Y
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAV
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100
HD: hd
Docket No: 01084-98
24 May 1999
Dear Lieutenant
This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
session, considered your application on 20 May 1999. Your allegations of error and injustice
were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the
proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your
application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
In addition, the Board considered the advisory
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
opinion furnished by the Bureau of Naval Personnel dated 20 April 1998, a copy of which is
attached.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained
in the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and
votes’ of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be
taken.
.You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and
material evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this regard, it is
important to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the
applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
Enclosure
DEPARTMENT OF THE
BUREAU OF NAVAL PERSONNEL
WASHINGTON. D.C. 20370-5000
NAVI
IN REPLY REFER TO
5420
Ser
26/l 10
APR 20 1998
MEMORANDUM FOR BCNR
Via:
BUPERSBCNR Coordinator
Subj: L
Encl: (1) BCNR File
1. Enclosure (1) is return d recommending disapproval of
adjust his date of rank 1
ZZ$%%%Y 1997.
s request to
requests his date of rank for Lieutenant be adjusted to
7. At the t
ion Board,
97 Lieutenant Medical Service Corps
had not been on active duty for one year.
SECNAVINST
Unless an officer requests otherwise, per
considered in or above zone, eligible officers who have not been on
year prior to the board convening date are automatically deferred. I
set of orders, he was advised to contact the Officer Promotions Division concerning
promotion issues i.e., consideration by a promotion board. There is no information to
indicate that he took any action to determine available options regarding promotion
eligibility or waiving right of deferral.
1420.1A who would be
one
nitial
3. Recommend his request to backdate his date of rank be denied.
BCNR Liaison, Officer Promotions
and Enlisted Advancements Division
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 03514-98
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and In addition, the Board considered the advisory applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by the Bureau of naval Personnel dated 10 June 1998, a copy of which is attached. Promotion Selection Board.
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 08128-97
member's petition revealed the report to be a not observed because of the member's status as a student. The report contains the required comment in Subj: L , USN, d. Further review of the member's headquarters record revealed a report for the period of 1 July 1996 to 31 January 1997. front of the document is reflected. The report on file is incomplete as only the Since the member included a e. Review of Pers-322 selection board support files revealed an advanced message was sent to the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1998 | 05214-98
In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinions furnished by the Navy Personnel Command dated 12 and 16 April 1999, copies of which are attached. Until 1 September 1995, as a member of the Ready Reserve, and as such, W= be considered by promotion - - selection boards. A complete review of Lieutenant Commander record reveals that there were no properly considered during either failure of selection per reference (c).
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | Document scanned on Fri Feb 16 10_49_51 CST 2001
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show the lineal position, date of rank, and effective date in the grade of lieutenant he would have been assigned had he been promoted in due course. His current date of rank, 24 November 1999, is the date given to him as though he was selected by the FY-99 Active-Duty Lieutenant Line...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02778-00
You alleged that your spot promotion correspondence was mailed for consideration by the FY 00 First Quarter Spot Selection Board, convened on 5 November 1999. A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 April 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1998 | 07848-98
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show the lineal position, date of rank, and effective date in the grade of lieutenant commander he would have been assigned had he been confirmed in the expected time for an officer selected by the Fiscal Year 98 Lieutenant Commander Line Selection Board. The Board, consisting of Messrs....
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 09083-97
In light of the information contained in the advisory opinion dated 16 April 1998, that the fitness report in question was forwarded for file on 26 August 1954, the Board found this report was probably in your In view of the above, your application has record for at least the been denied. The second gap identified by BUPERS was for the period of 6 April 1949 to 30 June 1949 and on 29 March 1954 BUPERS requested a fitness report from the member's reporting senior. was Subj: CD USNR(RET) We...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 00172-99
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show the lineal position, date of rank, and effective date in the grade of lieutenant he would have been assigned had he been confirmed in the expected time for an officer selected by the Fiscal Year 99 Lieutenant Line Selection Board. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Ensley, Goldsmith and...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 04514-97
In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinions furnished by the Bureau of Naval Personnel dated 19 September and 3 November 1997 and 20 May 1998 with reference (b), copies of which are attached. We cannot determine if the promotion recommendation is in accordance PRT regulations in effect at the time since or if the member could have been recommendation for promotion as it appears the member may have been out of two fitness reports. DSN MSC, USNR, f contact is LCD Pers-601,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 01195-98
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 May 1999. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by the Bureau of Naval Personnel dated 23 March 1998, a copy of which is attached.