D E P A R T M E N T O F T H E N A V Y
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAW ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 203704100
MEH: tj
Docket No: 35 10-99
17 August 1999
I
Dear
This is in reference to your application for correction of
provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.
your naval
record pursuant to the
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Kecords, sitting in executive
session, considered your application on 17 August 1999. Your allegations of error and injustice
were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the
proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your
application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory
opinion furnished by CMC Memorandum 100111 MMEA-6, a copy of which is attached.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurrd with the comments contained in
the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and votes of
the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision u p m submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this regard, it is important
to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records. Consequently,
when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
Enclosure
D E P A R T M E N T OF THE NAVY
H E A D Q U A R T E R S U N I T E D S T A T E S M A R I N E C O R P S
3280 R U S S E L L R O A D
Q U A N T I C O , V I R G I N I A 221 34-5 1 0 3
I N REPLY REFER TO:
1001/1
MMEA - 6
MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF
NAVAL RECORDS
OF SS
-
. - . +
USMC
1. We have carefully reviewed Staff Sergeant
and recommend that his request for an entitjlernent to a zone B
multiple of 2, Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) be denied.
s case
a 48 month reenlistment on
2 . Staff Sergeant -equested
5 March 1999, and was approved for a 48 mon h reenlistment on 11
March 1999. His expiration of active servi e (EAS) was 15 April
1999. He executed this reenlistment author'ty on 25 March 1999
updating his EAS to 24 March 2003. At the ime of his
reenlistment, Staff Sergeant
eligible for a zone B multiple in his primapy military
occupational specialty (PMOS) of 2531, however no bonus was
authorized for PMOS 2531. Therefore, Staff/ Sergeant
did not receive a bonus.
was Sergeant and was
I
I
was promoted to his present grade on
otion, his PMOS changed from 2531 to
3 . Staff Sergean
1 June 1999. wit
2537. He contends that since he had been selected for Staff
Sergeant at the time of his reenlistment, he should have received
a SRB for PMOS of 2537. Unfortunately, Stalff sergean-
executed his reenlistment authority on 24 March 1999, as a
Sergeant in PMOS 2531. No bonus was authorized. Selective
Reenlisment Bonus eligibility is dedicated to the PMOS held on
the date the reenlistment contract is executed.
4 . Point of contact is captain-
DSN *A
COLONEL. US. MARlNE CORPS
. ENLISTED ASSIGNMENT BRANCH
BY DlRECTlw OF THE COMMANOAHl OF THE MARINE COWS
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03156-01
You also made new requests to remove your relief for cause from recruiting duty, which was requested on 5 April 1999; your nonjudicial punishment of 29 March 1999; and your service record page 11 counseling entries dated 17 and 24 February 1999. We are asked to provide an advisory opinion on Petitioner's request for the removal from his Service Record Book (SRB) and his official military personnel file (OMPF) of all references to his nonjudicial punishment (NJP) of 29 March 1999 and...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07312-99
opinion furnished by CMC memorandum attached. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. ?#%S MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS Subj: BCNR DOCKET OF STAFF **1;, We have reviewed Staff Sergeant 1. his request for a contract modification and subsequent entitlement to a Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) be denied.
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 02525-99
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. Per MCO l6lO.llC, the Performance Evalu,~tion Review Board, with three members present, met on 9 April 1999 to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 01967-99
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. Per MCO 1610.11C, the Performance Evaluation Review Board, with three members resent, met on 16 March 1999 to consider Staff Sergean A t i t i o n contained in reference (a). Reference (b) is the performance evaluation directive governing submission of the report.
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 03415-99
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of p--+able material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 04433-99
It is noted that the Commandant of the Marine Corps (CMC) has removed your adverse fitness report for 17 October to 9 November 1998. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice warranting restoration of your drill instructor military occupational specialty (MOS) or your special duty assignment (SDA) pay. The memorandum will...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 03760-99
In addition, the Board considered the report of the Headquarters Marine Corps (HQMC) Performance Evaluation Review Board (PERB), dated 7 June 1999, and the memorandum furnished by HQMC dated 25 August 1999, copies of which are attached. c. First Sergean explanations into is no excuse for Officer and Adverse Sighting Officer. Contrary to the information included in subparagraph 3b of reference (b), further research indicates that the Adverse Sighting Officer (Lieutenant Colone fitness...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 03419-99
3 In addition, the Board considered the report of the Headquarters Marine Corps ~erfa/rmance Evaluation Review Board (PERB), dated 24 May 1999, a copy of which is attachM. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an' official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. Sincerelv W. DEAN PFEIFFER Executive Director Enclosure DEPARTMENT OF T H E NAVY H E A D Q U A R T E R S U N I T E D STATES M A R I N E C ~ R P...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1998 | 05583-98
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 23 March 1999. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CMC memorandum 1001/ 1 MMEA-6 of 17 February 1999, a copy of which is attached. - On 7 April 1997, u r n t e His current reenlistment was r enlistment contract was a probationary reenlistment contract.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 02766-03
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Report B - 940419 to 950228 (AN). c. While the advocacy letters from Captain-and Sample all speak highly of the Master Sergeants -and petitioner's performance during the period covered by Report B, the Board concludes that none of those three individuals were in the petitioner's direct...