DEPARTMENT OF THE NAV
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
Y
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 203704100
,
MEH:ddj
Docket No: 7312-99
27 June
2ooO
This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
session, considered your application on 27 June 2000.
were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the
proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your
application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
opinion furnished by CMC memorandum
attached.
In addition, the Board considered the advisory
1001/l MMEA-6 of 24 May 2000, a copy of which is
Your allegations of error and injustice
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in
the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and votes of
the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
In this regard, it is important
Consequently,
;
Enclosure
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
c
HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES
DEPARTMENT OF THE
3283 RUSSELL ROA
NAW’
MARIPJE CORPS
D
QUANTICO,
‘IIFWINIA 22134-5103
IN HEPLV REFER To:
1001/l
MMEA- 6
ii 6: ’
I ?
?#%S
MEMORANDUM FOR THE
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF
NAVAL RECORDS
Subj:
BCNR DOCKET
OF STAFF
**1;,
We have reviewed Staff Sergeant
1.
his request for a contract modification and subsequent
entitlement to a Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) be denied.
case and recommend
Staff Sergeant
Bethard executed reenlistment authority on 1
The Marine Corps announced on 25
January 1999, via
024/99, the SRB that Staff
Sergeant
S
2 .
January 1999.
MARADMIN
contending.
3 .
Staff
Sergean
SRB.
executed his reenlistment authority almost three weeks
Although this may be factual, Staff Sergeant
argues he was not informed of the
prior to the publication of the SRB message.
policies governing SRB bonuses,
modified for the sole reason of SRB eligibility.
not eligible for a SRB,
military occupational specialty (PMOS) 4067 when he reenlisted.
reenlistment contracts are not
Thus, he was
Zone B multiple of (3) in primary
In accordance with
4 .
Point of contact is Staff Sergeant
DSN 278-9235.
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 03510-99
In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CMC Memorandum 100111 MMEA-6, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. Unfortunately, Stalff sergean- executed his reenlistment authority on 24 March 1999, as a Sergeant in PMOS 2531.
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | Document scanned on Tue Jan 30 17_54_01 CST 2001
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 September 1999. Therefore, Warrant Officer Colemon did not warrant Marines in receipt of permanent change Staff Sergeant Lamie, the Marine 3. asserts was given preferential treatment, was approved for early reenlistment because he was complying with orders to recruiting duty. reenlistment in 1991. meet the requirements for an early reenlistment and his...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | Document scanned on Tue Jan 30 16_58_29 CST 2001
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 September 1999. Therefore, Warrant Officer Colemon did not warrant Marines in receipt of permanent change Staff Sergeant Lamie, the Marine 3. asserts was given preferential treatment, was approved for early reenlistment because he was complying with orders to recruiting duty. reenlistment in 1991. meet the requirements for an early reenlistment and his...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 01964-00
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and In addition, the Board considered the advisory applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Control (ECFC) policy, According to the Enlisted Career Force sergeants who have twice failed selection to the next higher grade must leave active duty at he end of active service sergeant twice and was therefore denied further service. in order...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08003-00
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 August 2001. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. P1900.16E, Marine Corps Separations MC0 if a Marine does not meet all reenlistment we recommend the Board for correction of Naval Records Additionally, unqualified Per 5.
NAVY | BCNR | CY1998 | 05583-98
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 23 March 1999. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CMC memorandum 1001/ 1 MMEA-6 of 17 February 1999, a copy of which is attached. - On 7 April 1997, u r n t e His current reenlistment was r enlistment contract was a probationary reenlistment contract.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00004-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 April 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The actual reenlistment request for 36 months supports these documents as well.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02581-00
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by CMC memorandum attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08183-00
Your request to change your sergeant date of rank to 9 October 1998 was not considered, as the Marine Corps Total Force System already reflects that date. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. However, they sa 9 his date of rank is MCRC; that MCRC set his date of rank as 1 Jan 95; and that unless BCNR rules otherwise, MMPR-2...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 04433-99
It is noted that the Commandant of the Marine Corps (CMC) has removed your adverse fitness report for 17 October to 9 November 1998. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice warranting restoration of your drill instructor military occupational specialty (MOS) or your special duty assignment (SDA) pay. The memorandum will...