DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD
FORCORRECTIONOFNAVAL RECORD
S
2 NAVY ANNE
X
WASHINGTON DC 20370-510
0
JLP: ddj
Docket No: 1867-01
212 June 2001
This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session,
considered your application on 12 June 2001. Your allegations of error and injustice were
reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the
proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your
application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
opinion furnished by NAVCRUITCOM memorandum 1133 SER
copy of which is attached.
In addition, the Board considered the advisory
334/06294 of 21 May 2001, a
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in
the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and votes of
the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this regard, it is important
to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records. Consequently,
when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
Enclosure
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAW
NAVY RECRUITING COMMAND
5722 INTEGRITY DR.
MILLINGTON, TENNESSEE 38054-5057
IN REPLY REFER
To:
1133
Ser
21 May 01
X34/66294
Commander,
Executive Director,
Navy Recruiting Command
’
Board for Correction of Naval Records
1
BCNR REQUEST
ICO
(a) COMNAVCRUITCOMINST
(b) BUPERS
(c) PHONCON BUPERS
ltr 1130 Ser
(N132D15) S
COMNAVCRUITCOM (N31226) YN
1130.8F
N132C4/9U97760 of 18 May 99
of 18 May 01
From:
To:
Subj:
Ref:
Encl:
(1) BCNR Docket Nr. 01867-01
The maximum
paygrade for accessions via the PRISE III
Recommend disapproval of enclosure (1).
(b), applicant enlisted into PN rating under PRISE III
1.
and
program.
program is E-3,
the Nuclear Field (NF).
offered E-4 into the MS rating or E-3 into the PN rating and
applicant chose the PN rating.
NAVETs guaranteed AECF,
except for
Per reference (c), the applicant was
CT1 (N), or
Per references (a)
This is an advisory memorandum for use by the Board for
2.
Correction of Naval Records
is returned.
r
By direction
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05818-01
opinion furnished by NAVCRUITCOM memorandum 1133 Ser copy of which is attached. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. Per reference (a), This is an advisory memorandum for use by the Board for 2.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03718-01
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by NAVCRUITCOM memorandum 1133 SER copy of which is attached. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05170-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 27 December 2001. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NAVCRUITCOM memorandum 1133 Ser a copy of which is attached. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05478-01
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. 05478-01 except for paygrade for accessions via the PRISE III program is Recommend disapproval of enclosure 1. the maximum E-3, Field(NF).
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05318-01
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by copy of which is attached. In addition, the Board considered the advisory NAVCRIJITCOM memorandum 1133 Ser 334/06482 of 1 October 2001, a After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06832-01
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NAVCRUITCOM memorandum 1133 Ser of which is attached. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07656-02
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. Time in rate is always assigned as the year of re-entry into the Navy for NAVETS returning in a lower paygrade.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07972-02
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Sincerely, W. DEAN PFEIFFER Executive Director Enclosure DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY NAVY RECRUITING COMMAND 5722 INTEGRITY DR. MILLINGTON. Time in rate is always assigned as the year of re-entry into the Navy for NAVETS returning in a lower paygrade.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08323-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 18 December 2001. N32/6110 of 20 November opinion furnished by NAVCRUITCOM memorandum 1133 Ser 2001, a copy of which is attached. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07437-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 18 December 2001. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NAVCRUITCOM memorandum 1133 Ser a copy of which is attached N32/06521 of 6 December 2001, After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error...