DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD
S
2 NAVY ANNE
X
WASHINGTON DC 20370-510
0
LCC: ddj
Docket No:
17 January 2001
196440
This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
session, considered your application on 17 January 2001. Your allegations of error and injustice
were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the
proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your
application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
In addition, the Board considered the advisory
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
opinion furnished by CMC memorandum
attached.
1001/l MMEA-6 of 19 April 2000, a copy of which is
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice.
In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in
the advisory opinion.
Additionally, the Board noted that you met Marine Corps (MC) height and weight standards on
the date you reenlisted on 30 November 1995 and again on the date you were discharged. The
Board also noted that you received nine evaluations during your enlistment and on seven of the
reports you did not meet MC height and weight standards.
Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and votes of the members of the
panel will be furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this regard, it is important
to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records. Consequently,
when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
Enclosure
D. ARTMENT OF THE NAVY
HEADQUARTERS
UNITWTATES MARINE CORPS
3280 RUSSELL ROA
D
QUANTICO, VIRGINIA 22134-5103
IN REPLY REFER To:
1001/l
MMEA-6
RPR
9 3
2co0
MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF
NAVAL RECORDS
We have reviewed
1.
separation pay and recommend
request for additional
it be denied.
2.
On 26 October 1999,
9, we
as not eligi
ted reenlistment.
further service.
ervice due to
service limitations.
" Control
(ECFC) policy,
According to the Enlisted Career Force
sergeants who have twice failed selection
to the next higher grade must leave active duty at he end of
active service
sergeant twice and was therefore denied further service.
Sergean- failed selection to staff
(EAs).
Additionally,
requisites con
Retention Man
3.
pre
and
failed to "have demonstrate the high standar
professional competence,
did not meet reenlistment
40.31H, En
ph 4103.1,
ed Career Planning
and personal behavior required to
stige and quality standards of the Marine Corps."
had
ing to maintain weight standards.
%&%?adverse fitness reports
was within height/weight/bodyfat
reenlistment request, but he had failed repeatedly to uphold these
We authorized Sergeant
standards during his current contract.
standards at the
eligibility
one half separation pay and assigned him a reenlisment
(RE) code of RE-3C (substandard performance).
P1900.16D,
and SECNAVINST
Per Marine Corps Order
4.
Retirement Manual,
Involuntary Separation from Active Duty, a Marine must be
qualified
pay. In
reenlistment
height/weight/bodyfat standards,
fitness reports.
in order to receive full separation
case, he did not qualify for
failed to maintain
1900.7G, Separation Pay for
consistently
because he
and subsequently received adverse
Marine Corps Separation and
f_ully
Point of contact is Staff Sergeant
5.
278-9235.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03167-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 September 2002. reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. time from 22 December 2000 until 19 January 2001. for...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07033-00
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 6 February 2001. were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Additionally, an individual cannot be promoted if he is not within the Marine Corps height and weight standards. P1400.32B, Marine Corps Promotion Manual, Volume 2, Enlisted Promotions, provides that Marines assigned RE-3P...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03521-00
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. Reference (a) requests an advisory opinion on former Sergeant equest to have his records corrected to show that he was not discharged from the Marine Corps on 27 May 1999, and to further show that he is retired by reason of physical disability. MMEA concurs with the recommendation made by Mrs. Jr., Head, Separation...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1998 | 05583-98
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 23 March 1999. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CMC memorandum 1001/ 1 MMEA-6 of 17 February 1999, a copy of which is attached. - On 7 April 1997, u r n t e His current reenlistment was r enlistment contract was a probationary reenlistment contract.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08072-02
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. height, weight, and body fat as He was also not within established Marine Corps 73", 227 pounds, and The report at issue reflects the petitioner's weight standards for his 19%, Subi: J MARINE CORPS PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REVIEW BOARD ADVIS SERGE E CASE OF STAFF USMC (PERB) respectively (over...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 02791-07
In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by Commandant of the Marine Corps dated 11 June 2007, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01862-00
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. request to with back pay,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 09131-02
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the report of the Headquarters Marine Corps Performance Evaluation Review Board (PERB), dated 16 October 2002, a copy of which is attached. The failure of the petitioner's unit to ensure that his assignment to weight control was reflected in MCTFS does...
USMC | DRB | 2012_Marine | MD1201212
Relief denied.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain .The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing for 15 years from the date of discharge. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07166-01
It is noted that the Commandant of the Marine Corps (CMC) has directed removal of the contested fitness report for 1 January to 2 February 1996. The Board also considered your rebuttal letter dated 30 July 2002 with enclosures.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.In concluding that no further correction to your fitness report record...