‘DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 TRG
Docket No: 8194-07
8 February 2008
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United
States Code section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 5 February 2008. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
your application, together with all material submitted in support
thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations
and policies.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice.
You enlisted in the Naval Reserve on 15 September 1964 with an 18
month delay for reporting to extended active duty. Subsequently,
you were issued active duty for training orders (ACDUTRA) to
attend recruit training and reported for training on 18 October
1964. You detached from recruit training on 5 January 1965. on
5 June 1965, you reported for 14 days of ACDUTRA and were
detached on 18 June 1965, a period of 14 days. On 30 November
1965 you were dropped from a drilling status because you were not
physically qualified and were honorably discharged for that
reason of 10 February 1967.
You are requesting in effect, that your records be corrected
wherever necessary to show that you have 90 days of continuous
active duty. The Record of Naval Reserve Service (page. 11) you
submitted properly shows that during the quarter ending on 31
December 1964, that you completed 75 days of ACDUTRA and the
remaining five days were credited in the next quarter (these
totals apparently include two days travel time).
In view of the foregoing, it appears that your service has been
properly computed and you have been treated no differently than
many others who participated in reserve programs. Therefore, the
Board concluded that a correction to your record to show
additional active service is not warranted.
Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and
votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
W yea
W. DEAN P
Executive Diite r
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080013644
The applicant states, in effect, that his military service records show his active duty service, but his discharge document does not show all of his active service. This document also shows the VA determined the applicants period of service in the USAR was from 26 August 1963 through 25 February 1964, for 6 months and 10 days of active duty for training purposes only. The instructions for block a, line 3, state self explanatory. b. Paragraph 52 (Item 24, block b) state to enter the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 06702-07
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.The Board found that you enlisted in the Marine Corps Reserve on 21 October 2002. On 28 March 2003...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 00941-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 6 Augugt 2008. On 6 March 1978 your commanding officer recommended that you be separated with a discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of unsatisfadtory participation due to your failure to attend regularly scheduled drills. : Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is existence of probable on the...
CG | BCMR | Other Cases | 2008-170
This final decision, dated April 16, 2009, is approved and signed by the three duly APPLICANT’S REQUEST AND ALLEGATIONS The applicant asked the Board to correct her record to show that the year of active service she performed from January 29, 1965, to January 28, 1966, was a year of active duty (AD) as opposed to a year of active duty for training (ADT). She was released from active military service on January 28, 1966, and discharged from the Reserve on January 25, 1968. Therefore, CGPC...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 08195-07
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX TRG WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 Docket No: 8195-07 6 May 2008 to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code section 1552. , Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 22 April 2008. your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 00414-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 September 2008. On 19 February 1986 your commanding officer recommended that you be separated with a discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of unsatisfactory participation due to your failure to attend regularly scheduled drills. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 00550-07
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 March 2008. On 29 May 1984 your commanding officer recommended that you be separated with a discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of unsatisfactory participation due to your failure to attend regularly scheduled drills. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 07728-08
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. On 11 January 1987 your commanding officer recommended that you be separated with a discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of unsatisfactory participation due to your failure to attend regularly scheduled drills. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 03077-07
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 April 2008. your application, thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 05017-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 November 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden ig on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...