DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD
S
2 NAVY ANNE
X
WASHINGTON DC 20370.510
0
TJ R
Docket No: 4975-01
7 January 2002
Dear
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10, United
States Code, Section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 3 January 2002.
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
Board.
your application, together with all material submitted in support
thereof, your naval record,
and applicable statutes, regulations,
and policies.
Your allegations of error and
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient
to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice.
The Board found you first enlisted in the Marine Corps on 26
April 1999 at the age of 20.
On 13 July 1999 you received an
uncharacterized entry level separation by reason of fraudulent
entry and were assigned an
RR-3P reenlistment code.
On 7 February 2000, after undergoing a psychiatric
Your record reflects that on 19 January 2000 you enlisted in the
Navy.
evaluation for suicidal thoughts and self-mutilating ideation,
you were diagnosed with an occupational problem and a borderline
personality disorder which existed prior to your enlistment. As
a result of the foregoing diagnosis,
administrative separation.
you were recommended for an
Subsequently, you were processed for an administrative separation
by reason of erroneous entry due to the diagnosed personality
disorder.
On 10 February 2000 the discharge authority directed
an uncharacterized entry level separation by reason of erroneous
entry, and on 17 February 2000 you were so discharged and
assigned an RR-4 reenlistment code.
The Board, in its review of your entire naval record and
application, carefully weighed all potentially mitigating
factors, such as your youth and immaturity, prior service in the
Marine Corps, and your contention that a therapist found little
or no evidence of the diagnosed personality disorder.
the Board concluded these factors and contention were not
sufficient to warrant a change of your reenlistment code.
code is authorized when an individual is separated due to a
diagnosed personality disorder and often assigned when there is a
risk of self-harm, such as suicidal ideations or other
indications that an individual is at risk for self-harm.
Further, the Board noted that there is no evidence in the record,
and you submitted none,
to negate the diagnosis of a personality
disorder.
concluded your reenlistment code was proper and no change is
warranted.
Given all the circumstances of your case, the Board
Accordingly, your application has been denied.
However,
Such a
The names and votes of the members of the panel will be furnished
upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
2
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03352-01
On 20 July 2000 you were notified of separation processing based In connection with this on the diagnosed personality disorder. You state in your application that you ideation in order to gain separation from the Navy. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 00430-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Navy Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 May 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. You claimed recurrent suicidal ideation since arriving at recruit training and stabbed yourself because "Nobody would listen to me...now they are listening."
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 04420-06
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You enlisted in the Navy on 8 February 1999 at age 20. on 18 January 2000 you were counseled regarding...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 00532-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Navy Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 May 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Regulations authorize the assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code to individuals separated by reason of a diagnosed personality disorder.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 01247-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 May 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of Board. Regulations allow for the assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code when an individual is separated by reason of a diagnosed personality disorder and such a code is...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04638-01
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. As a result of this diagnosis, you were recommended for an administrative separation\ ‘\ On 17 September 1997 you were notified of pending administrative separation action by reason of convenience of the government due to the diagnosed personality disorder. Consequently, when applying for...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 05629-07
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You enlisted in the Navy on 26 October 1995 at age 17 and served without disciplinary incident.On 4...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06296-01
separated under similar circumstances, the Board could find no The error or injustice in your assignment reenlistment code. to that board. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 06002-01
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. the discharge authority directed an uncharacterized entry level separation by reason of personality disorder. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03886-01
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. the discharge authority Thereafter, You did not You were The fact that you did not receive The Board noted your contention to the effect that you During classification interviews in recruit it is determined whether an individual is qualified for "A" school, even though you had and as a result...