Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05650-01
Original file (05650-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

BOARD  FOR   CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

2 NAVY ANNE

X

WASHINGTON DC 20370.510

0

MEH:ddj
Docket No: 5650-01
30 October 2001

This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title  

IJnited States Code, section  

IO of the  

1552.

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
session, considered your application on 30 October 2001.
were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the
proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your
application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
opinion furnished by NPC memorandum  
attached.

In addition, the Board considered the advisory

1 of 2 October 2001, a copy of which is

I 160 Pers 81  

Your allegations of error and injustice

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice.  In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in
the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and votes of
the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are
You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this regard, it is important
to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records. Consequently,
when applying for a correction of an  
ofticial naval record, the burden is on the applicant to
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or

  such  that favorable action cannot be taken.
  upon submission of new and material

itl_justice.

 

Sincerely,

W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director

Enclosure

DEPARTMENT  OF THE NAVY

NAVY 
S720 

PIRSOWWIL  COMMAND
INTLDRITY  DRIVE

YlLLlnDtOr 

TN 

28015-0000

MEMORANDUM FOR CHAIRMAN,

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

Via:

PERS-OOZCB

Subj:

Ref:

N ICO

SNM's DD Form 149 dtd   18 Jul 01

(a) 
(b) MILPERSMAN   1160-100
(c)  MILPERSMAN 
1510-02 0

Encl:

(1) BCNR File

In response to reference (a),

1.
petitioner's request.

recommend disapproval of the

a.

The petitioner reenlisted on 29 October 1999 for six

resceived a zone "A" SRB entitlement for the STG(0000)

years and 
rate.

b.

The petitioner requests to change the reenlistment
contract of 29 October 1999 to reflect benefits of the STAP
program and receive automatic advancement to Petty Officer Second
Class.

C .

Per reference (b),

a Petty Officer Third Class that has
"C" school package that is
completed Class "C" school or Class
listed in the Current Career Schools List (CSL) may be advanced
to Petty Officer Second Class.

d.

Reference (c) did not list schools on the CSL for the STG

rate at the time the petitioner reenlisted.
petitioner is not eligible for STAR program benefits.

Therefore, the

3
L.

In view of the above,

recommend the petitioner's record

remain as is.

This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use by

3.
the Board for Correction of Naval Records
(1) is returned.

(BCNR) only.

Enclosure



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03457-01

    Original file (03457-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 July 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05470-01

    Original file (05470-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by NPC memorandum which is attached. recommend the petitioner's record This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use by 3 .

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01109-01

    Original file (01109-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 30 May 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The petitioner requests to receive his,automatic advancement to Petty Officer Second Class effective the reenlistment as part of the STAR program benefit.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05176-01

    Original file (05176-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 30 October 200 were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. reference (a), recommend...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1998 | NC9808650

    Original file (NC9808650.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    - Petitioner requests to receive the Petty Officer Second eligibility back by reason of the STAR program. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07709-02

    Original file (07709-02.PDF) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 June 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In this regard, it is important Consequently, Sincerely, W. DEAN PFEIFFER Executive Director Enclosure DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY NAVY PERSONNEL...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02263-01

    Original file (02263-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 August 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Recommend the petitioner's advancement to Petty recommend the petitioner's record This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use by 3. the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05735-01

    Original file (05735-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 30 October 2001. were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. recommend the petitioner's...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04573-01

    Original file (04573-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. recommend the petitioner's record This is an...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06172-02

    Original file (06172-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAV BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD Y S 2 NAVY ANNE X WASHINGTON DC 20370.510 0 MEH: ddj Docket No: 6172-02 13 November 2002 This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552. A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 November 2002. petitioner's request.