DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAJAL RECORD
S
2 NAVY ANNE
X
WASHINGTON DC 20370-510
0
TRG
Docket No:
5 June 2001
6536-00
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the
States Code section 1552.
provisio:>s of Title 10 of the United
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 22 May 2001.
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
considerlad by the Board consisted of
Board.
your application, together with all material submitted in support
thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations
and policies.
allltgations of error and
Documentary material
Your
After careful and conscientious
record, the Board found that the
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice.
consilderation of the entire
evid'ance submitted was
The Board found that you enlisted in the Naval Reserve on 23
During the next 18 months you completed recruit
December 1963.
On 20
training, rate training and were advanced to SK3 (E-4).
The record shows
September 1965 you reported for active duty.
that you reported to Navy Support Activity, Danang on 26 October
1965 and remained there until 13 October 1966.
from active duty on 6 May 1969.
You were released
There is no evidence in your service or medical records to show
that you are entitled to the Combat Action Ribbon or the Purple
Heart.
to your record to show your entitlement to those awards.
Accordingly, your application has been denied.
votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.
there is no basis for a correction
Without such evidence,
The names and
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
You are entitled to have the
favorable action cannot be taken.
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error
or injustice.
Sincere].y,
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
' 2
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 08194-07
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 February 2008. You are requesting in effect, that your records be corrected wherever necessary to show that you have 90 days of continuous active duty. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04172-00
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 May 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and sub.mitted in support thereof, your pclicies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02050-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 October 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02254-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 2 October 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. The discharge authority directed an other than honorable discharge by reason of misconduct due to conviction by civil authorities of malicious conversion, and on 16 August 1965 you were so discharged. Consequently, when...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 07884-06
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You enlisted in the Marine Corps Reserve on 13 October 1965 at age 20, reported for your initial...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04674-01
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. An average of 3.0 in conduct was The Board, in its review of your entire record and application, carefully weighed all potentially mitigating factors, such as your prior honorable service, post service conduct, and your contention that the general discharge was unjust and too severe as...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05391-01
is returned with the recommendation that CAPT sure request, to add 126 days of additional active duty to his Statement of Service for Naval Reserve retirement, be denied. Therefore, this service, when performed, should have been documented in the member's permanent personnel record. s permanent personnel record contains no such orders, nor As an NROTC midshipmen Subj: REQUEST FOR COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04899-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 November 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of Board. After review by the discharge authority, the On 4 November 1977 the Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) changed the characterization of the discharge to general...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06124-00
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 3 April 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 12163-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 August 2011. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...