separation from the Navy, you claimed to be
suicidal.
The Board noted that you fraudulently enlisted because you did
not mention your preservice drug abuse on your preenlistment
documents.
Accordingly, the Board concluded that you were
properly separated by reason of fraudulent enlistment.
Regulations require the assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code
when an individual is separated because of a fraudulent
enlistment.
Since you have been treated no differently then
others separated for that reason, the Board could not find an
error or injustice in the assignment of the RE-4 reenlistment
code.
Accordingly, your application has been denied.
votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.
The names and
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
2
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04334-01
Documentary material considered by the Board your After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) made preliminary findings that you were unfit for duty because of post traumatic stress disorder and major depression, which existed prior to your enlistment, and were not aggravated by your service. ...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07992-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 April 2003. As a result of this hospitalization, a psychological evaluation diagnosed you as having a borderline personality disorder with narcissistic features and alcohol dependence. It was recommended that you receive alcohol rehabilitation treatment and that you be administratively separated due to your diagnosed personality disorder.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05703-00
e. SF 600, Chronological Record of Medical Care, dated 30 July 97, Mental Health Department, Naval Hospital Oak Harbor, documenting on Axis I: Adjustment Disorder with Depressed Mood, Dysthymia, and on Axis II: Dependent and Avoidant Traits 3. Review of the service record revealed: entered the service on 18 August 94 in Portland, Oregon. There is no evidence of a mental illness present at the time of separation that rendered the service member disabled or unlit for increased risk of suicide...
NAVY | DRB | 1999_Navy | ND99-01159
PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW Discussion The applicant was discharged on 970729 with a General (under Honorable conditions) due to alcohol rehabilitation failure (A). After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (C and D).In the applicant’s issue 1, the Board determined this issue is without merit. The applicant’s medical record...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06039-00
6039-00 9 February 2001 -_ Dear- This is in reference to your naval record pursuant to the States Code, Section 1552. application for correction of your provisions of Title 10, United Board for Correction of Navy A three-member panel for the Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 February 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. that the Navy's diagnosis of a...
AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01950
The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. He indicated he had been hospitalized for suicidal ideations and gestures to include a deliberate overdose. The plan was for the CI to follow his self-care plan, be released to his First Sergeant, be separated that...
USMC | DRB | 2005_Marine | MD0500482
[Lack of judgment absenting yourself from your appointed place of duty, lack of discipline in failing to obey company and battalion orders regarding guest in the barracks and battalion restrictions, and lack of judgment in intentionally inflicting harm upon yourself.] 040330: Commanding Officer recommended discharge under honorable conditions (general) for the convenience of the government due to a personality disorder, based upon a diagnosed personality disorder as evidenced by psychiatric...
USMC | DRB | 2002_Marine | MD02-00923
Pt contracted for safety and denied active suicidal/homicidal ideations. The Board found no documentation to support the Applicant’s allegations that he was hazed, harassed or that his chain of command violated his rights to privacy. The Applicant’s conduct evaluation average and summary court-martial record warranted a characterization of service of under honorable conditions (general).
NAVY | DRB | 2005_Navy | ND0501161
ND05-01161 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review was received on 20050708. I have let myself and the Navy down. The separation code “JDT”, fraudulent entry into military service, drug abuse, was substantiated by the Applicant’s statement to medical officers that he had used drugs prior to entry to active duty after having denied any pre-service drug use during the enlistment and induction process.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05132-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 November 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. On 22 May 1992 the discharge authority approved an Your were so discharged on 28 May 1992 and Regulations authorize the assignment of an RE-4 or RE-3G reenlistment code to an individual separated by reason...