DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF
NA’IAL RECORD
S
2 NAVY ANNE
X
WASHINGTON DC 20370.510
0
SMC
Docket No: 06066-00
14 June 2001
This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
session, considered your application on 14 June 2001. Your allegations of error and injustice
were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the
proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your
application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
opinion furnished by the Navy Personnel Command
is attached.
In addition, the Board considered the advisory
daed 30 October 2000, a copy of which
(FY) 99
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. The Board was unable to find your consideration by the Fiscal Year
Limited Duty Officer Selection Board for intelligence was unfair. In this regard, they noted
your record reflected enough service to make you eligible for consideration. Further, you
state that at least two of the candidates selected by the FY
have any extended active duty service other than annual training.
communicate to the board any information you considered important; you state it was not
until after your selection by the FY 00 board that you were erroneously advised you were
ineligible to be considered by the FY 99 board.
been denied. The names and votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon
request.
99 board for intelligence “did not
” Finally, you were free to
In view of the above, your application has
,
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be
taken. You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new
and material evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this
regard, it is important to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official
records. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the
burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or
injustice.
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
Enclosure
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
COIklMAND
DFllVE
5720 INTEGRITY
NAVY PERSONNEL
MILLINGTON TN 3805 5-0000
MEMORANDUM FOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION
OF NAVAL RECORDS
573 0
PERS 91
30
Ott 00
Via:
Subj:
Ref:
Assistant for BCNR Matters
(PERS-OOZCB)
RE
IS
OPIN
USNR
SE OF
(a) Your memo 5420 PERS-OOZCB of 17
(b) Report of a Selection Board convened at the
Ott 00
Bureau of Naval Personnel, Washington, DC
23 February 1998
Encl:
(1) BCNR File 06066-00
requested in reference (a) enclosure (1) is returned with
Offic
Petty
requesting that
ause he was unjustly denied opportunity to
petition be denied.
his FY-00 commissioning be
1. As
recommen
the
Petty Office
back dated t
compet
Office
Officer Selection Board for Intelligence
selected.
mmission in FY-99.
record was placed
Per reference (b) Petty
befcre the FY-99 Limited Duty
(6455), but he was not
He was selected for Intelligence (6455) in FY-00.
uestions may be directed to
t DSN 882-4515 or
Director,
Administration Division
Naval Reserve Personnel
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 00511-01
considered the advisory opinions furnished by the Navy Personnel Command dated 5 April, 23 July and 16 August 2001, copies of which are attached. The member requests the removal of the following fitness reports. performance and making recommendations concerning promotion and assignment are the responsibilities of the reporting senior.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05662-00
The Board found that even if you had been considered by the Mobilization Disposition Board, and you had been - Inactive status as a result of approval of a board occurred until after the Fiscal Year (FY) 00 Naval Reserve Line Lieutenant Commander Selection Board had adjourned. recommendation again th is requesting removal 0 promotion to lieutenant original opinion stating that he transferred to Standby 19 May 1999 Naval Reserve Officer Mobilization Disposition Board. tha would have been a...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07125-00
The member alleges an administrative error was made on his fitness report in question concerning his promotion recommendation. c. The member and the reporting senior refer to changes to the fitness report in question as administrative changes. is returned concurr 5420 Pers 85 27 Mar 01 ings of NR The fitness report dated 14 Jul 98 2. have affected the FY-00 Active Duty Captain Line Promotion Selection Board, as it The FY-01 board would have been the first convened 14 Jan 99. to review the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04456-00
(MSC) Captain Selection Boards; special selection board Naval Reserve MSC Captain Selection Board, by which you You requested, in effect, removal of your failures of selection by the Fiscal Year (FY) 2001 through 2003 Medical Service consideration for the FY 2000 were not considered; and amendment of the remedial memorandum now in your naval record, stating you have served on active duty continuously since your discharge from the Regular Navy on 31 January 1990, to show you are “USN” (United...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08579-00
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 July 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by the Navy Personnel Command dated 16 February 2001, a copy of which is attached.
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 00359-99
In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by the Navy Personnel Command dated 4 May 1999 with enclosure, a copy of which is attached. requested continuation in an active status in 2. captai- order to be considered by the FY-00 Naval Reserve 0-7 Line Promotion Board which convened on 8 February 1999. NPC-911 is responsible for Naval Reserve Continuation Boards.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07093-00
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Ott 1 to 98 that his fitness report for the period of Ott 31 is in error because his mid-term board on the grounds 97 counselina was not term counsel disadvantage. The member requests correction to his fitness report for the period 1 October 1997 to 3 1 October 1998.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02507-01
You requested, in effect, removal of your failures of selection by the Fiscal Year (FY) 99 and 00 Naval Reserve Line Lieutenant Commander Selection Boards; that you be granted a special selection board for FY 99; that your discharge of 31 March 2000 from the Naval Reserve be set aside; that you be reinstated to the Inactive Status List lieutenant, with a date of rank adjustment to reflect seniority as if you had been placed on the ISL on 1 June 1998; and that your 16 June 1995 completion of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02196-00
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 February 2001. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by the Navy Personnel Command dated 23 May 2000, and the memorandum for the record dated 14 February 2001, copies of which are attached. Former Reference (b) requires that promotion selection essage, as was promotion boards and The Per reference (c), a lieutenant who has at least...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05958-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 October 2002. reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by NPC...