Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03316-01
Original file (03316-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE  N A V Y  

B O A R D   F O R   C O R R E C T I O N  O F   N A V A L   R E C O R D S  

2   N A V Y   A N N E X  

W A S H I N G T O N   D C   2 0 3 7 0 - 5 1 0 0  

J LP:yl-i 
~ o c k e t  No:  3316-01 
18 June  2002 

Dear 

'This  is  in  reference  to  your application  for correction  01'  your  naval  record  p~~rsuant to  the 
provisions  of  title  10 of  the  I.Jnited  States  Code,  section  1552. 

A three-member  panel  of  the  Boartl  for  Correction  of  Niival  Iiccorcls,  sitting  in  executive 
session,  considered  your  application  on  18 June 2002.  Yoi~r allegations  of  error  and  in.justice 
were  reviewed  i n  accorda~~ce with  administ rat ive  regulations  and  procedures  applicable to  tlie 
proceedings  of  this  Board.  Docirlnentary  ~iiaterial considered  by  the  Boartl  consisted  of  your 
application, together  with  all  tilaterial  submitted  in  support  thereof,  your  naval  record  and 
applicable  statutes,  regulations  and  policies. 
opinion  filrnishetl by  NPC  me~iiorandu~ii 1780 PEIZS-604 of  26 Sune 2001, a  copy  of  which  is 
attached. 

In  addition, the  Roartl  considered  the  advisory 

After  careful  and  conscientious consideration  of  the  entire  record,  the  Board  found  that  the 
evidence  sublnitted  was  insufficient  to establish  tlie existence of   robab able  tilaterial  error or 
injustice.  In  this connection,  tlie  Board  substantially  concurred  with  tlie co~n~iients contained  in 
the advisory  opinion.  Accordingly,  your  application  tias  been  denied.  The riallies and  votes  of 
the  members  of  the panel  will  be  furnished  upon  request. 

It  is  regretted  that  the circu~nstances of  your  case  are  s ~ h  
that  fiivorahle action  cannot  be  taken. 
You  are entitled  to  have  tlie  Board  reconsider  its decision  upon  sl~l)mission of  new  and  material 
In  this  regard,  it  is  itnportant 
evidence or other  ~iiatter not  previously  considered  by  the  Board. 
to  keep  in  mind  that  a  presumption  of  regularity  attaches  to all  official  records.  Consequently, 
wlieri  applying  for a correction  of  an  ofticial  naval  record,  the  burden  is on  the  applicant  to 
demonstrate the existence of  probable  material  error  or  i~!justice. 

Sincerely, 

W.  DEAN  PFEIFFER 
Executive  Director 

Enclosure 

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY 

NAVY PERSONNEL COMMAND 

5720 INTEGRITY DRIVE 

MILLINGTON TN 38055-0000 

17 8 0 
PERS-604 
26 Jun 01 

MEMORANDUM FOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF 

NAVAL RECORDS 

Via:  Assistant for BCNR Matters  (PERS-OOZCB) 

Ref: 

(a) CNPC memo- 5420 PERS-OOZCB of 7 Jun 01 
(b) Title 38, United States Code, Chapter 32 
(c) Veterans Benefits and Health Care Improvement Act  of 

2000  (PL 106-419) 

1.  The following is provided in response to reference  (a): 

a.  Recommend the Board deny -s 

request to enroll In 

the Veterans Educational Assistance Program  (VEAP).  Per reference 
(b), VEAP was closed to new enrollments on 30 June 1985, but reopened 
for five months from 28 October 1986 to 31 March 1987.  Members who 
did not enroll before these deadlines lost their eligibility.  It was 

ossible to open a VEAP account with a zero balance as- 

stated.  The minimum amount for an allotment was $25.00. 

s&@ 

Navy has no record of a VEAP account for YNC-. 

b.  DD Form 2057 was used to document member's election to enroll 

or decline enrollment in VEAP.  There was no requirement for 
individual counseling or to retain documentation of a member's 
election.  Notification of the open period and final closure of VEAP 
was given the widest dissemination via NAVOP messages, Navy Times 
articles, and by placing a statement on the Leave and Earnings 
Statements of - all active duty members for several months. 

c.  Since this program closed over 14 years ago, it is not 

expected that members would remember the specifics of the program or 
notification of its closure.  Now that reference  : c )   authorizes VEAP 
participants to enroll in the Montgomery GI Bill  (MGIB) Program, 
those who never participated are petitioning the Hoard for waivers to 
the law to establish VEAP accounts.  Over 40,000 Sailors are in this 
category. 

2.  PERS-604's point of contact 
reached at  (DSN) 882-4245 or  ( C )  

who can be 

Director, Navy Drug &  Alcohol, 
Behavioral Health, Federal 
Education, &  Partnerships 
Division  (PERS-60) 



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 06757-01

    Original file (06757-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material consitleretl by the Boartl consisted of your application, together with all ~ilaterial suh~nittctl in support thereat', your niiviil record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Boartl considered the advisory I3 Noveliilw 2001. a copy of After careful and conscientioirs consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probahle material error or In this connection,...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07571-01

    Original file (07571-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 March 2002. b. DD Form 2057 was used to document member's election to enroll or decline enrollment in VEAP. In some cases, members signed their DD Form 2057 indicating they could enroll at any time while on active duty.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07306-01

    Original file (07306-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-niember panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 March 2002. DD Form 2057 was used to document member's election to enroll or decline enrollment in VEAP. Members who initially entered active duty during the VEAP era were not eligible for MGIB Program enrollment.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07937-01

    Original file (07937-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 March 2002. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC memorandu~n 1780 Pers 604 of l l January 2002, a copy of which is attached. c. Reference (c) offered MGIB Program enrollment to active duty members with money in a VEAP account on 9 October 1996 (date of enactment).

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04209-01

    Original file (04209-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 21 August 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. This office has checked with the Department of Veterans aving a VEAP Members who b. DD Form 2057 was used to document member's election to enroll or...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05076-01

    Original file (05076-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The following is provided in response to reference (a): Recommend the Board deny -* s request to enroll t;e Veterans Educational Assistance Program (VEAP). was no requirement for services to retain documentation of a member's election so it is unlikely his record ever contained a DD Form 2057.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 01975-03

    Original file (01975-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Reference (c) offered MGIB Program enrollment to active duty members with money in a VEAP account on 9 October 1996 (date of enactment). As stated above, references (c) and (d) provided opportunities to "VEAP participants" not 'VEAP-era members. could convert VEAP eligibility to states he was never afforded the he learned of a period of time when was not d. Granting the petitioner's request will not guarantee the Department of Veterans Affairs will award VEAP or MGIB Program benefits since...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05458-01

    Original file (05458-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Recommend the Board deny HMCS Suyat's request to enroll Per entered the VEAP was available to members who in the Veterans Educational Assistance Program (VEAP). references (c) and (d) for members like HMCS Suyat who did not participate in VEAP. DD Form 2057 was used to document member's election to In some cases, members The DD Form 2057 submitted by enroll-or decline enrollment in VEAP.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08083-01

    Original file (08083-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD S 2 NAVY ANNE X WASHINGTON DC 20370-510 0 J LP: yrj Docket No: X083-0 9 July 2002 1 panel A three-member session, considered your were reviewed in proceedings of‘ this Board. application, together with all applicable statutes. regulations opinion furnished NI’C attached.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03000-01

    Original file (03000-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by BUPERS memorandum 1780 PERS 604 of 26 June 2001, a copy of which is attached. b. DD Form 2057 was used to document member's election to enroll or decline enrollment in VEAP.