Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 05592-98
Original file (05592-98.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

2 NAVY ANNEX

WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100

JLP: ddj
Docket No: 5592-98
30 March 1999

This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
session, considered your application on 30 March 1999. Your allegations of error and injustice
were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the
proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your
application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory
opinion furnished by 
527/99-4076 of 22 February 1999, a
copy of which is attached.

BUMED memorandum 7220 SER 

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in
the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and votes of
the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard, it is important
to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records. Consequently,
when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

Sincerely,

W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director

Enclosure

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BUREAU OF MEDICINE AND SURGERY

2300 

E STREET NW

WASHINGTON DC 

20372-5300

IN REPLY REFER

 

TO

722 0
Ser 
22  Feb 99

527/99-4076

From:
To:

Chief, Bureau of Medicine and Surgery
Board for Correction of Naval Records

Subj:

ADVISORY OPINIONS ICO

Ref:

(a) SECNAVINST 

7220.75C

a

Encl:

( 1 )  BCNR File ICO LCDR Randall

1 .

Enclosure (1) is returned recommending disapproval.

IAW guidance of reference (a),

2.
Incentive Special Pay (ISP) is not earlier than 1 October of the

eligibility dates for Medical

ion of initial residency.
completed his residency 19 August
his ISP dates of 1 October 1995, 1 October 1996

1995 therefore,
and 1 October 1997 are correct.

3.

Point of contact is Hospital Corpsman First Class

USN, who may be reached at 202-762-3363,

DSN 762-3367, or

copy to:
DFAS (FMA-562)
PERS-4415N
Naval 

,Hospital,  Camp Lejeune



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 00981-98

    Original file (00981-98.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 03291-98

    Original file (03291-98.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentarymaterial considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 03742-06

    Original file (03742-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by BUt4ED letter 7220 Ser Ml/O5UMl-50l8 of 10 January 2006, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 05100-03

    Original file (05100-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by BUMED letter 7220 Ser 132103-3701 dated 14 August 2003, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. Sincerely, Executive Direc 7 Enclosure DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BUREAU OF MEDICINE AND SURGERY 2300 E STREET NW WASHINGTON DC 20372-5300 7220 - Ser 132/03-3701 14 Aug...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 00877-08

    Original file (00877-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 July 2008. your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in Support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 06851-98

    Original file (06851-98.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show entitlement to Medical Incentive Special Pay (ISP) for 1995 and 1996. (2), the Board finds the existence of an injustice warranting the Y DEPARTMENT OF THE NAV BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 Docket No: 6851-98 MMENDATION: That Petitioner ’s...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 07416-05

    Original file (07416-05.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 May 2006. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinions furnished by the Bureau of Medicine and Surgery dated 7 October 2005 and the Navy Personnel Command dated 14 November 2005 with enclosure, copies of which are attached. Reference (a) request comments and recommendations in subject member’s case.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 00787-02

    Original file (00787-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 23 May 2002. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by the Chief, Bureau of Medicine and Surgery dated 8 April 2002, a copy of which is attached, and your letters dated 26 February and 17 May 2002, each with enclosure. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02566-02

    Original file (02566-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Your previous case, docket number You again requested entry grade credit for 1, seeking reconsideration of A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, reconsidered your case on 26 November 2002. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by the Chief, Bureau of Medicine and Surgery dated 12 September 2002, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR2857-13

    Original file (NR2857-13.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to retroactive Board Certified Pay (BCP) in the amount of $30,000, | and Additional Special Pay in the amount of $60,000 from 1996 to 2003. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Zsalman and Exnicios reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 11 October 2013 and, pursuant to its...