PART II - APPLICATION DATA
(Note: Part I deleted under the Privacy Act on Reading Room copy)
1. Character of Discharge: Under Other Than Honorable Conditions
2. Date of discharge (or REFRAD): 930731
3. Authority for separation:
a. Regulation: AR 135-178
b. Reason: NIF
4. Prior review(s): NONE
PART III - SERVICE HISTORY
SECTION A - Period of Service Under Review
1. Service data: 2. Awards and
decorations:
AAM
a. Period entered for: 8 Years GCMDL
b. Entry date: 900413 NDSM
c. Age: 18 Years DOB: 711222 ASR
d. Educational level: HS Grad OSR w/num 1
e. Aptitude area score:
GT: 112 3. Highest grade
achieved:
f. Length of Service: E4
3 Years 3 Months 9 Days
4. Performance evaluations:
NONE
PART III - SERVICE HISTORY
SECTION A - Period of Service Under Review - Continued
5. Periods of unauthorized absence: NONE
Status Inclusive dates
AWOL
Mil conf
Civil conf
Other
6. Nonjudicial punishment: NONE
Date Offense(s)
7. Court-Martial data: NONE
a. SCM:
Date Offense(s)
b. SPCM:
Date Offense(s)
c. GCM:
Date Offense(s)
8. Remarks: NONE
SECTION B - Prior Service Data
Other discharge(s):
Service From To Type Discharge
USAR 900413 900516 NA
RA 900517 921002 Honorable
(Concurrent Service)
PART IV - PREHEARING REVIEW
SECTION A-ANALYST’S ASSESSMENT
l. Facts and Circumstances:
a. The specific facts and circumstances pertaining to the
applicant’s discharge are not contained in the available records. Evidence
of record shows that on 31 July 1993, DA, HQ, 77th United States Army
Reserve Command, Fort Totten, Flushing, New York, Orders 127-11, discharged
the applicant from the United States Army Reserve, effective date 31 July
1993, with a characterization of service of under other than honorable
conditions discharge.
b. On 31 July 1993, the applicant was discharged. At the time of
discharge, the applicant had completed 3 year, 3 months, and 9 days of
total military service.
c. The applicant’s OMPF does not contain any information used as the
basis for his discharge. However, in the applicant’s statement
accompanying his DD Form 293 (Application for the Review of Discharge), he
states that he “made a bad judgment call and smoked marijuana, which
resulted in me testing positive and getting the discharge that I
received….”
2. Legal/Regulatory Basis for Separation Action: Army Regulation 135-178
provides for the separation of members of the Army National Guard and Army
Reserve when it is determined that a service member is unqualified for
further military service.
SECTION B-APPLICANT’S SUBMISSIONS
1. Issue(s) of propriety and/or equity submitted by applicant or counsel.
As stated on applicant’s DD Form 293.
2. Exhibit(s) submitted:
A-1: DD Form 293, dated 030831, with two (2) enclosures.
A-2: Counsel Issues: NONE
B-l: Other Documents: NONE
PART IV - PREHEARING REVIEW (CONTINUED)
SECTION C - Medical and/or Legal Advisory Opinion
Referred to ( ) Medical Advisor ( ) Legal Advisor
a. Medical prehearing comments (if applicable):
b. Legal prehearing comments (if applicable):
PART V - SUMMARY OF HEARING
SECTION A-Attendees and exhibits
1. Review/hearing information:
a. Type requested:
( X ) Records review ( ) Hearing
b. Type Held:
( X )Records review ( ) Hearing
( ) Tender Offer
c. Review/hearing location and date: Washington, DC on 10 May 2004.
d. Appearance by:
Applicant ( ) Yes ( X ) No
Counsel ( ) Yes ( X ) No
e. Applicant testified: ( ) Yes ( X ) No
f. Counsel presentation: ( ) Yes ( X ) No
g. Witness(es) testified: ( ) Yes ( X ) No
2. Exhibit(s) submitted at hearing:
PART VI - ISSUES AND FINDINGS
1. a. Applicant's issue(s) of propriety and/or equity:
( X ) Same as those listed on DD Form 293 and Part IV, Section A
of this case report and directive.
( ) Revised issue(s) furnished in writing by applicant as
follows:
( X ) Additional issue(s) identified during review/hearing as
follows:
Board Issue: (2) The characterization of service is too harsh.
b. Request: ( X ) Recharacterization ( ) Change of Reason
2. Finding(s), conclusion(s), and reason(s) for the Board's decision(s) on
issues of propriety and/or equity:
a. Propriety: The applicant has not submitted an issue of
propriety and the ADRB has not otherwise relied upon an
issue of propriety to change the discharge.
b. Equity: The parenthetical number(s) below correspond(s) to
the issue number(s) on the DD Form 293, or in Part VI,
Paragraph 1, above.
(2) The issue is accepted. The Board carefully examined the
available records for the period of enlistment under review.
Notwithstanding that the available record is void of the specific facts and
circumstances concerning the events that led to the applicant’s discharge
from the Reserve of the Army; the Board determined that the
characterization of service is inequitable. The Board believed the
applicant’s statement as to the reason for his discharge and found that his
misconduct was mitigated by service of sufficient merit to warrant an
upgrade of the discharge being reviewed. Accordingly, the Board voted to
grant partial relief in the form of an upgrade of characterization of
service to general, under honorable conditions. The Board determined that
the reason for discharge was both proper and equitable and voted not to
change it. This action entails a restoration of the applicant’s grade to
E4.
(1) The issue is rejected. The applicant, by his admitted
misconduct, diminished the quality of his service below that meriting a
fully honorable discharge. See response to issue (2) above.
3. Response(s) to item(s) not addressed as decisional issue(s): NONE
PART VII - BOARD ACTION
SECTION A - Conclusions/Decisions/Vote
1. Board conclusion(s):
The discharge was:
( X ) Proper.
( ) Improper as to characterization. Change characterization to
.
( ) Improper as to reason. Change reason to
under .
( ) Equitable.
( X ) Inequitable as to characterization. Change characterization to
General, Under Honorable Conditions.
( ) Inequitable as to reason. Change reason to
under .
( ) Both proper and equitable, but characterization/reason for
separation cited was an administrative/clerical error and should
be changed to under
.
2. Voting record: Change No Change
Reason 0 5
Characterization 5 0
The names and votes of the members of the Board are recorded in
Part IX of this document and can be obtained by writing to the address
below. The request must contain the CASE NO. located in the upper right
corner of this document.
Department of the Army Review Boards Agency
ATTN: Promulgation Team
1941 Jefferson Davis Highway, 2nd Floor
Arlington, VA 22202-4508
3. Minority views: NONE
PART VII - BOARD ACTION
SECTION B - Verification and Authentication
Case report reviewed and verified
MR. RIVERA
Case Reviewing Official
PART VIII - DIRECTIVE/CERTIFICATION
SECTION A - DIRECTIVE
TO: ARBA Support Division-St Louis Date: 14 May 2004
The Army Discharge Review Board, established under the provisions of
Section 30, Public Law 346, 78th Congress, 22 June 1944 and codified as
Title 10, United States Code, Section 1553, in the case of the applicant
named in Part I directs that the ARBA Support Division-St Louis issue the
applicant a new order discharging him from the Reserve of the Army which
reflects the following directed change(s):
( X ) Change characterization of discharge to General, Under
Honorable Conditions.
( X ) Other (see remarks below).
Remarks: This action entails a restoration of grade to E4.
SECTION B - CERTIFICATION
Approval Authority:
ROBERT L. HOUSE
Colonel, U.S. Army
President, Army Discharge
Review Board
Official:
MARY E. SHAW
Lieutenant Colonel, U.S. Army
Chief, Secretary Recorder
EXHIBITS:
A - Application for review of discharge C - Other
B - Material submitted by applicant
INDEX RECORD:
AR Number: 2003095912 INDEX NUMBERS: A9406
Date of Review: 040510 A9218
Character of Service: UD A0113
Date of Discharge: 930731
Authority: AR 135-178
Reason: A6770
Results of Board Action/
Vote/Affirmation: GD 5-0 A
PART IX - VOTING RECORD
Name Reason Characterization
CHANGE NC HON UHC NC
UNCHAR
1. Mbr X X
2. Mbr X X
3. Mbr X X
4. Mbr X X
5. PO X X
ARMY | DRB | CY1998 | 1998013766
Prior review(s): NONE PART III - SERVICE HISTORY SECTION A - Period of Service Under Review 1. The regulation also permitted the characterization of service as under honorable conditions, but did not authorize the characterization of service as honorable. The Board determined that the reason for discharge was proper and equitable and voted not to change it.
ARMY | DRB | CY2000 | 2000040562
The Board, being convinced that the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable, voted to deny relief.3. PART VII - BOARD ACTIONSECTION B - Verification and Authentication Case report reviewed and verified MRS. WADE Case Reviewing Official PART VIII - DIRECTIVE/CERTIFICATIONSECTION A - DIRECTIVE NONE SECTION B - CERTIFICATION Approval Authority:WILSON A. SHATZER Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review Board AR Number: 2000040562 INDEX...
ARMY | DRB | CY2000 | 2000047359
The Board may only change the characterization or reason for discharge. PART VII - BOARD ACTIONSECTION B - Verification and Authentication Case report reviewed and verified MS. WADE Case Reviewing Official PART VIII - DIRECTIVE/CERTIFICATIONSECTION A - DIRECTIVE NONE SECTION B - CERTIFICATION Approval Authority:WILSON A. SHATZER Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review Board EXHIBITS: A - Application for review of discharge C - Other B - Material submitted by applicant
ARMY | DRB | CY2003 | AR2003091772
On 8 February 1989, DA, US Army Reserve Personnel Center, St. Louis, MO, discharged the applicant effective 7 February 1989, under the provisions of Chapter 11, AR 135-178, by reason of expiration of service obligation with service characterized as honorable. Although the Board noted the applicant’s request to change his general discharge to a medical discharge, there does not appear to be a “general discharge” in the applicant’s official record. Minority views: NONE PART VII - BOARD...
ARMY | DRB | CY2000 | 2000039557
When discharged under this provision, Army policy states that the characterization of service will normally be under other than honorable conditions. The Board, being convinced that the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable, voted to deny relief.3. AR Number: 2000039557 INDEX NUMBERS: A9217 Date of Review: 000515 A0100 Character of Service: GD A9201 Date of Discharge: 960731 A9203 Authority: AR 135-178 C7 Reason: A6750 Results of Board...
ARMY | DRB | CY2003 | AR2003090214
If the applicant is still interested in obtaining a copy of her Line of Duty Investigation and associated medical records, she should make application directly to St. Louis on Standard Form (SF) 180 (Request Pertaining to Military Records). The Board, being convinced that the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were proper and equitable, voted to deny relief. Minority views: NONE PART VII - BOARD ACTION SECTION B - Verification and Authentication Case report reviewed...
ARMY | DRB | CY2002 | 2002067602
However, in review of the applicants entire service record, the Board found that these accomplishments did not overcome the reason for discharge and characterization of service granted. It also noted that the characterization of service for this type of discharge is normally under other than honorable conditions and that the applicant was aware of that prior to requesting discharge. The Board, being convinced that the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both...
ARMY | DRB | CY2004 | AR2004103372
Remarks: NONE SECTION B - Prior Service Data Other discharge(s): Service From To Type Discharge RA 930806 951125 Honorable USARNG 951126 990219 NA PART IV - PREHEARING REVIEW SECTION A-ANALYST’S ASSESSMENT l. Facts and Circumstances: a. However, the applicant’s record contains a properly constituted order issued by Department of the Army, U.S. Army Reserve Personnel Command discharging the applicant from the United States Army Reserve, effective 7 August 2001, by authority of AR 135- 178...
ARMY | DRB | CY2004 | AR20040000655
Remarks: NONE SECTION B - Prior Service Data NONE Other discharge(s): Service From To Type Discharge PART IV - PREHEARING REVIEW SECTION A-ANALYST’S ASSESSMENT l. Facts and Circumstances: a. The characterization of service will normally be under other than honorable conditions. SECTION B - CERTIFICATION Approval Authority: ROBERT L. HOUSE Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review Board Official: MARY E. SHAW Lieutenant Colonel, U.S. Army Chief, Secretary Recorder EXHIBITS: A -...
ARMY | DRB | CY2000 | 2000035969
A-2: Counsel Issues: NONE B-l: Other Documents: NONE C-1: DD Form 149, dated 000119. However, the Board found that these accomplishments did not overcome the reason for discharge and characterization of service granted. PART VII - BOARD ACTIONSECTION B - Verification and Authentication Case report reviewed and verified MS. WADE Case Reviewing Official PART VIII - DIRECTIVE/CERTIFICATIONSECTION A - DIRECTIVE NONE SECTION B - CERTIFICATION Approval Authority:THOMAS J. ALLEN Colonel, U.S....