Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110013751
Original file (20110013751.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		

		BOARD DATE:	  12 January 2012

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20110013751 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show the Vietnam Service Medal (VSM) and Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device 1960 (RVNCM).

2.  The applicant states he was awarded the VSM and RVNCM; however, these awards were mistakenly omitted from his DD Form 214.

3.  The applicant provides a copy of his DD Form 214 and page 2 of a letter.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant's records show he was inducted into the Army of the United States on 30 August 1966.  He was trained in, awarded, and served in military occupational specialty 91B (Medical Specialist).  

3.  Item 31 (Foreign Service) of his DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows he served in Thailand from 14 March 1967 to 11 March 1968.  Item 38 (Record of Assignments) shows he served with the 31st Field Hospital during this period of service.  It does not show he directly supported operations in the RVN

4.  There are no permanent change of station (PCS) orders, temporary duty orders, or any other official documents in his service records that show he was ordered to or served in the Republic of Vietnam (RVN).  In addition, there are no documents to show he ever served in direct support of operations in the RVN during his foreign service.

5.  He was honorably released from active duty on 29 August 1968 and transferred to the U.S. Army Reserve Control Group (Annual Training) to complete his remaining Reserve obligation.  His DD Form 214 shows the following entries:

* item 22c (Foreign and/or Sea Service) – U.S. Army Pacific (USARPAC) for a period of 11 months, and 28 days
* item 24 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations, and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) does not show any Vietnam service-related awards

6.  The applicant provides page two of a letter from an unknown source dated
21 June 2011.  It shows the Tactical Army Command, Integrated Logistics Support Center, Clothing and Heraldry Product Support Integration Directorate, shipped him the VSM and RVNCM.

7.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) prescribes Army policy and criteria concerning individual military awards.  

   a.  Paragraph 2-13 contains guidance on award of the VSM and it states it is awarded to all members of the Armed Forces of the United States serving in Vietnam and the contiguous waters or airspace there over after 3 July 1965 through 28 March 1973.  Members of the Armed Forces of the United States in Thailand, Laos, or Cambodia, or the airspace there over, during the same period and serving in direct support of operations in Vietnam are also eligible for this award.

	b.  Paragraph 9-13 contains guidance on award of the RVNCM.  It is authorized for members who served in the RVN for 6 months or more during the period 1 March 1961 through 28 March 1973.  It is also authorized for those who served outside of the geographical limits of the RVN and contributed direct combat support to the RVN and Armed Forces for 6 months.
 
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

The evidence of record confirms the applicant's foreign service was performed in Thailand; however, it fails to provide any evidence to show he ever served in direct support of operations in the RVN.  As a result, the regulatory criteria necessary for award of the VSM and the RVNCM has not been satisfied in this case.  Accordingly, there is insufficient evidence to grant relief in this case.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

_x____  ____x____  __x______  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




      _______ _ x  _______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110013751



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110013751



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080016899

    Original file (20080016899.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's record shows he was inducted into the Army of the United States and entered active duty on 15 December 1965. Therefore, absent any evidence indicating that the applicant's unit or he served in direct support of operations in the RVN, the regulatory criteria necessary to support award of the RVNCM and/or the VSM for service in Thailand has not been satisfied in this case. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080017075

    Original file (20080017075.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that he be awarded the Vietnam Service Medal (VSM) based on his service in Thailand. By regulation, the VSM and RVNCM are authorized for members who served in Thailand in units providing direct support to Republic of Vietnam (RVN) operations. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by showing he is eligible for the VSM and RVNCM with Device (1960) based on his service in Thailand;...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-02634

    Original file (BC-2005-02634.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    --The Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal (RVNCM) is awarded to members who: (1) served for six months in South Vietnam during the period 1 Mar 61 and 28 Mar 73; (2) served outside the geographical limits of South Vietnam and contributed direct combat support to the RVN Armed Forces for an aggregate of six months--only members who meet the criteria established for the AFEM (Vietnam) or the VSM during the period required are considered to have contributed direct combat support to the RVN Armed...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-05372

    Original file (BC-2012-05372.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-05372 COUNSEL: NONE ________________________________________________________________ _ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be awarded the following awards: 1. After a thorough review of the applicant’s official military personnel record they were unable to verify award of the RVCM and the VSM. The applicant’s claimed dates of service in Thailand are after the award inclusive period for...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-02086

    Original file (BC-2006-02086.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant's complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. He served in Thailand from Apr 74 to Mar 75; therefore, he is not eligible for the VSM. _________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC- 2006-02086 in Executive Session on 19 September 2006, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: Ms. Kathleen F. Graham, Panel Chair Mr. Elwood C. Lewis, Member Ms. LeLoy W. Contrell, Member The following...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-01681

    Original file (BC-2006-01681.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He should be awarded the VSM and RVNCM for serving in support of the Vietnam War while stationed in Alaska. The DPPPR evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: He disagrees with the Air Force recommendation for the simple reason that Alaska was considered in the Vietnam Theater during the period when he...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2011-02673

    Original file (BC-2011-02673.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant’s DD Form 214 reflects that he was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal (VSM) and the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal (RVNCM). We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-03321

    Original file (BC-2010-03321.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The DPAPP complete evaluation is at Exhibit C. AFPC/DPSIDR recommends denial of the VSM and RVNCM. The DPSIDR complete evaluation is at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the applicant on 10 Dec 10 for review and comment within 30 days. _________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-03271

    Original file (BC-2010-03271.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-03271 COUNSEL: HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ THE APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be awarded the Vietnam Service Medal (VSM) and the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal (RVNCM). ________________________________________________________________ THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPAPP recommends denial, stating, in part, after a...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-01875

    Original file (BC-2005-01875.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-01875 INDEX CODE: 107.00 COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: No MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 14 Dec 06 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214 reflect award of the Vietnam Service Medal (VSM), the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal (RVNCM), and the Air Force Overseas Ribbon (AFOSR), and his service in Vietnam. A...