DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD
S
2 NAVY ANNE
X
WASHINGTON DC 20370-510
0
LCC: ddj
Docket No:
2 October 2001
5391-01
This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section
1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session,
considered your application on 2 October 2001.
reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the
proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your
application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
opinion furnished by NPC memorandum 5420 Pers 91 1 of
attached.
In addition, the Board considered the advisory
Your allegations of error and injustice were
5 September 2001, a copy of which is
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in
the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and votes of
the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this regard, it is important
to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records. Consequently,
ofticial naval record, the burden is on the applicant to
when applying for a correction of an
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
upon submission of new and material
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
Enclosure
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAV
NAVY PERSONNEL COMMAND
5720 INTEGRITY DRIVE
MILLINGTON TN 38055-0000
Y
5420
Pers-911
5 Sep 01
MEMORANDUM FOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF
NAVAL RECORDS
Via:
Assistant for BCNR Matters (PERS-OOZCB)
Subj:
Ref:
(c
(d
(e
if
N CASE OF
1533.12F of 14 May 98
CNETINST
42 COMPGEN 669; B-150780, June 7, 1963
45 COMPGEN 363; B-158027, December 20, 1965
Title
MILPERSMAN 1070-020
NRPC
ltr 1070 N212
of 15 Jun 01
10 U.S.C.
.-
,
Encl:
(1) BCNR memo 5420 PERS-OOZCB of 29 Aug
01
(3.) is returned with the recommendation that CAPT
sure
request, to add 126 days of additional active duty to
his Statement of Service for Naval Reserve retirement, be denied.
Per reference (a), the summer training period held annually
2.
for NROTC midshipmen students is normally four to eight weeks in
a scholarship student is in
length for each of the three summers
References (b) and (c) authorized the active
the NROTC program.
service of an officer as a midshipman as creditable service under
section 1405 of reference (d).
documents that reflect an officer's entitlements, and affect or
influence a member's career and benefits, will be filed in the
permanent personnel record maintained by COMNAVPERSCOM.
Therefore, this service, when performed, should have been
documented in the member's permanent personnel record.
In accordance with reference (e),
appol
's permanent personnel record shows
ent as a midshipman in the NROTC
3.
A review of CAPT
that he accepted an
program on September 23, 1960, and was later commissioned as an
Ensign in the U.S. Navy on June 3, 1964.
student, each summer training period should have been authorized
These orders would have been endorsed
via official Navy orders.
(upon both his arrival and departure and would have been required
CAPT
when he filed his travel claim at the end of the cruise.
s permanent personnel record contains no such orders, nor
As an NROTC midshipmen
Subj:
REQUEST FOR COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS. IN CASE OF
,*.
documentati.on,
any other
vouchers, travel or subvouchers, training records etc.), to
vaiidate his claims that his summer training periods were
performed.
(for example, page 13 entries, pay
.
4.
The number of actual days served by NROTC students on each
summer training cruise can vary from as little as 21 to as many
as 56.
.a
Additionally, students are sometimes excused from
summer training period for valid reasons.
Because of these
variations, specific documentation is required to verify the
actual number of days spent on summer training cruises before an
adjustment can be made to a retirement point record.
Accordingly, in the absence of any such documentation, we
5.
recommend CAPT
he continue to pursue this matter as advised in reference (f).
Documentation does not have to be provided before his retirement
pay eligibility date in May 2002.
submitted after May 2002
any additional retirement pay entitlement.
wo*uld result in a retroactive payment of
's petition be denied.
We also recommend
Documentation that is
6. We regret a more favorable response is not possible
instance.
at DSN 882-4497 or commercial
Point of contact in this matter is Mr.
(901) 874-4497.
in this
Director, Naval Reserve Personnel
Administration Division
2
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08012-02
& accordance with administrative regulations and A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 December 2002. (1) BCNR memo !5420 PERS-OOZCB of 5 Nov 02 Enclosure (1) is returned with the recommendation that CAPT s request to add 30 days of additional active duty to his ement of Service for Naval Reserve retirement, be denied. training periods held annually for NROTC midshipmen students as creditable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04354-02
opinion furnished by NPC memorandum 5420 Pers attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. (c) authorized the summer training of an officer as a non-academy midshipman as creditable service under section 1405 of reference (d).
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02248-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 September 2002. reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Therefore, we can not recommend just adding 126 days active duty to his Statement of Service for his Naval Reserve Retirement Subj: REQUEST FOR COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS IN CASE OF unless we have documentation in order to support...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01307-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 30 May 2001. opinion furnished by BUPERS memorandum 7220 is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02272-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 June 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02324-01
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by NPC memorandum 1780 PERS-604 dated 30 May 2001, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2004 | 04714-04
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statute s, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant t demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. Reference (a request comments and recommendations in subject’s case.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04663-01
Sincerely, W. DEAN PFEIFFER Executive Director Enclosures DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 TRG Docket No: 4663-01 2 April 2003 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD 0 ~mIuu-.m”~ Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. In response to congressional interest in Petitioner’s case, Headquarters Marine Corps stated, in part, as follows: ... On September 22, 1999, (Petitioner)...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07736-01
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 TRG Docket No: 14 May 2002 7736-01 Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records Secretary of the Navy RECORD OFH (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Therefore, the Board concludes that the recoupment action should be suspended until he completes the two year active duty requirement he incurred while in NROTC. RECOMMENDATION: That Petitioner's naval record be corrected to show that a. recoupment of his...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05858-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 3 December 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...