Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 08757-11
Original file (08757-11.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100

 

REC
Docket No: 08757-11
18 August 2011

From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
To: Secretary of the Navy

   
 

Subj: ,

Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C. 1552

Encl: (1) DD Form 149 with attachments
(2) Case Summary
(3) Subject's naval record

1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference {a}, Petitioner, a
former enlisted member of the Navy Reserve, filed enclosure (1)
with this Board requesting, in effect, that his record be
corrected to show that he was not discharged on 2 Aprii 1999, but

continued to serve in the Individual Ready Reserve (IRR) until 1
April 2001.

2. The Board, consisting of Mr. Bourgeois, Mr. Dixit, and Mr.
Ivins, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice
on 17 August 2011 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined
that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the
available evidence of record. Documentary material considered by
the Board consisted of the enclosures, naval records, and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.

3. The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record pertaining
to Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice finds as
follows:

a. Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted ail
administrative remedies available under existing Law and
regulations within the Department of the Navy.

b. Enclosure {1) was not filed in a timely manner.

c. Petitioner enlisted in the Navy Reserve on 27 March 1999,
and served honorably until an administrative error occurred. On
13 July 2000, the Petitioner signed a two year extension which
was never activated. On 2 April 1999, he was released from
active duty. However, on 13 July 2000, he was informed by Naval
Reserve Personnel Center that he was discharged on 2 April 1999
vice released from active duty and a correction to his
Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty (DD Form
214) was issued. He should have been transferred to the IRR and
have been allowed to serve until 1 April 2001.

CONCLUSION:

Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, the
Board concludes that Petitioner's request warrants relief. He
was in good standing in the Navy Reserve and but for an
administrative error, should not have been discharged on 2 April
1999. Therefore, the Board concludes that his record should show
that he was not discharged on 2 April 1999, but was transferred
to the IRR and allowed to serve until 1 April 2001.

RECOMMENDATION :

a. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected to show that
he was not discharged on 2 April 1999, but remained in the IRR in
pay grade E-6 until his Reserve Obligated Termination date of 1
April 2001.

b. That his record be further corrected by awarding him 50
non-pay drill points for his anniversary years ending on 1 April
2000 and 1 April 2001.

c. That his record show no break in service.

d. That a copy of this Report of Proceedings be filed in his
naval record.

4. Pursuant to Section 6{c) of the revised Procedures of the
Board for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal
Regulations, Section 723.6(c) it is certified that a quorum was
present at the Board's review and deliberations, and that the
foregoing is a true and complete record of the Board’s
proceedings in the above entitled matter.

N GEORGE

ROBERT D. ZSALMAN BRIAN
Recorder , Acting Recorder
5. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section
é(e) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of
Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulation, Section 723.6 (e))
and having assured compliance with its provisions, it is hereby
announced that the foregoing corrective action, taken under the

authority of reference (a), has been approved by the Board on
behalf of the Secretary of the Navy.

WwW. DEAN DPE F
Dire

Executive

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04448-02

    Original file (04448-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    He states e. Attached to enclosure (1) is an advisory opinion from Headquarters Marine Corps which states that a nonmandatory participant cannot be retained in the Selected Marine Corps Reserve solely for the purpose of administrative discharge processing if the member requests a transfer to the IRR. In cases Therefore, Petitioner's record should be corrected to show that he was not discharged on 20 March 2000 but transferred to the IRR and continued to serve in the grade of SGT until he...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 01904-03

    Original file (01904-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member in the Naval Reserve, filed an application with this Board requesting that his record be corrected to show a better reenlistment code than the RE-4 reenlistment code assigned on 18 January 2001. The Board, consisting of Ms.-Ms.-dand Mr. -, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 15 July 2003 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 10069-08

    Original file (10069-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX TRG WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 Docket No: 10069-08 19 February 2009 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD OF «gigi Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. At the end of his anniversary year on 18 April 2001 he was only credited with 42 of the 50 retirement points necessary for another qualifying year. Although Petitioner requested that the transfer to the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02285-01

    Original file (02285-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 TRG Docket No: 5 April 2001 2285-01 Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records Secretary of the Navy (a) Title 10 U.S.C. 1552 (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments (2) Case Summar (3) Subject's naval record y From: To: Subj: Ref: Encl: Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a 1. former enlisted member of the United States Marine Corps Reserve filed enclosure (1) with this Board...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 09968-02

    Original file (09968-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Petitioner completed 20 years of qualifying service for reserve retirement at the end of his anniversary year on 21 April 1995. RECOMMENDATION: That Petitioner's naval record be corrected by transferring a. sufficient retirement points from the excess over 50 in qualifying years to make the anniversary years ending 21 April 2002 and 21 April 2002 qualifying for reserve retirement. 6(e) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations,...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00123-00

    Original file (00123-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former commissioned officer in the United States Naval Reserve filed an application with this Board requesting that his record be corrected to show that he transferred to the Retired Reserve vice being discharged on 8 April and then to the Retired List, 2000. After a review of the chronology of service prepared Petitioner, Pers 9 noted that he earned 32 retirement points the anniversary year ending 9 September 1975 and, in...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08322-01

    Original file (08322-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    1552 (1) Case Summary (2) Subject's naval record From: To: Subj: Ref: Encl: Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a 1. former enlisted member of the Naval Reserve, filed an application with this Bpard requesting that her record be corrected to show that she was not discharged on 1 October 2000 but continued to serve in the She is also requesting credit for paid-drills from February 2001. It CONCLUSION: The fact that the doctor found her physically The Board believes that...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07312-01

    Original file (07312-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    1552 (1) Case Summary (2) Subject's naval record From: To: Subj: Ref: Encl: Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a 1. former enlisted member of the Marine Corps Reserve filed an application with this Board requesting, in effect, that his record be corrected to show that he was not discharged on 22 April 2001 but continued to serve until his reenlistment could be processed. Attached to enclosure (1) is a letter, dated 29 August 2001, from the Marine Corps Reserve Support...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04582-00

    Original file (04582-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    In spite of the fact that (Petitioner) was reporting for drill on the first weekend, the muster sheets for the first weekend were never annotated to show his reporting. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected to show that he 3 was not discharged on 7 November 1999 but continued to be a member of the Marine Corps Reserve; That Petitioner be further corrected to show that he was b. credited with four pay drills in December 1997 and February and June 1999 and in any other months in 1999...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04938-01

    Original file (04938-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    1552 (1) Case Summary (2) Subject's naval record From: To: Subj: Ref: Encl: Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a 1. former enlisted member of the United States Marine Corps Reserve filed an application with this Board requesting that his record be corrected to show that he transferred to the Retired Reserve vice being discharged on 21 January 1999. About this time, he transferred to the On 22 October 1998 a three month On 17 d. On 17 May 2001 Headquarters Marine Corps...