Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05222-01
Original file (05222-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD

S

2 NAVY ANNE

X

WASHINGTON DC 20370-510

0

MEH:ddj
Docket No: 5222-01
10 October 2001

This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title  

IJnited States Code, section  

IO of the  

1552.

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
session, considered your application on IO October 200  
were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the
proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your
application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations  
BUPERS 
opinion furnished by  
which is attached.

In addition, the Board considered the advisory

and policies.
Illeliioranduln 1 

of 17 September 2001, a copy of

1 
. Your allegations of error and injustice

160 PERS 

81 

1 

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially   concurred with the comments contained in
the advisory  opinion. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and votes of
the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records. Consequently,
when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or

In this regard, it is important

iii_justice.

 

 

’

Sincerely,

W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director

Enclosure

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

MAW  

?LRSONWEL  COMMAND

5720 

INTEORITY 

DRIVL

YlLLllDTON  

TN 

~8055-0000

MEMORANDUM FOR CHAIRMAN, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

Via:

PERS-OOZCB

Subj:

BCNR PETITION 

ICO

1160
PERS-811
17 Sep 01

Ref:

SNM's  DD Form 149 dtd 28 Jun 01

(a) 
(b) NAVADMIN  

132/99

Encl:

(1) BCNR File

In response to reference (a),

1.
petitioner's request.

recommend disapproval to the

a.

The petitioner reenlisted on 21 October  

1999 for three

years to continue active service.
SRB entitlement for the  
reenlisted.

DK(OOO0)  rate at the time the petitioner

Reference (b) listed a zone "A"

b.

The petitioner requests to receive the zone "A" SRB

offered in reference (b).
reflects that he's a Branch Class   32 USNR(TAR).
only offers the SRB to members with Branch Class 11 USN.
Therefore,

the petitioner is ineligible for SRB entitlement

Unfortunately,

the petitioner's records

Reference 

(b)

In view of the above,

2 .
as is.

recommend the petitioner's record remain

This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use by the

3.
Board for Correction of Naval Records
is returned.

(BCNR)

only.

Enclosure (1)

eenlistment

Incentives Branch



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06028-01

    Original file (06028-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 January 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. recommend the petitioner's record This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use by 3. the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05254-01

    Original file (05254-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by NPC memorandum I60 Pers 8 1 I attached. recommend the petitioner's record remain This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use by the 3.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05164-01

    Original file (05164-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. The petitioner reenlisted on 25 September 2000 for four Reference (b) provides a zone OS(O304) rate/NEC at the time th e years to continue active service. recommend the petitioner's record remain This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for the use by Enclosure 3. the Board for Correction of Naval Records (1)...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05176-01

    Original file (05176-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 30 October 200 were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. reference (a), recommend...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05650-01

    Original file (05650-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    opinion furnished by NPC memorandum attached. Sincerely, W. DEAN PFEIFFER Executive Director Enclosure DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY NAVY S720 PIRSOWWIL COMMAND INTLDRITY DRIVE YlLLlnDtOr TN 28015-0000 MEMORANDUM FOR CHAIRMAN, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS Via: PERS-OOZCB Subj: Ref: N ICO SNM's DD Form 149 dtd 18 Jul 01 (a) (b) MILPERSMAN 1160-100 (c) MILPERSMAN 1510-02 0 Encl: (1) BCNR File In response to reference (a), 1. petitioner's request. This is an advisory memorandum to reference...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03241-02

    Original file (03241-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Consequently, on the applicant to when applying for a correction of an official naval record, demonstrate the existence of probable material error or the burden is in.justice. SRB entitlement for the petitioner's reenlistment. recommend the petitioner's record This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use 3. by the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02284-01

    Original file (02284-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Sincerely, W. DEAN PFEIFFER Executive Director Enclosure DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY NAVY 5750 YlLLlllDTOW ,LRSOWWEL COMMAND IWTEQRITY DRIVE TN 38055-0000 1160 PERS-815 11 Jun 01 MEMORANDUM FOR CHAIRMAN, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS Via: Subj: Ref: PERS-OOZCB BCNR PETITION ICO SNM's DD...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08684-00

    Original file (08684-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 27 March 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Additionally, per reference (c), the zone e. The petitioner requests to backdate the three year reenlistment of 30 August 1999 to 26 April 1999 and...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05771-00

    Original file (05771-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 March 2001. In addition, the Board considered the advisory After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. orders in June 2000 and was in a student status on 01 August 2000. d. The petitioner was advised that he...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04438-01

    Original file (04438-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Per reference (b), members not SRB eligible who agree to obliserve to train and reenlist for service in a rating or NEC that at the time of the agreement is designated for award of SRB Once the member had may be paid the bonus for that specialty. "B" SRB entitlement for the the time the petitioner attended the training. The petitioner request to adjust the zone "C" SRB d. "B" and receive the higher SRB entitlement to reflect zone entitlement.