DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD
S
2 NAVY ANNE
X
WASHINGTON DC 20370-510
0
Docket No: 5818-01
8 January 2002
This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
session, considered your application on 8 January 2002. Your allegations of error and injustice
were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the
proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your
application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
opinion furnished by NAVCRUITCOM memorandum 1133 Ser
copy of which is attached.
In addition, the Board considered the advisory
N32/6492 of 23 October 2001, a
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in
the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and votes of
the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this regard, it is important
to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
Consequently,
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
Enclosure
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVY RECRUITING COMMAND
5722 INTEGRITY DR.
MILLlNGTON.TENNESSEE
38%4-5057
Ser
N32
23 OCT 01
/6492
From:
To:
Subj:
Ref:
Commander,
Executive Director,
Navy Recruiting Command
Board for Correction of Naval Records
BCNR REQUEST ICO
(a) COMNAVCRUITCOMINST
(b) NAVPERS
1130.8F
1070/13 of 19 May 00
Encl:
(1) BCNR Docket Nr. 05818-01
Recommend disapproval of enclosure (1).
1.
The PRISE III
program was not offered due to the applicant not being eligible
for the program.
the PRISE III program
provides
NAVETs in ineligible ratings to convert to a rating
listed on the NAVET matrix.
Per references (a) and
(b),
applicant was briefed to submit a SRB pre-cert to BUPERS
(NPC-815) for SRB eligibility upon reporting to her first duty
station.
Per reference (a),
This is an advisory memorandum for use by the Board for
2.
Correction of Naval Records only.
Enclosure (1) is returned.
By direction
/
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05478-01
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. 05478-01 except for paygrade for accessions via the PRISE III program is Recommend disapproval of enclosure 1. the maximum E-3, Field(NF).
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05170-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 27 December 2001. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NAVCRUITCOM memorandum 1133 Ser a copy of which is attached. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07437-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 18 December 2001. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NAVCRUITCOM memorandum 1133 Ser a copy of which is attached N32/06521 of 6 December 2001, After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07656-02
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. Time in rate is always assigned as the year of re-entry into the Navy for NAVETS returning in a lower paygrade.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06832-01
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NAVCRUITCOM memorandum 1133 Ser of which is attached. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07972-02
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Sincerely, W. DEAN PFEIFFER Executive Director Enclosure DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY NAVY RECRUITING COMMAND 5722 INTEGRITY DR. MILLINGTON. Time in rate is always assigned as the year of re-entry into the Navy for NAVETS returning in a lower paygrade.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02208-02
mh MEH: Docket No: 2208-02 9 July 2002 DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD S 2 NAVY ANNE X WASHINGTON DC 20370.510 0 Dear This is in reference to your application provisions of title 10 of the IJnitetl States Code, section 1552. for correction of your naval record pursuant to the OI,I for accord;mce with A three-member panel of the Hoard session, considered your application were reviewed in proceedings of this application, together with applicable statutes, opinion...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01867-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 June 2001. opinion furnished by NAVCRUITCOM memorandum 1133 SER copy of which is attached. (b), applicant enlisted into PN rating under PRISE III 1. and program.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 01395-02
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by NAVCRUITCOM memorandum copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04780-02
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by CNRC memorandum 1133 Ser is attached. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.