Search Decisions

Decision Text

CG | BCMR | SRBs | 2002-023
Original file (2002-023.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 

 

 
Application for the Correction of 
the Coast Guard Record of: 

FINAL DECISION 
BCMR Docket No. 2002-023 

 
 

 

 

 
 

 

 
July 22, 2002 
Date 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 
 

SUMMARY OF THE RECORD 

The applicant asked the Board to correct his record to show that he reenlisted for 6 years 
on January 24, 2000, his 10th anniversary on active duty.  He alleged that he was erroneously 
counseled that there was no selective reenlistment bonus (SRB) available for him.  Therefore, he 
did not reenlist and instead extended his enlistment for just a year on May 8, 2000. He alleged 
that if he had been properly counseled, he would have reenlisted for 6 years to receive the SRB 
under ALDIST 184/99.  His record shows that he was erroneously counseled that there was no 
SRB multiple in effect for his rating on his 10th anniversary. 
 

The  Chief  Counsel  of  the  Coast  Guard  recommended  that  the  Board  grant  relief  by 

reenlisting the applicant for 6 years on his 10th active duty anniversary. 
 

FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS  

Under  COMDTINST  7220.33,  the  applicant  was  entitled  to  proper  counseling 
concerning his eligibility to reenlist for 6 years on his 10th active duty anniversary to receive an 
SRB under ALDIST 184/99.  The record indicates that the applicant was not properly counseled 
and that if he had been, he would have reenlisted for 6 years to receive the SRB.  Accordingly, 
relief should be granted by correcting his record to show that he reenlisted for 6 years on his 
10th active duty anniversary, January 24, 2000, and by voiding the extension contract he later 
signed.   
 

ORDER 

The military record of xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, USCG, shall be corrected to show 
that he reenlisted for 6 years on his 10th active duty anniversary, January 24, 2000, to receive an 
SRB under ALDIST 184/99.  Any other extension or reenlistment contract he has signed since 
that date shall be null and void.  The Coast Guard shall pay him the amount due as a result of 
this correction. 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 

 
 
Julia Andrews 

 

 
Michael K. Nolan 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 

 
Dorothy J. Ulmer 

 

 

 

 

 



Similar Decisions

  • CG | BCMR | SRBs | 2000-116

    Original file (2000-116.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    On that day, the Chief Counsel alleged, the applicant would have been eligible for a Zone B SRB with a multiple of one.3 Therefore, the Chief Counsel recommended that the Board correct the applicant’s record to show that he reenlisted on November 9, 1997, for 6 years to receive the maximum authorized Zone B SRB for his rating. (4) of Enclosure (1) to the SRB Instruction states that, to be eligible for a Zone B SRB, members must “[b]e serving in pay grade E-5 or higher.” To receive a Zone A...

  • CG | BCMR | SRBs | 2003-113

    Original file (2003-113.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Judge Advocate General of the Coast Guard recommended that the Board grant the applicant’s request because the record supports his allegation that he was not timely counseled. Under ALDIST 184/99, he was eligible to reenlist for 3, 4, 5, or 6 years to receive a Zone A SRB with a multiple of 3. If he had done so, he would not have been eligible to reenlist for 4 years on June 13, 2000, but he would have been eligible to reenlist on his 10th anniversary for a Zone B SRB with a multiple...

  • CG | BCMR | SRBs | 2000-051

    Original file (2000-051.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Coast Guard members who have served 6 or less years on active duty are in “Zone A.” Members may only receive one SRB per zone. On January 21, 2000, the applicant extended his enlistment for one year, through VIEWS OF THE COAST GUARD On July 28, 2000, the Chief Counsel of the Coast Guard recommended that the Board grant relief in this case. ORDER The application of XXXXXXXXXX, USCG, for correction of his military record is hereby granted as follows: His record shall be corrected to show...

  • CG | BCMR | SRBs | 2000-039

    Original file (2000-039.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    He alleged that if he had known about the requirement that he be in pay grade E-5 to receive a Zone B SRB, he would not have reenlisted for six years but would have 1 SRBs vary according to the length of each member’s active duty service, the length of the period of reenlistment or extension of enlistment, and the need of the Coast Guard for personnel with the member’s particular skills, which is reflected in the multiple used to calculate the bonus. Coast Guard members in pay grade E-5 and...

  • CG | BCMR | SRBs | 2000-057

    Original file (2000-057.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    APPLICANT’S ALLEGATIONS The applicant stated that on his tenth active duty anniversary, he was eligible for an SRB and that, pursuant to Coast Guard regulations, he should have been counseled about his eligibility. Coast Guard members who have served between 6 and 10 years on active duty are in “Zone B.” Members may only receive one SRB per zone. VIEWS OF THE COAST GUARD On August 2, 2000, the Chief Counsel of the Coast Guard recommended that the Board grant relief in this case.

  • CG | BCMR | SRBs | 2002-048

    Original file (2002-048.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Chief Counsel contended that the Board should find that the Coast Guard had no duty to counsel the applicant regarding the potential effect of his April 30, 1997 reenlistment on future SRB eligibility. of the Personnel Manual provides that members who receive PCS orders must be counseled about obligated service requirements and sign a page 7 documenting that counseling. The Board finds that if the applicant had received proper counseling, as urged by the Chief Counsel, the required...

  • CG | BCMR | SRBs | 2001-008

    Original file (2001-008.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    2001-008 Application for the Correction of the Coast Guard Record of: SUMMARY OF THE RECORD ANDREWS, Attorney-Advisor: The applicant asked the Board to correct his record to show that he reenlisted for 6 years on May 1, 2000, his 10th anniversary on active duty. On March 7, 2001, the Chief Counsel of the Coast Guard recommended that the Board correct the applicant’s record to show that he reenlisted for 6 years on his 10th anniversary. ORDER The military record of, shall be corrected to...

  • CG | BCMR | SRBs | 1999-177

    Original file (1999-177.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    This final decision, dated August 17, 2000, is signed by the three duly appointed RELIEF REQUESTED The applicant, an xxxxxxxxxxx on active duty in the Coast Guard, asked the Board to correct his military record by canceling a six-year reenlistment contract he signed on July 7, 1999. VIEWS OF THE COAST GUARD On May 24, 2000, the Chief Counsel of the Coast Guard recommended that the Board grant partial relief in this case.2 The Chief Counsel stated that the applicant’s reenlistment contract...

  • CG | BCMR | SRBs | 2004-147

    Original file (2004-147.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    This final decision, dated February 10, 2005, is signed by the three duly APPLICANT’S REQUEST AND ALLEGATIONS The applicant asked the Board to correct his record by voiding his 4-year reenlistment contract dated May 11, 2000, and replacing it with a 4-year reenlistment contract dated February 8, 2000, to receive a 6th active duty anniversary1 Zone A selective reenlistment bonus (SRB).2 The applicant alleged that he was never counseled that he could reenlist on his 6th anniversary of active...

  • CG | BCMR | SRBs | 2002-028

    Original file (2002-028.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    He stated that “if proper counseling was done, [the applicant] would have cancelled the two extensions from her commanding officer 1 According to the SRB regulation, a member must enlist or extend for a minimum of 36 months to receive an SRB. He further stated there is no requirement that the Coast Guard re- counsel its members about a subsequent ALCOAST announcing new SRB multiples. (3), states, in pertinent part, as follows: “Members with exactly 6 years active duty on the date of...