PART II - APPLICATION DATA

      (Note: Part I deleted under the Privacy Act on Reading Room copy)

1.  Character of Discharge:  Under Other Than Honorable Conditions

2.  Date of discharge (or REFRAD):  020813

3.  Authority for separation:

      a.  Regulation:  Chapter 13, AR 135-178

      b.  Reason:  Unsatisfactory Participation

4.  Prior review(s):  NONE



                         PART III - SERVICE HISTORY

                 SECTION A - Period of Service Under Review

1.    Service data:                              2.  Awards and
    decorations:
                                           NONE
    a.  Period entered for:  NIF*
    b.  Entry date:  900725
    c.  Age:  20 Years   DOB:  700213


    d.  Educational level:  HS Grad


    e.  Aptitude area score:
          GT:  NIF                               3.  Highest grade
achieved:
    f.  Length of Service:                         E4
          12 Year(s)  0 Month(s)  8 Day(s)


                                               4.  Performance evaluations:

                                                   NONE

*Applicant enlisted as a Reserve of the Army on 900725.  One extension for
a
period of 8 months (establishing ETS of 990124) is in the record.  No other
enlistment contracts were available.
                         PART III - SERVICE HISTORY
           SECTION A - Period of Service Under Review - Continued

5.  Periods of unauthorized absence:  NONE

    Status       Inclusive dates
      AWOL

      Mil conf

      Civil conf

      Other


6.  Nonjudicial punishment:  NONE

      Date  Offense(s)



7.  Court-Martial data:  NONE

      a.  SCM:
            Date   Offense(s)


      b.  SPCM:
            Date   Offense(s)


      c.  GCM:
            Date   Offense(s)


8.    Remarks:  NONE


                       SECTION B - Prior Service Data
                                    NONE

Other discharge(s):

      Service    From  To    Type Discharge





                         PART IV - PREHEARING REVIEW

                       SECTION A-ANALYST’S ASSESSMENT
l.  Facts and Circumstances:

      a.  Evidence of record shows that on 2 March 2002, the unit commander
notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the
provisions of Chapter l3, AR 135-178, by reason of unsatisfactory
participation, with a general, under honorable conditions discharge.  In
this notification she was advised that failure to respond within 30 days of
receipt would constitute a waiver of her rights.  The notification was
properly sent by certified mail.  The applicant failed to respond within 30
days.  The unit commander subsequently recommended separation from the
service and waiver of further rehabilitative efforts.  On 12 April 2002,
the intermediate commander recommended approval of the applicant’s
separation with a general, under honorable conditions discharge.  The
separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed
that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of
under other than honorable conditions.

      b.  On 13 August 2002, the applicant was discharged.  At the time of
discharge, the applicant had completed 12 years and 8 days of active
military service in the period under review.

      c.  Army regulations stipulate that it is inappropriate if a soldier
meets eligibility for the Mobilization Asset Transfer Program (MATP) to be
discharged under the provisions of AR 135-178, Chapter 13.  However, the
separation approving authority determined that the applicant would not be
transferred to the Individual Ready Reserve in accordance with the MATP as
she did not possess the necessary qualifications for potential for useful
service under conditions of full mobilization and continued military
service.

2.  Legal/Regulatory Basis for Separation Action:  Army Regulation 135-178
sets forth the basic authority for the separation of Reserve enlisted
personnel.  Chapter 13, provides in pertinent part that individuals can be
separated for being an unsatisfactory participant.  A member is an
unsatisfactory participant when nine or more unexcused absences from
scheduled drills occur during a 1 year period.  The characterization of
service will normally be under other than honorable conditions.


                      SECTION B-APPLICANT’S SUBMISSIONS


1.  Issue(s) of propriety and/or equity submitted by applicant or counsel.
    As stated on applicant’s DD Form 293.

2.  Exhibit(s) submitted:

      A-1:  DD Form 293, dated 040428, with multiple enclosure(s).
      A-2:  Counsel Issues:  NONE
      B-l:  Other Documents: NONE


                   PART IV - PREHEARING REVIEW (CONTINUED)

              SECTION C - Medical and/or Legal Advisory Opinion


Referred to ( ) Medical Advisor      ( ) Legal Advisor



      a.  Medical prehearing comments (if applicable):


      b.  Legal prehearing comments (if applicable):












                         PART V - SUMMARY OF HEARING


                      SECTION A-Attendees and exhibits

1.  Review/hearing information:


      a. Type requested:
         ( X ) Records review             (   ) Hearing

      b. Type Held:
         ( X )Records review              (   ) Hearing
                                          (   ) Tender Offer

      c. Review/hearing location and date:  Washington, D.C. on 21 December
2004.

      d. Appearance by:
         Applicant                 (   ) Yes   ( X ) No
         Counsel                   (   ) Yes   ( X ) No

      e.  Applicant testified:     (   ) Yes   ( X ) No

      f.  Counsel presentation:    (   ) Yes   ( X ) No

      g.  Witness(es) testified:   (   ) Yes   ( X ) No

2.  Exhibit(s) submitted at hearing:
                        PART VI - ISSUES AND FINDINGS

1.  a.  Applicant's issue(s) of propriety and/or equity:

          ( X )  Same as those listed on DD Form 293 and Part IV, Section A
              of this case report and directive.
          (   )  Revised issue(s) furnished in writing by applicant as
              follows:
          ( X )  Additional issue(s) identified during review/hearing as
              follows:

        Board Issue:  (2)  The characterization of service is too harsh.

      b.  Request:  ( X ) Recharacterization     (   ) Change of Reason

2.  Finding(s), conclusion(s), and reason(s) for the Board's decision(s) on
issues of propriety and/or equity:

      a.  Propriety:   The applicant has not submitted an issue of
                   propriety and the ADRB has not otherwise relied upon an
                   issue of propriety to change the discharge.

      b.  Equity:      The parenthetical number(s) below correspond(s) to
                   the issue number(s) on the DD Form 293, or in Part VI,
                   Paragraph 1, above.

        (1)  The issue is rejected.  See response to issue (2) below.

        (2)  The issue is accepted.  The Board carefully examined the
applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment under review.
 There was a full consideration of all faithful and honorable service as
well as the infractions of discipline, the extent thereof, and the
seriousness of the offenses.  The Board does not condone the applicant’s
misconduct; however, it determined that the characterization of service is
too harsh.  The applicant's misconduct was mitigated by service of
sufficient length and merit to warrant a partial upgrade of the
characterization of service.  However, the applicant, by her misconduct and
poor duty performance diminished the quality of her service below that
meriting a fully honorable discharge.  Accordingly, the Board voted to
grant partial relief in the form of an upgrade of characterization of
service to general, under honorable conditions.  The Board determined that
the reason for discharge was both proper and equitable and voted not to
change it.

3.  Response(s) to item(s) not addressed as decisional issue(s):  NONE

                           PART VII - BOARD ACTION
                   SECTION A - Conclusions/Decisions/Vote

1.    Board conclusion(s):

      The discharge was:

      ( X ) Proper.
      (   ) Improper as to characterization.  Change characterization to
                                               .
      (   ) Improper as to reason.  Change reason to
                                   under                      .

      (   ) Equitable.
      ( X ) Inequitable as to characterization.  Change characterization to
           General, Under Honorable Conditions.
      (   ) Inequitable as to reason.  Change reason to
                                 
            under                                 .
      (   ) Both proper and equitable, but characterization/reason for
           separation cited was an administrative/clerical error and should
           be changed to                      under
                                   .

2.  Voting record:      Change   No Change
                  Reason       0         5
    Characterization       3         2

        The names and votes of the members of the Board are recorded in
Part IX of this document and can be obtained by writing to the address
below.  The request must contain the CASE NO. located in the upper right
corner of this document.

                  Department of the Army Review Boards Agency
                  ATTN:  Promulgation Team
                  1901 South Bell Street, 2nd Floor
                  Arlington, VA  22202-4508



3.  Minority views:  NONE
                           PART VII - BOARD ACTION
                 SECTION B - Verification and Authentication

Case report reviewed and verified

                          
Ms. McKim-Spilker
Case Reviewing Official

                     PART VIII - DIRECTIVE/CERTIFICATION
                            SECTION A - DIRECTIVE

TO: ARBA Support Division-St Louis      Date:  23 December 2004

     The Army Discharge Review Board, established under the provisions of
Section 30, Public Law 346, 78th Congress, 22 June 1944 and codified as
Title 10, United States Code, Section 1553, in the case of the applicant
named in Part I directs that the ARBA Support Division-St Louis issue a
discharge order to the applicant which reflects the following directed
change(s):

           ( X ) Change characterization of discharge to General, Under
                 Honorable Conditions.
           ( X ) Other (see remarks below).

Remarks:  This action entails voiding discharge order (HQ, 89th Regional
          Spt Cmd, Wichita, KS) and reissuing a new discharge order.  The
          new discharge order should reflect characterization of service as
          GD and a restoration of grade to private first class/E-3.

                          SECTION B - CERTIFICATION

Approval Authority:


ROBERT L. HOUSE
Colonel, U.S. Army
President, Army Discharge
   Review Board

Official:




MARY E. SHAW
Lieutenant Colonel, U.S. Army
Chief, Secretary Recorder

EXHIBITS:
A - Application for review of discharge                  C - Other
B - Material submitted by applicant

INDEX RECORD:

AR Number:  20040000655                   INDEX NUMBERS:  A9406
Date of Review:  041221                                   A9218
Character of Service:  UD                                 A0100
Date of Discharge:  020813
Authority:  AR 135-178 C13
Reason:  A8400
Results of Board Action/
Vote/Affirmation:  GD 3-2 A


                           PART IX - VOTING RECORD

    Name                                   Reason          Characterization
                                           CHANGE   NC     HON  UHC   NC
UNCHAR

    1.      Mbr          X            X            

    2.      Mbr          X            X           

    3.      Mbr          X                 X       

    4.      Mbr          X            X            

    5.      PO           X                 X