Y
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAV
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 203704100
TJR
Docket No: 6210-99
13 June 2000
Dear
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10, United
States Code, Section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 6 June 2000.
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board.
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
your application, together with all material submitted in support
thereof, your naval record,
and applicable statutes, regulations,
and policies.
Your allegations of error and
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient
to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice.
The Board found you enlisted in the Marine Corps on 8 June 1998
at the age of 17.
Your record reflects that you served without
disciplinary incident.
you were diagnosed with a
The
Your record further reflects that on 8 April 1999, after
undergoing a psychiatric examination,
personality disorder and an adjustment disorder.
psychiatrist also opined that you were a danger to yourself and
others and recommended you for an administrative separation.
Subsequently, you were processed for discharge by reason of
convenience of the government due to the diagnosed personality
disorder.
officer to issue you a general discharge by reason of convenience
of the government and on 26 May 1999 you were so discharged.
Because you were not recommended for reenlistment you were
assigned an RR-4 reenlistment code at this time.
The discharge authority directed your commanding
The Board, in its review of your entire record and application,
carefully weighed all potentially mitigating factors, such as
your youth and immaturity,
and your contention that you would
However, the Board concluded these
like your reenlistment code changed now that you are competent to
serve in the Marine Corps.
factors were not sufficient to warrant a change in your
reenlistment code given the diagnosed personality disorder.
Board also noted that the record contains no evidence, and you
submitted none, to support your contention that you no longer
have either a personality disorder or an adjustment disorder.
Given all the circumstances of your case, the Board concluded
your reenlistment code was proper and no change is warranted.
Accordingly, your application has been denied.
The
The Board also noted that you are entitled to submit the attached
Application for the Review of Discharge or Dismissal from the
Armed Forces of the United States (DD Form 293) to the Naval
Council of Personnel Boards, attention:
Board, Building 36, Fourth Floor, Washington Navy Yard, 901 M
Street, S. E., Washington,
upgrade of your discharge and a change in your narrative reason
for discharge.
DC 20374-5023 for consideration of an
Naval Discharge Review
The names and votes of the members of the panel will be furnished
upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
You are entitled to have the
favorable action cannot be taken.
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.
Enclosure
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
2
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 10311-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 30 April 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
USMC | DRB | 2002_Marine | MD02-00345
MD02-00345 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 020129, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable, with a favorable reentry code. The narrative reason for my discharge is noted as a "personality disorder". 000523: Commanding Officer recommended discharge under honorable conditions (general) for the convenience of the government due to a personality disorder, based upon a medical diagnoses of suffering from a...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 02800-99
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 July 1999. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03484-01
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. questioned the authority of seniors all of which were inconsistent On 11 August 2000 the GCMCA reviewed your case and directed an honorable discharge and assignment of an RE-3G reenlistment code. While Marine Corps regulations authorize the assignment of an RE-3P reenlistment code to Marines...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 06809-07
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.On 15 June 2000, you enlisted in the Navy at age 21. On 13 June 2001, you were separated with a...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 06098-01
evaluated by a Navy Psychologist and recommended for separation from the Marine Corps basic training due to failure to adapt. An entry level separation and problems related to You were diagnosed with a On 9 June 1999 you were notified that separation action was being initiated by reason of convenience of the government due to defective enlistment and induction due to erroneous enlistment as evidenced by the diagnosed personality disorder. You were so discharged on 17 June 1999...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 04744-10
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. In February 1994 you were processed for an administrative separation by reason of convenience of the government due to your diagnosed personality disorder. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04975-01
you were recommended for an Subsequently, you were processed for an administrative separation by reason of erroneous entry due to the diagnosed personality disorder. The Board, in its review of your entire naval record and application, carefully weighed all potentially mitigating factors, such as your youth and immaturity, prior service in the Marine Corps, and your contention that a therapist found little or no evidence of the diagnosed personality disorder. Further, the Board noted that...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07334-00
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 June 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The Board concluded that a record, which included a disciplinary action and adverse performance evaluations was sufficient to support the assignment...
USMC | DRB | 2001_Marine | MD01-00076
The applicant requested a documentary record discharge review. I have since then been diagnosed as not having a personality disorder. Accordingly, partial relief is granted.The Board carefully considered the applicant’s request for an upgrade to Honorable by reason of Convenience of the Government, and found that other than his diagnosis of Personality disorder with suicidal ideation, the applicant had no adverse marks in his service record.