DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD
S
2 NAVY ANNE
X
WASHINGTON DC 20370-510
0
CRS
Docket No: 4899-01
29 November 2001
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10, United
States Code, Section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 15 November 2001.
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
Board.
your application, together with all material submitted in support
thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations
and policies.
Your allegations of error and
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice.
The Board found that you enlisted in the Marine Corps on 17
October 1961 at age 17.
three nonjudicial punishments and were convicted by a summary
court-martial and a special court-martial.
unauthorized absences totalling
identification card, disobedience of a lawful order on two
occasions, absence from your appointed place of duty, and having
an unclear rifle and uniform.
The record reflects that you received
40 days, possession of a false
The offenses included
On 10 February 1965 an administrative discharge board recommended
that you be separated with an undesirable discharge by reason of
unfitness.
recommendation for separation was approved and you received an
undesirable discharge on 26 February 1965.
After review by the discharge authority, the
On 4 November 1977 the Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB)
changed the characterization of the discharge to general under
the provisions of the Special Discharge Review Program (SDRP).
However, on 15 February 1978 NDRB declined to confirm the general
discharge under its uniform discharge review standards, thus
denying you veterans' benefits.
However, these factors were not sufficient to
In its review of your application the Board carefully weighed all
potentially mitigating factors, such as your youth and
immaturity.
warrant further recharacterization of your discharge or
confirmation of the general discharge, given your frequent
The Board especially
involvement with military authorities.
noted the fact that you were the subject of five disciplinary
The Board
actions within a period of less than four years.
believed that the relief granted by the NDRB in accordance with
the provisions of the SDRP is sufficient in your case.
Accordingly, your application has been denied.
votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.
The names and
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
2
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 10278-09
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Your case was forwarded and it was directed that you receive an undesirable discharge by reason of misconduct due to civil conviction. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00611-99
Your military record shows that on 30 July 1971 you submitted a written request for an undesirable discharge in order to avoid trial by court-martial for two periods of unauthorized absence Your record also shows that prior to totalling 44 days. On 20 September 1977 the Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) changed the characterization of the discharge to general under the provisions of the Special Discharge Review Program (SDRP). Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08399-02
A three—member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 February 2003. On 10 June 1977 the Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) changed the characterization of the discharge to general under the provisions of the Special Discharge Review Program (SDRP). Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2000 | 03714-00
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. Pursuant to reference (a) a review of enclosure (1) was conducted to form opinions about the subject petitioner's claims that he suffered fiom Post Traumatic Stress Disorder at the time of his service and that this was a significant contributing factor to the misconduct that lead to his discharge. The misconduct that...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01211-01
Your A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Navy Records, sitting in executive session, 25 July 2001. reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. However, you continued to serve and were advanced to LCPL You reported to duty in Vietnam on 5 October 1968. On 28 August 1970 the discharge authority directed You were Prior to submitting this request court- The record further reflects that on 20 June 1977 the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05434-01
Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Your military record shows that on 10 February 1970 you submitted a written request for an undesirable discharge in order to avoid trial by court-martial for an unauthorized absence of nine days, two instances of willful disobedience of a lawful order, two instances of disrespect, theft of a jeep, assault, and possession of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 12499 11
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 2 October 2012. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 06860-11
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive seseion, considered your , application on i November 2011. However, neither the DVA nor the Department of Defense considers a general discharge issued by the SDRP to entitle you to any benefits denied by the original discharge. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02044-00
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 29 August 2000. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of Board. on 9 March 1969, you were On 15 December 1969 you received NJP for a two pay period punishment imposed was restriction for seven days and You were sentenced...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07518-00
he had been granted an honorable discharge by the Department of the Navy, but that this decision was reversed by the Marine Corps. b. Mr. documentation that the patient manifested symptoms of PTSD immediately following his return from Vietnam, and that these symptoms led to the patient's undesirable discharge in 1970. result of the patient's Vietnam combat experiences.