Y
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAV
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100
LCC: lc
Docket No: 8436-98
25 May 1999
RETIRED
This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
session, considered your application on 25 May 1999. Your allegations of error and injustice
were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the
proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your
application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
opinion furnished by NPC memorandum 5420 Ser
attached.
In addition, the Board considered the advisory
85/049 of 5 April 1999, a copy of which is
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in
the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and votes of
the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this regard, it is important
to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
Consequently,
Enclosure
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
.
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVY PERSONNEL COMMAND
5720 INTEGRITY DRIVE
MILLINDTON TN
38055-0000
5420
Ser
5 Apr 99
85/049
MEMORANDUM FOR BCNR
Via:
BUPERS/BCNR Coordinator
USN,
Encl:
(1) BCNR File
1.
Enclosure (1) is returned recommending disapproval of CW02
w was
request for advancement to CW03.
red and failed to select before the FY-98 and FY-99
CW02
Active Chief Warrant Officer
(W3) Promotion Selection Boards.
cwo2
2.
delay in his
presented with a fair portrayal of his career.
request is based upon his claim that due to
relnstatement to CW02, the Selection Boards were not
The FY-98 and FY-99 Boards had all the information that was
3.
required for consideration
including CW02
the boards,
absence of his fitness rep
sufficient information upon which to make promotion decisions and
determined him not best qualified for promotion.
ds that were presented before
correspondence explaining the
m his official record, provided
4.
Recommend disapproval
of his request.
icer Promotions and
Advancements Division
.
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 01889-99
In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by the Navy Personnel Command dated 27 May 1999, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. record reviewed before the FY99 CW03 Promotion Selection Board was complete.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04456-00
(MSC) Captain Selection Boards; special selection board Naval Reserve MSC Captain Selection Board, by which you You requested, in effect, removal of your failures of selection by the Fiscal Year (FY) 2001 through 2003 Medical Service consideration for the FY 2000 were not considered; and amendment of the remedial memorandum now in your naval record, stating you have served on active duty continuously since your discharge from the Regular Navy on 31 January 1990, to show you are “USN” (United...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08398-00
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Our records indicate that the member’s BCNR directed corrections were completed prior to the FY-98 board. A review of the member’s master officer file and the record of proceedings for the FY-98 Active Duty Lieutenant Commander Chaplain Corps Promotion Selection Board, convened on 5 May...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07125-00
The member alleges an administrative error was made on his fitness report in question concerning his promotion recommendation. c. The member and the reporting senior refer to changes to the fitness report in question as administrative changes. is returned concurr 5420 Pers 85 27 Mar 01 ings of NR The fitness report dated 14 Jul 98 2. have affected the FY-00 Active Duty Captain Line Promotion Selection Board, as it The FY-01 board would have been the first convened 14 Jan 99. to review the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03301-01
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD NAVY ANNEX 2 WASHINGTON DC 20370-510 0 S HD: hd Docket No: 03301-01 15 February 2002 Dear Command This is in reference to your application dated 20 April 2001 for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10, United States Code, section 1552, seeking removal of your failures of selection by the Fiscal Year (FY) 97 and 98 Lieutenant Commander Staff Selection Boards, and reinstatement to active duty as a...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1998 | NC9807421
d. In correspondence attached as enclosure (2), the Navy Personnel Command (NPC) office having cognizance over fitness report matters has commented that in view of the results of the DODIG investigation, they recommend that the fitness report in question be removed from Petitioner's record. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected by removing therefrom the following fitness report and related material: Period of Report Date of Report Reporting Senior From To 96Augi6 950ct31 96Aug16 b. ...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 08728-98
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that his naval record be corrected by removing his failure of selection for promotion before the Fiscal Year 99 Line Lieutenant Commander Selection Board, so as to be considered by the selection board next convened to consider officers of his category for promotion to lieutenant commander as an officer who has not failed of selection for...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08250-98
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show his date of rank in the grade of lieutenant as 19 August 1976 vice 20 May 1972. Counsel insisted that Petitioner’s lieutenant date of rank should be corrected as requested, to allow him to complete 30 years of service in fiscal year 2007. Accordingly, counsel requested, ’ in the event...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 06129-00
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 HD: hd Docket No: 06129-00 20 July 2001 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: LCDR REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD c, us Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01091-01
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. Recommend disapproval of XXXXXXX BCNR request.