Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04235-01
Original file (04235-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD
X

2 NAVY ANNE

S

WASHINGTON DC 20370-510

0

HD: hd
Docket No: 0423501
14 November 2001

This is in reference to your letter dated 23 May 2001, seeking reconsideration of your
previous 
a$l$ication for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10
of the United States Code, section 1552. Your previous case, docket number 04101-00, was
denied on 19 April 200 1.

Your allegations of error and injustice

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
session, reconsidered your case on 8 November 2001.
were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the
proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your
letter, together with all material submitted in support thereof, the Board
’s file on your prior
case, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the
Board considered the advisory opinions furnished by the Medical Service Corps Officer
Community Manager, dated 26 July 2001, and the Chief, Bureau of Medicine and Surgery
dated 27 August 2001 with enclosure, copies of which are attached. The Board also
considered your letter dated 8 October 200 1.

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained
in the advisory opinions. Accordingly, the Board again voted to deny relief. The names and
votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be
taken. You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new
and material evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this
regard, it is important to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official

records. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the
burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or
injustice.

Sincerely,

W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director

Enclosure

MEMORANDUM

From:
To:

Subj:

Ref:

26 Jul 01

Medical Service Corps,
BCNR Coordinator (Pers-OOZCB)

Officer Community Manager  

(N131M3)

ADVISORY OPINION OF RECONSIDERATION ICO EN
SE

, USNR

(a) BCNR Coord request received 09 Jul 2001
(b) MSC OCM  
(c) SECNAVINST 

(N131M3) memo of   26 Sep 00

1120.8B

In response to reference (a), do not concur with the

1.
reconsideration of entry grade credit (EGC) requested by ENS

f 23 May 2001.

The review determined that

As stated in reference (b),

2.
and in accordance with reference
(c), a review of educational background for EGC consideration was
conducted.
id not
possess the educational background or
necessary for entry at the grade of  
in reference (b), the Masters degree in Management and Human
Resources did not provide the minimum educational background
necessary to support the position requirements at the O-2 level.

specialty requirements

LTjg.

As previously stated

3.

I can be rea

or'

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BUREAU OF MEDICINE AND SURGERY

2300 E STREET NW

WASHINGTON DC

20372-5300
 

IN REPLY REFER TO

1120
Ser 
27 Aug 01

522/01-7851

From:
To:

Subj:

Ref:

Encl:

Chief, Bureau of Medicine and Surgery
Board for Correction of Naval Records

0

SC, USNR,

(a) SECNAVINST 
(b) Program Authorization 115 Revision May 1998
(c) NAVADMIN 

1120.8B

130/00

(1) BCNR Application ICO
(2) Summary document from

Corps Plans Officer,

B

f 23 May 01
dical Service

1.

Enclosure

(1) is forwarded recommending
date of rank for ensign remai

Enclosure (2) provide
2.
documentation that Ensign
correctly and equitably e

3.
may be 

Your poin
reache

n with supporting
entry grade credit was

.NC, USN, who

MEMORANDUM

From: Medical Service Corps Plans Officer
BCNR Coordinator (PERS-OOZCB)
To:

Refi (a)

BCNR Applicati
SECNAVINST 
PA 115 dtd June 98
BUPERSINST 113 1.2

1120.8B

(b)
(c)
(d)

quests entry grade credit (EGC) for his master’s degree in

Human Resources Management, reference (a). Entry grade credit should not be granted
for his master’s degree.

orrect in stating that prior to Fiscal Year (FY) 2060 individuals
nservice Procurement Program (IPP) with a masters in a

&id, including those without any health c&e emphasis, were given EGC
business related
to LTJG. However, starting with FY 2000 IPP selects, only those with masters in health
care or masters in business with an emphasis in health care were given EGC to LTJG.
This determination and subsequent actions by the Director, Medical Service Corps
represented a change in practice rather than policy as it was discovered the EGC given in
previous years was done so without closely following the established guidelines in
reference (b) through (d). Reference (b) provides guidance on awarding EGC. It states
constructive service credit will be awarded for advanced education, training, and
professional experience. It further states credit will be awarded for degrees in
management disciplines directly related to health care administration, as approved by the
Director, Medical Service Corps. Reference (c), the Program Authorization (PA) 115 for
MSC officers, signed by Assistant Chief of Naval Personnel for Military Personnel
r which degrees
Policy and Career Progression, has been utilize
application
qualify for EGC. The PA in effect at the time
required a master’s degree with a major in health care, hospital or health service
administration or a master’s in business administration with a concentration in health care

andard for awarding EGC commenced in FY 2000. At the time
s commissioned only those individuals who had completed a

masters in health care or an MBA/MPH with an emphasis in health care were granted
EGC to LTJG.

non-HCA master’s degrees were commissioned as ensigns in the same year.

ackage was processed using the same standard applied to all
r and subsequent years. Of note, five (5) other applicants with



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 00787-02

    Original file (00787-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 23 May 2002. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by the Chief, Bureau of Medicine and Surgery dated 8 April 2002, a copy of which is attached, and your letters dated 26 February and 17 May 2002, each with enclosure. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 06385-01

    Original file (06385-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to reflect entry grade credit for her dietetic internship. That Petitioner ’s naval record be corrected, where appropriate, to show the date of rank on her commission as an ensign, Medical Service Corps, U. S. Naval Reserve as 7 April 1999, vice 7 January 2000; and that her lineal precedence be...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 03430-05

    Original file (03430-05.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show entry grade credit (EGC) for time spent earning advanced degrees.2. DEAN PFEIFFERExecutive Director DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BUREAU OF MEDICINE AND SURGERY2300 E STREET NWWASHINGTON DC 20372-5300 IN REPLY REFER TO Ser M1/05UM1—791716 Jun 05From: Chief, Bureau of Medicine and...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03242-01

    Original file (03242-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In this regard, and it is Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. master program E in healt h ’s (c) t Each reference clearly states a qualifyin a concentration in health care selected did not include a...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 07416-05

    Original file (07416-05.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 May 2006. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinions furnished by the Bureau of Medicine and Surgery dated 7 October 2005 and the Navy Personnel Command dated 14 November 2005 with enclosure, copies of which are attached. Reference (a) request comments and recommendations in subject member’s case.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR9148 13

    Original file (NR9148 13.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show his promotion to lieutenant junior grade (pay grade O-2) with a date of rank and effective date of 6 June 2007 (the day after his disenrollment from the Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences (USUHS)), and promotion to lieutenant (pay grade O-3) with a date of rank and...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02566-02

    Original file (02566-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Your previous case, docket number You again requested entry grade credit for 1, seeking reconsideration of A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, reconsidered your case on 26 November 2002. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by the Chief, Bureau of Medicine and Surgery dated 12 September 2002, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 07778-07

    Original file (07778-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    In correspondence attached as enclosure (2), the Chief, Bureau of Medicine and Surgery commented to the effect that Petitioner is entitled to additional EGC for the period in question, such that the date of rank on his Commission as a lieutenant, Medical Corps, should be changed from 7 June 2007 to 4 May 2006.c. They stated this would allow them to grant Petitioner active duty credit for the period 25 May 2001 to 31 July 2003.CONCLUSION:Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01939-01

    Original file (01939-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by the Nurse Corps Community Manager dated 9 May 2001, a copy of which is attached. All sources of information applicable at the time th accepted commissioning were congruent in the use of the including BUPERSINST 1131.3, SECNAVINST 'appointment', 10 which continue to use the term 'appointment' to mean permanent appointment. The enlisted service obligation terminates at the 11(c) of BUPERSINST paragraph Il.(g).

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR6952 13

    Original file (NR6952 13.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S, COURTHOUSE RD SUITE 100% ARLINGTON VA 22204-2490 BAN Docket No:NRO6952-13 1 May 2024 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records TO: Secretary of the Navy Sub): Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner's received an Entry Date Credit of two years...