DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 203704100
JSN
HD: hd
Docket No: 0119598
24 May 1999
Dear Chief Warrant
This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
session, considered your application on 20 May 1999. Your allegations of error and injustice
were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the
proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your
application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
opinion furnished by the Bureau of Naval Personnel dated 23 March 1998, a copy of which is
attached.
In addition, the Board considered the advisory
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained
in the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and
votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be
taken. You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and
material evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard, it is
important to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the
applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
Enclosure
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BUREAU OF NAVAL PERSONNEL
WASHINGTON. D.C. 20370-5000
IN REPLY REFER TO
5420
Ser
,
26/055
,,
,._.,
.’
MEMORANDUM FOR BCNR
Via:
BUPERS/ BCNR Coordinator
Subj:
Encl: (1) BCNR File
1. Enclosure (1) is returned recommending disapproval of
to backdate her date of rank to 1 November 1994.
uest
2. The President approved the nomination of warrant officers recommended by the
FY95 Chief Warrant Officer (W3) Promotion Selection Board on 15 December 1994. By
statute, the earliest date of rank an officer can have is the date of Presidential approval.
two
te of rank for (W3) of 15 December 1994 is correct.
3. Recommend disapproval of her request to backdate her date of rank.
BCNR Liaison, Officer Promotions
and Enlisted Advancements Division
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 03514-98
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and In addition, the Board considered the advisory applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by the Bureau of naval Personnel dated 10 June 1998, a copy of which is attached. Promotion Selection Board.
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 01084-98
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 May 1999. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and In addition, the Board considered the advisory applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by the Bureau of Naval Personnel dated 20 April 1998, a copy of which is attached.
NAVY | BCNR | CY1998 | NC9807948
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 HD:hd Docket No: 07948-98 24 June 1999 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj; WH ene Be li REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. He specifically requested a date of rank and effective date of 1 December 1997. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Ensley, Goldsmith and Pfeiffer, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 10...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 06189-00
In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinions furnished by the Navy Personnel Command, dated 22 November 2000, 15 February and 11 June 2001, and the Medical Corps Officer Community Manager dated 26 April 2001, copies of which are attached.The Board also considered your counsel’s letters dated 17 April and 18 September 2001. evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. However, this evidence, by itself, did not establish...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 08436-98
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by NPC memorandum 5420 Ser attached. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01524-01
reques:ed removal of your failure of your naval record pursuant to the A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session? opinion furnished by the Navy Personnel Command dated 23 April attached. Enclosure (1) is returned, recommending disapproval of request to backdate his date of rank.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02778-00
You alleged that your spot promotion correspondence was mailed for consideration by the FY 00 First Quarter Spot Selection Board, convened on 5 November 1999. A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 April 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05507-01
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. evidence that the board acted contrary to law, the action of the board involved material error of fact or material administrative error, or the board did not have material information before it. This is the date of rank he would have in this matter is Chief Warrant Officer 2 DEPARTMENT OF...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08398-00
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Our records indicate that the member’s BCNR directed corrections were completed prior to the FY-98 board. A review of the member’s master officer file and the record of proceedings for the FY-98 Active Duty Lieutenant Commander Chaplain Corps Promotion Selection Board, convened on 5 May...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 09248-06
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 July 2007. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The petitioner was promoted to commander at the 16 year point and was within the flow point guidelines.