Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 00981-98
Original file (00981-98.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
1

9

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAV
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

Y

2 NAW ANNEX

WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100

JLP: ddj
Docket No: 981-98
30 March 1999

This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
session, considered your application on 30 March 1999. Your allegations of error and injustice
were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the
proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your
application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
opinion furnished by 
copy of which is attached.

In addition, the Board considered the advisory
527/99-4074 of 22 February 1999, a

BUMED memorandum 7220 SER 

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in
the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and votes of
the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this regard, it is important
to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records. Consequently,
when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

Sincerely,

W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director

Enclosure

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BUREAU OF MEDICINE AND SURGERY

2300 

E STREET NW

WASHINGTON 

DC 

20372-5300

IN 

REPLY  REFER TO

722 0
Ser 
22  Feb 99

527/99-4074

From:
To:

Subj:

Ref:

Chief, Bureau of Medicine and Surgery
Board for Correction of Naval Records

ADVISORY OPINIONS ICO

(a) SECNAVINST 
(b) NAVADMIN  

7220.75C
230/97  of 

25'Sep 97

Encl:

(1) BCNR File ICO

1.

Enclosure (1) is returned recommending disapproval.

IAW guidance of references (a) and (b), eligibility dates for
2.
Medical Incentive Special Pay (ISP) is not earlier than 1 October

ompletion of initial residency.
ompleted his residency 4 August

1997 therefore, his current ISP date of 1 October 1997 is
correct.

3.

Point of contact is Hospital Corpsman First Class

N, who may be reached at 202-762-3363,
2-762-3367, DSN 762-3367, or
us.med.navy.m

,..

By direction

copy to:
DFAS (FMA-562).
PERS-4415N
Naval Hospital, Jacksonville



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 05592-98

    Original file (05592-98.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by 527/99-4076 of 22 February 1999, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 03291-98

    Original file (03291-98.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentarymaterial considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 03742-06

    Original file (03742-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by BUt4ED letter 7220 Ser Ml/O5UMl-50l8 of 10 January 2006, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 05100-03

    Original file (05100-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by BUMED letter 7220 Ser 132103-3701 dated 14 August 2003, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. Sincerely, Executive Direc 7 Enclosure DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BUREAU OF MEDICINE AND SURGERY 2300 E STREET NW WASHINGTON DC 20372-5300 7220 - Ser 132/03-3701 14 Aug...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 00877-08

    Original file (00877-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 July 2008. your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in Support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR2857-13

    Original file (NR2857-13.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to retroactive Board Certified Pay (BCP) in the amount of $30,000, | and Additional Special Pay in the amount of $60,000 from 1996 to 2003. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Zsalman and Exnicios reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 11 October 2013 and, pursuant to its...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR9315 13

    Original file (NR9315 13.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 §. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed ‘enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to retroactive Incentive Special Pay (ISP) and Medical Additional Special Pay (ASP) from ey -: 2. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Zsalman, George and Ruskin reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 10 March 2014 and,...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 06851-98

    Original file (06851-98.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show entitlement to Medical Incentive Special Pay (ISP) for 1995 and 1996. (2), the Board finds the existence of an injustice warranting the Y DEPARTMENT OF THE NAV BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 Docket No: 6851-98 MMENDATION: That Petitioner ’s...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 07416-05

    Original file (07416-05.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 May 2006. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinions furnished by the Bureau of Medicine and Surgery dated 7 October 2005 and the Navy Personnel Command dated 14 November 2005 with enclosure, copies of which are attached. Reference (a) request comments and recommendations in subject member’s case.

  • AF | BCMR | CY1999 | 9801723

    Original file (9801723.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    Although the applicant met the requirements for practice as a plastic surgeon in the civilian community, he failed to meet the Air Force requirements for plastic surgery certification (i.e., five-years general surgery residency and additional three-year plastic surgery fellowship). Applicant's complete response is attached at Exhibit E. _________________________________________________________________ ADDITIONAL AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The Superintendent, Medical Special Pay Branch,...