DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 LCC:ddj
Docket No: 92-01
12 June 2001
This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
session, considered your application on 12 June 2001. Your allegations of error and injustice
were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the
proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your
application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory
opinion furnished by BUPERS memorandum 5420 PERS 862 of 7 March 2001, a copy of which
is attached.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in
the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and votes of
the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this regard, it is important
to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records. Consequently,
when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
Enclosure
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVY PERSONNEL COMMAND
5720 INTEGRITY DRIVE
MILLINGTON TH 38055-0000
5420
PERS-862
7 Mar OL
MEMORNADUM FOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF
NAVAL RECORDS
Via: Assistant for BCNR Matters, PERS-00ZCB
Subj: COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATION:
Ref: (a) Your memo 5420 Pers-00ZCB of 9 Feb O01
Encl: (1) BCNR File 00092-01 w/Service Record
‘li Per reference (a) we have reviewed enclosure (1) and the following
comments and recommendations are provided:
a. Petty Officer giggqggimmdipiliame: cequest for advancement subsequent
to his recall to active duty in the Enlisted TAR Program was reviewed
and disapproved due to manning in the TAR Aircrew Survival
Equipmentman (PR) rating. It should be noted that only one quota was
authorized for advancement to PR1 for the September 1999 advancement
cycle. Approval in this case would have been unfair to those who took
the exam but were not advanced due to quota limitations.
b. Petty Officer Sap@mMMBMMM® statements concerning the events
leading up to this disapproval are without substantiation. However,
conceding his statements might in the future be verified, and an
injustice proven, we have recomputed the final multiple from the
examination he completed as if he were competing for TAR advancement
to PR1. His recomputed final multiple as a TAR is 198.50. The final
multiple required for TAR advancement to PR1 is 208.58. The primary
reason his final multiple under active duty computation is lower is
because he has less creditable active duty length of service and
service in paygrade. Reserve service is not creditable in the active
duty final multiple computation.
2. In view of the above, this office cannot support Petty Officer
ee advancement to PR1 under any circumstances. Accordingly,
we recommend his petition be denied. cee Bh a
‘direction
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03362-01
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by BUPERS memorandum 5420 PERS 862 of 16 August 2001, a copy of which is attached. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03211-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 July 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by BUPERS memorandum 5420 PERS 862 of 11 June 2001, is attached your naval record and In addition, the Board considered the advisory your a copy of which After...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02307-01
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by BUPERS memorandum 5420 PERS 862 of 11 June 2001, a copy of which is attached. She was recalled to active duty for two The effective date of advancement to CTAl selected for advancement to February 1997 (Cycle 060) CTAl Navywide She was properly denied advancement to CTAl...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08045-00
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 March 2001. opinion furnished by BUPERS memorandum 5420 PERS 862 undated, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05495-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 2 October 2001. were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by BUPERS...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07022-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 22 Janaury 2003. were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. Per reference (a), the following recommendation and comments are...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01705-01
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and In addition, the Board considered the advisory applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Delayed'Entry Program (DEP) on 21 August 1998 under a Navy Veteran (NAVET), enlisted in the ""states that he has an EB entry in his DD Form 1966 and requests favorable action that would allow payment of an EB. Petty Officer paygrade E-3 or below...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2004 | 01590-04
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 May 2004. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01591-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 27 June 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. On 6 May 1998 Naval Reserve Center, Cape Girardeau requested a review of his status by the President, Physical Evaluation Board.
NAVY | BCNR | CY1998 | NC9806586
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 22 June 1999. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. Subject member petitioned the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) in accordance with reference (a), to correct errors and or remove injustices in the service record.