D E P A R T M E N T O F T H E N A V Y
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAW ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100
BJG
Docket No: 4433-99
1 October 1999
Dear Staff serg-
..
.
This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.
It is noted that the Commandant of the Marine Corps (CMC) has removed your adverse
fitness report for 17 October to 9 November 1998. The contested documentation of your
relief for cause from drill instructor duty does not appear in your Official Military Personnel
File, so your request for its removal could not be considered.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
session, considered your application on 29 September 1999. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures
applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board
consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your
naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board
conxidrred the repmt of the Headquarters Marine Corps (HQMC) Performance Evaluation
Review Board (PERB), dated 9 July 1999 with enclosure, and the advisory opinion from the
HQMC-Manpower Management Enlisted Assignment Branch (MMEA), dated
25 Augiist 1999, a copy of which is attached. They also considered your rebuttal letter dated
15 September 1999 with enclosure.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice warranting restoration of your drill instructor military occupational specialty (MOS)
or your special duty assignment (SDA) pay. In this connection, the Board substantially
concurred with the advisory opinion. They were unable to find that the conduct of the other
three drill instructors who, you allege, were not relieved for cause was substantially identical
to yours. In any event, they found that your relief was clearly warranted. In view of the
above, your application for relief beyond that effected by CMC has been denied. The names
and votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be
taken. You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and
material evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this regard, it is
important to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the
applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
Enclosures
DEPARTMENT OF T H E NAVY
b
OQUARTERS U N I T E D STATES M A R I N E CORPS
3 2 8 0 R U S S E L L ROAD
QUANTICO, V I R G I N I A 22 134-5 1 0 3
IN REPLY REFER TO:
1610
MMER
9 Jul 99
MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF
NAVAL RECORDS
Encl: (1) Copy of CMC ltr 1610 MMER/PERB o f 9 Jul 99
r
OF STAFF SERGEANT-
SMC
1. , As evidenced by the enclosure, PERB removed from Staff Sergeant
fficial military record, the fitness report for the
7
to 981109 (CD).
2. We defer to BCNR on the remainder of Staff s e r g e a n '
requests.
Review Branch
Personnel Management Division
By direction of the Commandant
of the Marine Corps
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS
3280 RUSSELL ROAD
QUANTICO, VIRGINIA 22 130-5103
Ymvy REFER
MMER/ PERB
JUL - 8 1999
From: Commandant of t & g & j ~ i r y
To:
Subj : CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD
Ref: ( a ) MCO 1610.11C
1. Per the reference, the Performance Evaluation Review Board
has reviewed allegations of error and injustice in your Naval
record. Having reviewed all the racts ot record, the Board has
directed that your Naval record will be corrected by removing
therefrom the following fitness report:
Date of R e ~ o r t
Reportinu Senior
Period of Re~ort
17 Feb 99
981017 to 981109 (CD)
2 . There will be inserted in your Naval record a memorandum in
place of the removed report. The memorandum will contain
appropriate identifying data concerning the report and state that
it has been removed by direction of the Commandant of the Marine
Corps and cannot be made available in any form to selection
boards and reviewing authorities. It will also state that such
boards may not conjecture or draw any inference as to the nature
of the report or the events which may have precipitated it,
unless such events are otherwise properly a part of the official
record. The Automated Fitness Report System (the data base which
generates your Master Brief Sheet) will be corrected accordingly.
3. Since the remainder of your requests do not fall under the
purview of this Headquarters, your case is being forwarded to
the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) for final
resolution. Further inquiries should be directed to that agency
at-
DEPARTMENT OF T H E NAVY
HEADQUARTERS U N I T E D STATES MARINE CORPS
3 2 8 0 R U S S L L L ROAD
QUANTICO, VIRGINIA 22 1 3 4 - 5 1 0 3
IN REPLI[1RgIv TO:
MMEA
2 5 Aug 9 9
MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF
NAVAL RECORDS
OF STAFF SERG
USMC
Ref: (a) ALMAR 3 1 9 / 9 6
(b) ALMAR 2 6 2 / 9 7
(c) DepO 1 3 0 0 . 3 R
1. The packag
reinstate his
viewed and SS
' Special Duty
quest to
mended.
2. The following justification is provided.
not complete a successful three year
a. SS
. In accordance with reference (a),
tour as a d
Marines graduating from drill instructor school on or after 1 2
9 9 6 are required to complete a '36 month" tour. SSgt
raduated from drill instructor school on 1 8 December
as required to complete a three year tour. In
accordance with reference (b) to be considered a successful tour,
a Marine drill instructor must complete a minimum of 30 months to
be eligible to retain the AMOS 8 5 1 1 . SS
s relieved
for cause on 9 November 1 9 9 8 and thus di-
minimum time required to be considered a successful tour and
retain the 8 5 1 1 AMOS and special duty pay, accordingly.
the
relieved for cause because his
ust and confidence in his ability to
In accordance with reference ( c ) , upon
b. S
Commanding
train recru
approval by the Commanding General of a recommendation for the
relief of a drill instructor and voidance of the 8 5 1 1 AMOS, an
adverse fitness report will be submitted. The relief for cause
was approved by the Commanding General on 2 3 November 1 9 9 8 during
a request mast proceedings and was subsequently approved by HQMC
(MMEA) on 6 January 1 9 9 9 . The adverse fitness
in accordance with orders was removed from SSgt
official military record on 9 July 1 9 9 9 by PERB.
fitness report was written incorrectly as it did not address the
relief for cause due to "loss of trust and confidence" but
instead focused on "substantiated violations of depot orders"
which
court
way
his
d been found "not guilty" of at a special
moval of the adverse fitness r e ~ o r t in no
elief for cause an
special duty pay.
itted
rse
oidance of
id not
Subj :
OF STAFF SERGEAN
USMC
complete a successful tour on the drill field due to a relief for
cause. His 8511 AMOS and special duty pay were voided as
required.
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | Document scanned on Wed Nov 29 14_53_31 CST 2000
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 29 September 1999. In addition, the Board After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice warranting restoration of your drill instructor military occupational specialty (MOS) or your special duty assignment (SDA) pay. ...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 00379-02
You requested removal of your fitness reports for 1 March to 28 August 1998 and 1 October to 14 November 1998, as well as documentation of your relief for the good of the service from recruiting duty. ” CMC also “Recruited SNM was put on bed rest/no duty due to pregnancy problems/back problems. (2), the approval authority (GOS) relief from recruiting duty, has supports her request for Additionally, enclosure Based upon this review, 2. following errors require corrective action.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02098-00
Your request to enter a “CD” (change of duty) fitness report for 9 March to 10 April 1991, reflecting service in combat with the primary duty of adjutant, could not be considered, as you did not provide such a report. the Reporting Senior's actions in 3c is in no way an invalidating factor in Reference (b) did not contain a very filling out Item 3c and Subj: MARINE CORPS PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REVIEW BOARD (PERB) ADVISORY OPINION ON BCNR APPLICATION IN THE CASE OF...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 06191-01
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing the fitness report for 15 March to 14 August 2000, a copy of which is at enclosure (1). The Board, consisting of Messrs. Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 15 August 2001, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 04790-03
In addition, the Board considered the report of the Headquarters Marine Corps Performance Evaluation Review Board (PEW), dated 2 June 2003, a copy of which is attached. (6), concerning section A, item 8b (physical fitness test (PFT)) of the fitness report form, says "Use code 'NMED' [not medically qualified] if the MRO warine reported on] is unable to take or pass the PFT because of a physical (medical) condition." The "NMED" entry in Item 8b of the fitness report, whi.ch is further...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 05707-99
In correspondence attached as enclosure (3), the HQMC office having cognizance over the subject matter of Petitioner's request to strike his failure of selection for promotion has commented to the effect that this request has merit and warrants favorable action. Having reviewed all the facts of record, the Board has directed that your Naval record will be corrected by removing therefrom the following fitness reports: Date of Report Re~ortinq Senior Period of Report 29 Jan 87 21 Oct 87 28...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 03760-99
In addition, the Board considered the report of the Headquarters Marine Corps (HQMC) Performance Evaluation Review Board (PERB), dated 7 June 1999, and the memorandum furnished by HQMC dated 25 August 1999, copies of which are attached. c. First Sergean explanations into is no excuse for Officer and Adverse Sighting Officer. Contrary to the information included in subparagraph 3b of reference (b), further research indicates that the Adverse Sighting Officer (Lieutenant Colone fitness...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 05969-99
CONCLUSION: Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and especially in light of the contents of enclosure (3), the Board finds the existence of an injustice warranting limited relief, specifically, removal of Petitioner's failure of selection for promotion The Board finds that Petitioner's request for a special selection board should be denied. DEPARTMENT OF T H E NAVY H E A D Q U A R T E R S U N I T E D STATES M A R I N E CORPS 3 2 8 0 R U S S E L L ROAD QUANTICO, V I R...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05473-00
(6), the M arine Corps Recruiting Command ’s request to remove his page 11 entry should be MOS , and 2 In correspondence attached as enclosure (7), the HQMC Enlisted Assignment Branch (MI&A) has also commented to the effect that Petitioner ’s request to remove his page 11 entry should be approved, but his requests concerning his RFC should be denied. Point of contact is M ecommended that the Board equest for removal of the VMC 118(11), page 11 .entry dated Acting Head, Field Support...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 00839-02
D E P A R T M E N T O F T H E NAVY BOARD F O R C O R R E C T I O N OF NAVAL R E C O R D S 2 NAVY ANNEX W A S H I N G T O N D C 2 0 3 7 0 - 5 1 0 0 BJG Docket No: 839-02 25 February 2002 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD - - Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. As indicated in enclosure (2), the Headquarters Marine Corps (HQMC) Performance Evaluation Review Board (PERB) has directed the requested correction of Petitioner's...