Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 04744-10
Original file (04744-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100

 

TUR
Docket No: 4744-10
7 March 2011

 

This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10, United
States Code, Section 1552.

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 2 March 2011. The names and votes of the

members of the panel will be furnished upon request. Your
allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance
with administrative regulations and procedures applicable te the
proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by
the Board consisted of your application, together with all
material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and
applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient
to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice.

You enlisted in the Marine Corps on 30 July 1991 at age 17 and
served without disciplinary incident for about six months.
However, on 17 January 1992, you received nonjudicial punishment
(NJP) for underage drinking and being drunk in public. Further,
your record reflects that during the period from 27 October 1992
to 25 April 1994 you were counselled on eight occasions for
deficiencies in your performance and conduct.

On 13 July 1993, after being hospitalized for complaints of
multiple life stressors and reports of suicidal ideation, you
were diagnosed with an adjustment disorder, marital discord,
occupation problems, and a severe personality disorder which
rendered you incapable of adequately serving. The psychiatric
report stated, in part, that you represented a continuing risk. to
yourself and others and as such should be expeditiously processed
for an administrative separation. On 13 August 1993 you were
reevaluated due to your suicidal ideation and recommended for an
administrative separation due to your diagnosed adjustment
disorder with depressed mood and a personality disorder with
passive aggressive borderline features which rendered you
unsuitable for further service.

In February 1994 you were processed for an administrative
separation by reason of convenience of the government due to your
diagnosed personality disorder. Your commanding officer
recommended discharge under honorable conditions by reason of

convenience of the government due to the diagnosed personality

asorder. Subsequently, $2 25 July 1994, the discharge authority
j;approved thig recommendatién and directed a general discharge by
 Yeason of cotivenietice of the government. On 3 August 1994, while
serving in paygradé E-3, you were so discharged and assigned an
RE-3C reenlistment code.

The Board, in its review of your entire record and application,
carefully weighed all potentially mitigating factors, such as
your youth and desire to change your narrative reason for
separation and reenlistment code. Nevertheless, the Board
concluded these factors were not sufficient to warrant relief in
your case because of the seriousness of your misconduct and
severity of your diagnosed personality disorder, both of which
resulted in your nonrecommendation for retention and
reenlistment. Accordingly, your application has been denied.

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.

Sincerely,

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 08086-07

    Original file (08086-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 30 October 2007. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regu1atio~ 5 and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05132-02

    Original file (05132-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 November 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. On 22 May 1992 the discharge authority approved an Your were so discharged on 28 May 1992 and Regulations authorize the assignment of an RE-4 or RE-3G reenlistment code to an individual separated by reason...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 00532-02

    Original file (00532-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Navy Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 May 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Regulations authorize the assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code to individuals separated by reason of a diagnosed personality disorder.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2000_Navy | ND00-00805

    Original file (ND00-00805.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Based on his performance to date and the recommendation of Naval Hospital, Portsmouth, separation from active duty is highly encouraged.941206: BUPERS directed the applicant's discharge honorable by reason of convenience of the government on the basis of a personality disorder in accordance with NAVMILPERSMAN, Article 3620200. PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW Discussion The applicant was discharged on 941129 honorable for convenience of the government on the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 09027-08

    Original file (09027-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all Material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable Statutes, regulations, and policies. On 2 June 1995, your commanding officer forwarded your case to the separation authority, recommending a general discharge. Applicable regulations authorize the assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code to individuals who are separated due to a diagnosed personality disorder.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 03883-11

    Original file (03883-11.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 February 2012. On 19 April 1994, you were honorably discharged due to the diagnosed personality disorders. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 04582-08

    Original file (04582-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Furthermore, regulations authorize assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code to members who are discharged due to a diagnosed personality disorder and are considered a risk to harm themselves or others if retained. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 11326-07

    Original file (11326-07.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 TUR Docket No: 11326-07 14 November 2008 This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10, United States Code, Section 1552. A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 November 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 11328-10

    Original file (11328-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 July 2011. On 24 November 1993, you received an honorable discharge due to the diagnosed personality disorder. Whether or not you are eligible for benefits based on your period of service is a matter under the cognizance of the Department of Veterans Affairs (DVA).

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 06002-01

    Original file (06002-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. the discharge authority directed an uncharacterized entry level separation by reason of personality disorder. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.