Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 03514-98
Original file (03514-98.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

2 NAW ANNEX

WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100

HD: hd
Docket No: 03514-98
24 May 1999

This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.

of’Naval Records, sitting in executive

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction 
session, considered your application on 20 May 1999. Your allegations of error and injustice
were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the
proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your
application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
In addition, the Board considered the advisory
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
opinion furnished by the Bureau of naval Personnel dated 10 June 1998, a copy of which is
attached.

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained
in the advisory opinion. Further, the Board was unable to find you should have been
considered by an earlier lieutenant commander spot promotion selection board. In view of
the above, your application has been denied. The names and votes of the members of the
panel will be furnished upon request.

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be
taken. You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and
material evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this regard, it is
important to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.

Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the
applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

Sincerely,

W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director

Enclosure

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BUREAU OF NAVAL PERSONNEL
WASHINGTON. D.C. 20370-5000

IN REPLY   REFER TO
5420
Ser 

26/l 10
JUN 
'l 0 

1998

MEMORANDUM FOR BCNR

Via: BUPERS/BCNR  Coordinator

Encl: (1) BCNR File

1. Enclosure (1) is returned recommending disapproval
backdate his date of rank.

s request to

was selected by the Fourth Quarter FY97 Lieutenant Commander Spot

2.
Promotion Selection Board. The nomination for that board was confirmed by the
Senate on 2 March 1998.  
promotion will be appointed to the grade of LCDR effective on the date they report to
the qualifying billet or the date of Senate confirmation, which ever is later. He has no
entitlement to a back-date, furthermore, the instruction does not authorize retroactive
appointments or 
confirmation.

backpay, therefore, his date of rank will be the date of Senate

SECNAVINST 

1421.3H directs that officers selected for spot

3. Recommend disapproval of

request.

and Enlisted Advancements Division

cer Promotions



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02778-00

    Original file (02778-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    You alleged that your spot promotion correspondence was mailed for consideration by the FY 00 First Quarter Spot Selection Board, convened on 5 November 1999. A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 April 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02324-00

    Original file (02324-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The regulations approved by the Secretary of the Navy require that the naval record of Subject officer be corrected, where appropriate, in accordance with the of the Board. 14837-88 PERS-85 memo dtd 27 Jul 00 Subject ’s naval record 00 w/encls Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, 1. filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show SPOT promotion to lieutenant commander...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 08128-97

    Original file (08128-97.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    member's petition revealed the report to be a not observed because of the member's status as a student. The report contains the required comment in Subj: L , USN, d. Further review of the member's headquarters record revealed a report for the period of 1 July 1996 to 31 January 1997. front of the document is reflected. The report on file is incomplete as only the Since the member included a e. Review of Pers-322 selection board support files revealed an advanced message was sent to the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 01084-98

    Original file (01084-98.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 May 1999. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and In addition, the Board considered the advisory applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by the Bureau of Naval Personnel dated 20 April 1998, a copy of which is attached.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1998 | 07848-98

    Original file (07848-98.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show the lineal position, date of rank, and effective date in the grade of lieutenant commander he would have been assigned had he been confirmed in the expected time for an officer selected by the Fiscal Year 98 Lieutenant Commander Line Selection Board. The Board, consisting of Messrs....

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 01195-98

    Original file (01195-98.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 May 1999. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by the Bureau of Naval Personnel dated 23 March 1998, a copy of which is attached.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 09083-97

    Original file (09083-97.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In light of the information contained in the advisory opinion dated 16 April 1998, that the fitness report in question was forwarded for file on 26 August 1954, the Board found this report was probably in your In view of the above, your application has record for at least the been denied. The second gap identified by BUPERS was for the period of 6 April 1949 to 30 June 1949 and on 29 March 1954 BUPERS requested a fitness report from the member's reporting senior. was Subj: CD USNR(RET) We...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1998 | 05214-98

    Original file (05214-98.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinions furnished by the Navy Personnel Command dated 12 and 16 April 1999, copies of which are attached. Until 1 September 1995, as a member of the Ready Reserve, and as such, W= be considered by promotion - - selection boards. A complete review of Lieutenant Commander record reveals that there were no properly considered during either failure of selection per reference (c).

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05903-02

    Original file (05903-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    They recommended against a special board for the FY 03 g- The memorandum for the record at enclosure (5) documents that a representative of the Bureau of Naval Personnel Petitioner’s record to show commissioning as an SC officer on 1 February 2002 would not cause cognizant Navy authorities to place the officer, without the officer special selection board for the FY 03 SC Commander Selection Board. Recommend approval of their requests for back-dating of effective date of commissioning as...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08490-00

    Original file (08490-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show the date of rank and effective date of his SPOT promotion to lieutenant commander as 14 March 2000, the date he arrived at the SPOT billet, vice 6 October 2000. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of the enclosures, naval records, and applicable statutes, regulations...