DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD
S
2 NAVY ANNE
X
WASHINGTON DC 20370-510
0 TRG
Docket No:
27 September 2001
3756-01
From:
To:
Subj:
Ref:
Encl:
Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
Secretary of the Navy
(a) Title 10 U.S.C. 1552
(1) DD Form 149 w/attachments
(2) Case Summary
(3) Subject's naval record
..-
1.
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, an
enlisted member of the United States Marine Corps Reserve filed
enclosure (1) with this Board requesting that his record be
corrected to show that he has no break in service.
The Board, consisting of Mr. Harrison,
2.
Mr. Rothlein and Mr.
Geisler, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice
on 25 September 2001 and,
pursuant to its regulations, determined
that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the
available evidence of record.
the Board consisted of the enclosures, naval records, and
applicable statutes,
Documentary material considered by
regulations and policies.
The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record pertaining
3.
to Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice, finds as
follows:
a.
Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all
administrative remedies available under existing law and
regulations within the Department of the Navy.
b.
Enclosure (1) was filed in a timely manner.
C .
Petitioner initially enlisted in the Marine Corps
Reserve on 17 June 1991 and incurred an eight year military
obligation from that date.
Marine Corps on 2 June 1992 for four years.
active duty on 1 June 1996 with his service characterized as
honorable.
He then enlisted in the Regular
He was released from
d.
The DD Form 214 issued on Petitioner's release from
active duty erroneously shows a termination date of his reserve
obligation as 1 June 2000,
enlistment in the Regular Marine Corps.
be eight years from his initial enlistment in the Marine Corps
which is eight years from his
As indicated, it should
Reserve on 17 June 1991.
e.
Acting on the erroneous date for the end of his military
obligation, Petitioner continued to drill after 16 June 1999. On
17 June 2000 and 17 November 2000 he extended the enlistment,
which had expired a year previously,
for periods totaling 17
months.
was credited with 77 and 75 retirement points in the anniversary
years ending 16 June 2000 and 16 June 2001, even though he had no
military status after 16 June 1999.
The Career Retirement Credit Report (CRCR) shows that he
._-
CONCLUSION:
Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record the
Board concludes that Petitioner's request warrants favorable
action.
Since an error has occurred, the Board concludes that
the record should be corrected to show that Petitioner was not
discharged on 16 June 1999,
effective 17 June 1999, for a period of 12 months.
subsequent extensions should be renumbered accordingly.
but extended his enlistment,
The two
The Board further concludes that this Report of Proceedings
should be filed in Petitioner's naval record so that all future
reviewers will understand that there is no break in service.
RECOMMENDATION:
That Petitioner's naval record be corrected to show that
Ee was not discharged on 16 June 1999
extension of his enlistment which
1999.
The two subsequent extensions should be renumbered.
but executed a 12 month
bec;me effective on 17 June
That this Report of Proceedings be filed in Petitioner's
b.
naval record.
It is certified that a quorum was present at the Board's
4.
and that the foregoing is a true and
review and deliberations,
complete record of the Board's proceedings in the above entitled
matter.
ROBERT D. ZSALMAN
Recorder
.
Acting Recorder
Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section
5.
6(e) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of
Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6(e))
and having assured compliance with its provisions, it is hereby
2
announced that the foregoing corrective action, taken under the
authority of reference NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04356-00
At enclosure (l), an advisory opinion from the Reserve Affairs Division, Career Management Team (CMT), HQMC, states that at no time did Petitioner request an additional extension to remain in the Marine Corps Reserve until the date gap surrounding the missing fitness report was resolved. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected by showing he reenlisted in the Marine Corps Reserve for three years on 15 April 2000 vice the two-year reenlistment on 12 April 2001 now of record. That he be...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04448-02
He states e. Attached to enclosure (1) is an advisory opinion from Headquarters Marine Corps which states that a nonmandatory participant cannot be retained in the Selected Marine Corps Reserve solely for the purpose of administrative discharge processing if the member requests a transfer to the IRR. In cases Therefore, Petitioner's record should be corrected to show that he was not discharged on 20 March 2000 but transferred to the IRR and continued to serve in the grade of SGT until he...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06100-01
considered your application on After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. That form shows The statement of service also shows that you continued to serve in the Air Force Reserve until you enlisted in the Marine Corps on 22 April 1996. Although an Air Force separation document states that your military obligation termination date was 30...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 08757-11
Pursuant to the provisions of reference {a}, Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Navy Reserve, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that his record be corrected to show that he was not discharged on 2 Aprii 1999, but continued to serve in the Individual Ready Reserve (IRR) until 1 April 2001. However, on 13 July 2000, he was informed by Naval Reserve Personnel Center that he was discharged on 2 April 1999 vice released from active duty and a correction to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02098-00
Your request to enter a “CD” (change of duty) fitness report for 9 March to 10 April 1991, reflecting service in combat with the primary duty of adjutant, could not be considered, as you did not provide such a report. the Reporting Senior's actions in 3c is in no way an invalidating factor in Reference (b) did not contain a very filling out Item 3c and Subj: MARINE CORPS PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REVIEW BOARD (PERB) ADVISORY OPINION ON BCNR APPLICATION IN THE CASE OF...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04663-01
Sincerely, W. DEAN PFEIFFER Executive Director Enclosures DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 TRG Docket No: 4663-01 2 April 2003 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD 0 ~mIuu-.m”~ Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. In response to congressional interest in Petitioner’s case, Headquarters Marine Corps stated, in part, as follows: ... On September 22, 1999, (Petitioner)...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05851-01
This would require the transfer of 17 retirement points into the anniversary year with 33 retirement points and continuation for an maximum of four years so he can earn the last six or eight years, whichever is required, in the reserve component. Therefore, given his many years of excellent service and the other circumstances of the case, the Board concludes that the record should be corrected to allow him to earn reserve retirement by completing eight years of qualifying service to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07036-99
was not done in Petitioner's case and he had no status in the Marine Corps reserve after 7 April Through administrative error this According to Petitioner 1997. the message from Headquarters Marine Corps (HQMC) authorizing separation pay stated that he should not be authorized a reserve It is unclear from the record why this was done, but contract. If given such status the comments concerning his However, the advisory opinion does not Given his overall good record and the other the Board...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04938-01
1552 (1) Case Summary (2) Subject's naval record From: To: Subj: Ref: Encl: Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a 1. former enlisted member of the United States Marine Corps Reserve filed an application with this Board requesting that his record be corrected to show that he transferred to the Retired Reserve vice being discharged on 21 January 1999. About this time, he transferred to the On 22 October 1998 a three month On 17 d. On 17 May 2001 Headquarters Marine Corps...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07791-00
He obtained the fitness report on 5 November 2000. states he was honorably discharged at the expiration of enlistment, as extended, on 6 November 2000. If The Board further concludes that this Report of Proceedings should be filed in Petitioner's naval record so that all future reviewers will understand the circumstances which led to his further service and crediting of drills. RECOMMENDATION: That Petitioner's naval record be corrected to show that a. he was not discharged became...