DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
B O A R D F O R C O R R E C T I O N O F N A V A L R E C O R D S
2 N A V Y A N N E X
W A S H I N G T O N D C 2 0 3 7 0 - 5 1 0 0
HD: hd
Docket No: 05 172-0 1
8 March 2002
This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552. You requested three years of
entry grade credit for your degree in law.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
session, considered your application on 7 March 2002. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures
applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board
consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your
naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board
considered the advisory opinion furnished by the Chief, Bureau of Medicine and Surgery
dated 10 August 2001, a copy of which is attached.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained
in the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and
votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be
taken. You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and
material evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this regard, it is
important to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the
applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
Enclosure
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BUREAU OF MEDICINE AND SURGERY
2300 E STREET NW
WASHINGTON DC 20372-5300
IN REPLY REFER TO
1120
Ser 522/01-7846
10 Aug 01
From: Chief, Bureau of Medicine and Surgery
To:
Board for Correction of Naval Records
Subj : ADVISORY OPINIONS ICO CDR -MC,
USN, s
Ref:
(a) SECNAVINST 1120.12A
Encl: (1) BCNR Application ICO CD
1. Enclosure (1) is forwarded with the advisory opinion that
Commander.-
as listed at 13 May 1989.
Date of Rank (DOR) for Lieutenant is correct
2. Per reference (a), "credit for advanced education may be
awarded for master's or doctorate degrees in the following fields
when the degree contributes directly to the performance in the
primary medical or surgical specialty to which the applicant will
be assigned"; a doctorate in Juris Prudence is not listed. In
addition, the degree did not contribute to the medical specialty
to which he was initially assigned, i.e. General Medical Officer.
3. Your point of co
who may be reached a
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 06385-01
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to reflect entry grade credit for her dietetic internship. That Petitioner ’s naval record be corrected, where appropriate, to show the date of rank on her commission as an ensign, Medical Service Corps, U. S. Naval Reserve as 7 April 1999, vice 7 January 2000; and that her lineal precedence be...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 00787-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 23 May 2002. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by the Chief, Bureau of Medicine and Surgery dated 8 April 2002, a copy of which is attached, and your letters dated 26 February and 17 May 2002, each with enclosure. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 00294-03
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by adjusting the date of rank on his commission as a lieutenant, Dental Corps, U. S. Naval Reserve to reflect credit for his prior service as an 0-3 (captain) in the U. S. Army. ~iyector, Active and Reserve Officer Career Progression Division DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BUREAU OF MEDICINE AND...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04235-01
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. Sincerely, W. DEAN PFEIFFER Executive Director Enclosure MEMORANDUM From: To: Subj: Ref: 26 Jul 01 Medical Service Corps, BCNR Coordinator (Pers-OOZCB) Officer Community Manager (N131M3) ADVISORY OPINION OF RECONSIDERATION ICO EN SE , USNR (a) BCNR Coord request received 09 Jul 2001 (b) MSC OCM (c) SECNAVINST (N131M3)...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02907-02
Pursuant to the provisi filed enclosure (1) with thi corrected to show he was 4 commissioned as a lieutena d&e of rank is 2 lieutenant ns of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be anted two additional years of entry grade credit when he was t in the Medical Corps, U. S. Naval Reserve. Surgery, office with as enclosure (2), the Chief, Bureau of Medicine and ce over the subject matter of this case has...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07690-01
You requested that your lieutenant date of rank and effective date be changed from 1 October 2001 to 1 April 2001 A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 June 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 05100-03
In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by BUMED letter 7220 Ser 132103-3701 dated 14 August 2003, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. Sincerely, Executive Direc 7 Enclosure DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BUREAU OF MEDICINE AND SURGERY 2300 E STREET NW WASHINGTON DC 20372-5300 7220 - Ser 132/03-3701 14 Aug...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 07416-05
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 May 2006. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinions furnished by the Bureau of Medicine and Surgery dated 7 October 2005 and the Navy Personnel Command dated 14 November 2005 with enclosure, copies of which are attached. Reference (a) request comments and recommendations in subject member’s case.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03242-01
consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In this regard, and it is Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. master program E in healt h ’s (c) t Each reference clearly states a qualifyin a concentration in health care selected did not include a...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06411-02
As you may kn fitness for military duty cases where the service presumption of fitness, disorder were considered insufficient to warrant any corrective ove, you have not demonstrated that you were unfit for duty, isability separation or retirement of a service member. The Veterans Administration and the Gulf War Health rked up these multiple medical problems without definitely defining was found “fit” for retirement, his case was not referred to the PEB r not he was eligible for medical...