Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | DRB | CY2000 | 2000047359
Original file (2000047359.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
PART II - APPLICATION DATA

(Note: Part I deleted under the Privacy Act on Reading Room copy)

1. Character of Discharge: Uncharacterized

2. Date of discharge (or REFRAD): 980820

3. Authority for separation:

         a. Regulation: AR 135-178

          b. Reason: Misconduct
4. Prior review(s): NONE


PART III - SERVICE HISTORY

SECTION A - Period of Service Under Review

 1.       Service data: 2. Awards and decorations:
                            NONE
a. Period entered for: 8 Years
b. Entry date: 970407
c. Age: 28 Years DOB: 680529
d. Educational level: 16 Years
e. Aptitude area score:
          GT: 126 3. Highest grade achieved:
f. Length of Service: E4
1 Year(s) 4 Month(s) 14 Day(s)

4. Performance evaluations:
NONE

PART III - SERVICE HISTORY
SECTION A - Period of Service Under Review - Continued

5. Periods of unauthorized absence: NONE

 Status Inclusive dates
         AWOL

         Mil conf

         Civil conf

         Other


6. Nonjudicial punishment: NONE
         Date     Offense(s)
        


7. Court-Martial data: NONE
         a. SCM:
                  Date Offense(s)

        
         b. SPCM:
                  Date Offense(s)

         c. GCM: 
                  Date Offense(s)


8.       Remarks: NONE
SECTION B - Prior Service Data
NONE

Other discharge(s):

          Service   From      To        Type Discharge





PART IV - PREHEARING REVIEW

SECTION A-ANALYST’S ASSESSMENT
l. Facts and Circumstances:

         a. Evidence of record shows that on 15 December 1997, the applicant requested that his training reservation for MOS 38A10 seat be cancelled because of job conflict. On 15 December 1997, the unit commander recommended disapproval. On 31 December 1997, the MSG, USA, USAR Operations NCOIC cancelled the applicant’s active duty training and shipped a discharge packet for initiation of separation under the provisions of AR 135-178. On 11 May 1998, the unit commander requested entry level separation for the following reason: the applicant failed to ship due to apathy. On 20 August 1998, the Department of the Army, Headquarters, US Army Special Operations Command, Fort Bragg, NC; Orders 232-26 discharged the applicant from the US Army Reserve with an uncharacterized discharge due to his failure to report for training.

         b. On 20 August 1998, the applicant was discharged. At the time of discharge, the applicant had 1 year, 4 months, and 14 days service on his current enlistment under review.

2. Legal/Regulatory Basis for Separation Action : Army Regulation 135-178 (Separation of Enlisted Personnel) provides for the separation of enlisted personnel of the United States Army Reserve (USAR) and Army National Guard of the United States (ARNGUS). This regulation establishes policies, standards, and procedures governing the administrative separation of enlisted soldiers from the USAR and the ARNGUS.
SECTION B-APPLICANT’S SUBMISSIONS


 1. Issue(s) of propriety and/or equity submitted by applicant or counsel.
As stated on applicant’s DD Form 293.
2. Exhibit(s) submitted:

         A-1: DD Form 293, dated 000904, with one (1) enclosure(s).
         A-2: Counsel Issues: NONE
         B-l: Other Documents: NONE

PART IV - PREHEARING REVIEW (CONTINUED)



SECTION C - Medical and/or Legal Advisory Opinion


Referred to ( ) Medical Advisor ( ) Legal Advisor



 a. Medical prehearing comments (if applicable):

b. Legal prehearing comments (if applicable):
PART V - SUMMARY OF HEARING

SECTION A-Attendees and exhibits

1. Review/hearing information:

         a. Type requested:
         ( X ) Records review ( ) Hearing

         b. Type Held:
         ( X )Records review ( ) Hearing
         ( ) Tender Offer

         c. Review/hearing location and date: Washington, DC on 25 October 2000 .

         d. Appearance by:
         Applicant ( ) Yes ( X ) No
         Counsel ( ) Yes ( X ) No
         e. Applicant testified: ( ) Yes ( X ) No
        
         f. Counsel presentation: ( ) Yes ( X ) No
        
         g. Witness(es) testified: ( ) Yes ( X ) No
        
2. Exhibit(s) submitted at hearing:

PART VI - ISSUES AND FINDINGS

1. a. Applicant's issue(s) of propriety and/or equity:

          ( X )   Same as those listed on DD Form 293 and Part IV, Section A of this case report and directive.
         ( )     Revised issue(s) furnished in writing by applicant as follows:
         ( )     Additional issue(s) identified during review/hearing as follows:
         b. Request: ( X ) Recharacterization ( X ) Change of Reason


2. Finding(s), conclusion(s), and reason(s) for the Board's decision(s) on issues of propriety and/or equity:

          a. Propriety:    The applicant has not submitted an issue of propriety and the ADRB has not otherwise relied upon an issue of propriety to change the discharge.

          b. Equity:       The parenthetical number(s) below correspond(s) to the issue number(s) on the DD Form 293, or in Part VI, Paragraph 1, above:

 (1) The issue is rejected. The Board carefully examined the applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment under review and the documents submitted with his application. The Board noted the applicant’s contentions; however, the record does not support his contentions and he has provided no corroborating evidence to support them. The Board determined that the applicant failed to report for training and discharge proceedings were properly initiated under the provisions of Army Regulation 135-178 by reason of failure to report for training with an uncharacterized discharge. The Board was satisfied that all requirements of law and regulations were met and the rights of the applicant were fully protected throughout the separation process. The Board, being convinced that the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable, voted to deny relief.

 (2) The issue is rejected. Eligibility for veteran's benefits, to include educational benefits under the Montgomery GI Bill, does not fall within the purview of the Army Discharge Review Board. Accordingly, the applicant should contact a local office of the Department of Veterans Affairs for further assistance.
(3) The issue is rejected. The Army Discharge Review Board is not empowered to return former service members to the armed forces nor does it track the status of former service members. The Board may only change the characterization or reason for discharge. If the applicant desires to reenlist, he should contact the local recruiter to determine his eligibility to reenlist. Those individuals can best advise a former service member as to the present needs of the Army.

 3. Response(s) to item(s) not addressed as decisional issue(s): NONE
PART VII - BOARD ACTION
SECTION A - Conclusions/Decisions/Vote

1.       Board conclusion(s):

         The discharge was:

          ( X )    Proper.
         ( )      Improper as to characterization. Change characterization to                                      .
         ( )      Improper as to reason. Change reason to                         under                       .

         ( X )    Equitable.
         ( )      Inequitable as to characterization. Change characterization to                                .
         ( )      Inequitable as to reason. Change reason to                       
                  under                                  .
         ( )      Both proper and equitable, but characterization/reason for separation cited was an administrative/clerical error and should be changed to                      under                          .
2. Voting record: Change No Change
         Reason 0 5
Characterization 0 5

         The names and votes of the members of the Board are recorded in Part IX of this document and can be obtained by writing to the address below. The request must contain the CASE NO. located in the upper right corner of this document.

Department of the Army Review Boards Agency
ATTN: Promulgation Team
1941 Jefferson Davis Highway, 2nd Floor
Arlington, VA 22202-4508



3. Minority views: NONE

PART VII - BOARD ACTION
SECTION B - Verification and Authentication

Case report reviewed and verified       

                                 
MS. WADE
Case Reviewing Official 

PART VIII - DIRECTIVE/CERTIFICATION
SECTION A - DIRECTIVE
NONE
SECTION B - CERTIFICATION

Approval Authority:


WILSON A. SHATZER
Colonel, U.S. Army
President, Army Discharge
Review Board

Official:




EARNEST C. SMITH, JR.
Lieutenant Colonel, U.S. Army
Chief, Secretary Recorder

EXHIBITS:
A - Application for review of discharge          C - Other
B - Material submitted by applicant

INDEX RECORD:

 AR Number: 2000047359 INDEX NUMBERS: A9217
Date of Review: 001025 A0100
Character of Service: EL A9445
Date of Discharge: 980820 A9201
Authority: AR 635-178
Reason: A6000
Results of Board Action/
Vote/Affirmation: NC 5-0 A













PART IX - VOTING RECORD



 Name  Reason Characterization
 CHANGE NC HON UHC NC UNCHAR

1.      Mbr      X          X    

2.      Mbr      X          X    

3.      Mbr      X          X    

4.      Mbr      X          X    

5.      PO      X          X    






Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2000 | 2000044950

    Original file (2000044950.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board noted that the applicant’s record contains a separation order from the Reserve of the Army discharging him under the provisions of Army regulation 135-178 with an uncharacterized discharge. The Board, being convinced that the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were proper and equitable, voted to deny relief.3. AR Number: 2000044950 INDEX NUMBERS: A9217 Date of Review: 000927 A0100 Character of Service: EL A9445 Date of Discharge: 970828 Authority: AR...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2001 | 2001058792

    Original file (2001058792.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The evidence of record available to the Board shows that the applicant was discharged from the Army National Guard under the provisions of Chapter 13, AR 135-178 & paragraph 1-26k, by reason of unsatisfactory participation with a character of service of general, under honorable conditions. The Board, being convinced that the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable, voted to deny relief.3. EXHIBITS: A - Application for review of discharge C -...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY1999 | 1999024442

    Original file (1999024442.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Accordingly, the Board, being convinced that the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable, voted to deny relief.3. PART VII - BOARD ACTIONSECTION B - Verification and Authentication Case report reviewed and verified MRS. WADE Case Reviewing Official PART VIII - DIRECTIVE/CERTIFICATIONSECTION A - DIRECTIVE NONE SECTION B - CERTIFICATION Approval Authority:THOMAS J. ALLEN Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review Board EXHIBITS: A -...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2000 | 2000048666

    Original file (2000048666.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board, being convinced that the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were proper and equitable, voted to deny relief3. EXHIBITS: A - Application for review of discharge C - Other B - Material submitted by applicant AR Number: 2000048666 INDEX NUMBERS: A9217 Date of Review: 010110 A9235 Character of Service: GD A0100 Date of Discharge: 990811 Authority: AR 135-178 Reason: A8400 Results of Board Action/ Vote/Affirmation: NC 5-0 A Name Reason Characterization...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2003 | 2003086235

    Original file (2003086235.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 1 February 2000, the applicant was discharged. EXHIBITS: A - Application for review of discharge C - Other B - Material submitted by applicant AR Number: 2003086235 INDEX NUMBERS: A9321 Date of Review: 030924 A9217 Character of Service: EL A0143 Date of Discharge: 000201 Authority: AR 135-178 C6 Reason: A2800 Results of Board Action/ Vote/Affirmation: NC 5-0 A Name Reason Characterization CHANGENCHONUHCNCUNCHAR 1.

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2001 | 2001056391

    Original file (2001056391.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 21 March 1995, the applicant was discharged. However, the Board found that these accomplishments did not overcome the reason for discharge and characterization of service granted. AR Number: 2001056391 INDEX NUMBERS: A9217 Date of Review: 010809 A9221 Character of Service: EL A0113 Date of Discharge: 950321 Authority: AR 135-178 C5 Reason: A2900 Results of Board Action/ Vote/Affirmation: NC 5-0 A Name Reason Characterization CHANGENCHONUHCNCUNCHAR 1.

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2003 | AR2003091767

    Original file (AR2003091767.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Remarks: NONE SECTION B - Prior Service Data NONE Other discharge(s): Service From To Type Discharge PART IV - PREHEARING REVIEW SECTION A-ANALYST’S ASSESSMENT l. Facts and Circumstances: a. On 6 January 2003, the applicant was discharged. Minority views: NONE PART VII - BOARD ACTION SECTION B - Verification and Authentication Case report reviewed and verified Ms. McKim-Spilker Case Reviewing Official PART VIII - DIRECTIVE/CERTIFICATION SECTION A - DIRECTIVE NONE SECTION B -...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2000 | 2000044263

    Original file (2000044263.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Change reason to Secretarial Authority under Section II, Paragraph 4-4, AR 135-178. EXHIBITS: A - Application for review of discharge C - Other B - Material submitted by applicant AR Number: 2000044263 INDEX NUMBERS: A9456 Date of Review: 000823 A1200 Character of Service: EL A0100 Date of Discharge: 990601 Authority: AR 135-178 C6 Reason: A4900 Results of Board Action/ Vote/Affirmation: MD 5-0 A Name Reason Characterization CHANGENCHONUHCNCUNCHAR 1.

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2004 | AR2004105392

    Original file (AR2004105392.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board noted that the applicant’s record contains a properly constituted discharge order indicating that he was discharged from the Army Reserve under the provisions of AR 135-178, with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. The Board, being convinced that the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable, voted to deny relief. Minority views: NONE PART VII - BOARD ACTION SECTION B - Verification and Authentication Case report reviewed...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY1998 | 1998013766

    Original file (1998013766.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Prior review(s): NONE PART III - SERVICE HISTORY SECTION A - Period of Service Under Review 1. The regulation also permitted the characterization of service as under honorable conditions, but did not authorize the characterization of service as honorable. The Board determined that the reason for discharge was proper and equitable and voted not to change it.