Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03484-01
Original file (03484-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD

S

2 NAVY ANNE

X

WASHINGTON DC 20370.510

0

ELP
Docket No. 3484-01
21 September 2001

Dear

This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10, United
States Code, Section 1552.

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Navy Records,
sitting in executive session,
19 September 2001.
reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and
procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board.
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your
application, together with all material submitted in support
thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations
and policies.

Your allegations of error and injustice were

considered your application on

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice.

You enlisted in the Navy on 11 August 1997 for four years at age
20.
The record reflects that you were advanced to RP3 (E-4) and
served without incident until 23 June 2000,
from the field medical service school.
diagnosed with an unspecified personality disorder and
administrative separation was recommended.
The fact and
circumstances surrounding your referral for a psychiatric
evaluation are not on file in available records.

On 29 June 2000 you were

when you were dropped

On 7 July 2000 you were notified that administrative separation
action was being initiated by reason of convenience of the
government due to the diagnosed personality disorder.
consulted with legal counsel,
elected to submit a&statement in
your own behalf and to have the general court-martial convening
authority 
officer recommended discharge by reason of the personality
disorder.

Thereafter, the commanding
In his recommendation, he stated you had a history of

(GCMCA) review your case.

You

disrespect towards seniors,
and had anger management issues,
with Naval service.

questioned the authority of seniors
all of which were inconsistent

On 11 August 2000 the GCMCA reviewed your case and directed an
honorable discharge and assignment of an RE-3G reenlistment code.
You were so discharged on the same date.

The Board specifically noted the undated

Regulations authorize the assignment of an RE-3G reenlistment
code to individuals discharged by reason of a diagnosed
personality disorder.
copy of the GCMCA's action you provide which indicates assignment
of an RE-3P reenlistment code was directed.
that at the time, you were assigned to a Marine Corps command.
While Marine Corps regulations authorize the assignment of an
RE-3P reenlistment code to Marines discharged for   a personality
disorder, this code is assigned to Navy personnel only if they
are discharged for physical disability.
It is apparent the
Marine Corps realized you had to be processed according Navy
regulations, and the 
action directed an RE-3G reenlistment code.
of the GCMCA's action filed in your record.
treated no differently than others discharged under similar
circumstances, the Board could find not error or injustice in
your assigned reenlistment code.
Accordingly, your application
has been denied. The names and votes of the members of the panel
will be furnished upon request.

Enclosed is a copy
Since you were

The Board also noted

GCMCA's action was re-executed.

The new

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such
that favorable action cannot be taken.
the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and
material evidence or other matter not previously considered by
the Board. In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.

You are entitled to have

Sincerely,

W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director

Enclosure



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 06578-08

    Original file (06578-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 March 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03502-02

    Original file (03502-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    discharge by reason of personality disorder, and were assigned an RE-4 reenlistment code. Enclosed is a DD Form 293, which you may use However, it cannot change a NDRB is Accordingly, your application has been denied. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04975-01

    Original file (04975-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    you were recommended for an Subsequently, you were processed for an administrative separation by reason of erroneous entry due to the diagnosed personality disorder. The Board, in its review of your entire naval record and application, carefully weighed all potentially mitigating factors, such as your youth and immaturity, prior service in the Marine Corps, and your contention that a therapist found little or no evidence of the diagnosed personality disorder. Further, the Board noted that...

  • USMC | DRB | 2001_Marine | MD01-00664

    Original file (MD01-00664.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    [Documented personality disorder]. 000818: Commanding officer recommended discharge under honorable conditions (general) for the convenience of the government due to a personality disorder, based upon a diagnosed personality disorder as evidenced by psychological evaluation. However, the NDRB is authorized to consider outstanding post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge, to the extent that such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01885-01

    Original file (01885-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    15 December 1998 and assigned an RE-3P reenlistment code. You were honorably discharged on Incident to your The Board also noted your contentions that the medical incident was a transient The Board noted the letters of Regulations authorize the assignment of an RE-3P or RE-4 reenlistment code to individuals who are discharged by reason of a diagnosed personality disorder. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 09402-09

    Original file (09402-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 June 2010. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8639 13

    Original file (NR8639 13.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 18 June 2014. The Board noted that an RE-3P is the most favorable reentry code that may be assigned to individuals who are separated by reason of a diagnosed personality disorder. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 06033-01

    Original file (06033-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    You requested that your reenlistment code of RE-3P (failure to meet physical (medical) standards) be changed. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. send his application directly to the Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records, Department of the Navy, Washington, DC 20370-5100. to his application.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 02955-03

    Original file (02955-03.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. In addition, the Board noted that your DD Form 214 erroneously indicates that you were discharged...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08322-00

    Original file (08322-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board, in its review of your entire record and application, carefully weighed all potentially mitigating factors, such as your honorable service and your contention that your narrative reason for separation and reenlistment code are administrative errors because you served without any disciplinary actions. Accordingly, your application has been This disorder constituted a physical the narrative reason for separation is an RE-3P reenlistment code was Given all the circumstances of The...