Y
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAV
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAW ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100
JLP:ddj
Docket No: 3291-98
13 April 1999
This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
session, considered your application on 13 April 1999. Your allegations of error and injustice
were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the
proceedings of this Board. Documentarymaterial considered by the Board consisted of your
application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory
opinion furnished by
of which is attached.
BUMED memorandum 7220 SER 527
/97-4080 of 8 March 1999, a copy
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in
the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and votes of
the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this regard, it is important
to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records. Consequently,
when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
Enclosure
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BUREAU OF MEDICINE AND SURGERY
2300
E STREET NW
WASHINGTON
DC 20372-5300
722 0
Ser
8 Mar 99
527/97-4080
Bureau of Medicine and Surgery
Chief,
Board for Correction of Naval Records
ADVISORY OPINIONS ICO
SECNAVINST'7220.75C
(a)
(b) NAVADMIN
198/95
From:
To:
Subj:
Ref:
Encl:
(1) BCNR File ICO
1.
Enclosure (1) is returned recommending disapproval.
IA%' guidance of references (a) and (b),
2.
authorized Medical Incentive Special Pay (ISP)
effective 15 January 1998 due to a four year Multi-year Special
Pay (MSP) contract initiated in fiscal year 1996. On
15 January 1998,
Although the error was through no fault of the member, he is not
entitled to keep the overpayment.
he was inadvertently overpaid by $2,000.
.of
$6,~0,0.00
is
3.
Point of contact is Hospital Corpsman First Class
who may be reached at 202-762-3363,
DSN 762-3367, or
367,
navy,
By direction
copy to:
DFAS (FMA-562)
PERS-4415N
Naval Medical Clinic, Annapolis
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 00981-98
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 05592-98
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by 527/99-4076 of 22 February 1999, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 05100-03
In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by BUMED letter 7220 Ser 132103-3701 dated 14 August 2003, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. Sincerely, Executive Direc 7 Enclosure DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BUREAU OF MEDICINE AND SURGERY 2300 E STREET NW WASHINGTON DC 20372-5300 7220 - Ser 132/03-3701 14 Aug...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 03742-06
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by BUt4ED letter 7220 Ser Ml/O5UMl-50l8 of 10 January 2006, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 00877-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 July 2008. your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in Support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05172-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 March 2002. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by the Chief, Bureau of Medicine and Surgery dated 10 August 2001, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02566-02
Your previous case, docket number You again requested entry grade credit for 1, seeking reconsideration of A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, reconsidered your case on 26 November 2002. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by the Chief, Bureau of Medicine and Surgery dated 12 September 2002, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04235-01
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. Sincerely, W. DEAN PFEIFFER Executive Director Enclosure MEMORANDUM From: To: Subj: Ref: 26 Jul 01 Medical Service Corps, BCNR Coordinator (Pers-OOZCB) Officer Community Manager (N131M3) ADVISORY OPINION OF RECONSIDERATION ICO EN SE , USNR (a) BCNR Coord request received 09 Jul 2001 (b) MSC OCM (c) SECNAVINST (N131M3)...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 00787-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 23 May 2002. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by the Chief, Bureau of Medicine and Surgery dated 8 April 2002, a copy of which is attached, and your letters dated 26 February and 17 May 2002, each with enclosure. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 06812-98
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. the following recommendation concerning The petitioner is requesting information on the 26 days 2 .