Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-05372
Original file (BC-2012-05372.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS


IN THE MATTER OF:	DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2012-05372
		COUNSEL:  NONE
	
________________________________________________________________
_

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

He be awarded the following awards:

1.  Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal (RVCM).

2.  Vietnam Service Medal (VSM).

________________________________________________________________
_

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

He should have been awarded the RVCM and VSM for his service in 
Thailand from January through March 1975.

In support of the applicant’s appeal, he provides copies of his 
military personnel records.

The applicant's complete submission, with attachments, is at 
Exhibit A.

________________________________________________________________
_

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

The applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force on 22 April 
1969.

On 6 September 1971, the applicant was honorably discharged 
under the provisions of AFM 39-10.  He served a total of 2 
years, 4 months and 14 days on active duty and was credited with 
no foreign and/or sea service.

AFPC/DPSID verified the applicant’s entitlement to the Air Force 
Outstanding Unit Award (AFOUA).  Upon final board decision, 
administrative correction of the applicant’s official military 
personnel record will be completed by AFPC/DPSOY.

The RVCM is awarded to members of the US armed forces who, 
during the period 1 March 1961 through 28 March 1973, served for 
six months in South Vietnam, or served outside the geographical 
limits of South Vietnam and contributed direct combat support to 
the RVN Armed Forces for an aggregate of six months.  Only those 
who meet the criteria established for the Armed Forces 
Expeditionary Medal (AFEM) (Vietnam) or the VSM during the 
period of service are considered to have contributed direct 
combat support the RVN Armed Forces.

The VSM is awarded to service members of the Armed Forces who 
served at any time between 4 July 1965 and 28 March 1973, in 
Vietnam, its contiguous waters, or airspace thereover; or in 
Thailand, Laos, or Cambodia, or the airspaces thereover.  To be 
eligible, a service member must be:  (1) attached or regularly 
serving for one, or more, days with an organization 
participating in or directly supporting ground (military) 
operations, (2) attached to or regularly serving for one, or 
more, days aboard a naval vessel directly supporting military 
operations, (3) actually participate as a crew member in one or 
more aerial flights directly supporting military operations, or 
(4) serve on temporary duty for 30 consecutive days or 60 
nonconsecutive days, time limitations which may be waived for 
personnel participating in actual combat operations.

________________________________________________________________
_

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPSID recommends denial.  DPSID states the RVCM is awarded 
to members of the Armed Forces of the United States who between 
1 March 1961 and 28 March 1973, served for six months in South 
Vietnam during this period; served outside the geographical 
limits of South Vietnam and contributed direct combat support to 
the Republic of Vietnam Armed Forces for an aggregate of six 
months.

The VSM is awarded to all service members of the Armed Services 
who between 4 July 1965 and 28 March 1973, served in the 
following areas of Southeast Asia: Vietnam and the contiguous 
waters and airspace; in Thailand, Laos, or Cambodia or the 
airspace thereof and in the direct support of military 
operations in Vietnam for 30 consecutive days or 60 non-
consecutive days.

After a thorough review of the applicant’s official military 
personnel record they were unable to verify award of the RVCM 
and the VSM.  The applicant’s claimed dates of service in 
Thailand are after the award inclusive period for the VSM and 
the RVCM. Furthermore, boots on ground in Thailand could not be 
verified.  The applicant did not serve in the area of 
eligibility for 30 consecutive days or 60 non-consecutive days 
during the award inclusive period.

The DPSID complete evaluation is at Exhibit C.

________________________________________________________________
_






APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

On 8 February 2013, a copy of the Air Force evaluation was 
forwarded to the applicant for review and response within 
30 days (Exhibit D).  As of this date, no response has been 
received by this office. 

________________________________________________________________
_

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by 
existing law or regulations.

2.  The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the 
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice.  After a 
thorough review of the evidence of record and noting the 
criteria for the VSM and RVNCM, we are not persuaded that he 
meets the eligibility requirements for either of these medals.  
Therefore, other than the administrative correction cited above, 
we find no basis to recommend granting the relief sought in this 
application.

________________________________________________________________
_

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice; the 
application was denied without a personal appearance; and the 
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of 
newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this 
application.

________________________________________________________________
_

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2012-05372 in Executive Session on 22 August 2013, 
under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:


The following documentary evidence pertaining to Docket Number 
BC-2012-05372 was considered:

  Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 16 November 2012, w/atchs.
  Exhibit B.  Applicant’s Master Personnel Records.
  Exhibit C.  Letter, AFPC/DPSID, dated 25 January 2013.
  Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 8 February 2013.
4


3



Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05257

    Original file (BC 2013 05257.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-05257 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be awarded the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal (RVCM). There is no official documentation in the applicant’s official military record verifying he was in the area of eligibility for an aggregate of six months in support of the Vietnam Armed Forces. While the applicant contends that the fact that he was...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-05113

    Original file (BC-2011-05113.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Only members who meet the criteria for the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal (Vietnam) or VSM during the period of service are considered to have contributed direct combat support to the RVN armed forces. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force, which is attached at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSID recommends denial,...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03890

    Original file (BC-2012-03890.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-03890 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His record be corrected to reflect he was awarded the following: a. Vietnam Service Medal (VSM). ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He served in Guam with the 3960th Strategic Wing for 176...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00951

    Original file (BC 2014 00951.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-00951 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to reflect military service in Vietnam. THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to the APPLICANT be corrected to show that he had boots-on-the-ground in the Republic of Vietnam. The following documentary evidence was...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03128

    Original file (BC-2012-03128.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force, which are at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSID recommends denial and states that there is no evidence that supports the applicant’s contention that he served in Vietnam during the inclusive dates for these awards. The complete DPSID evaluation is at Exhibit...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-00846

    Original file (BC-2013-00846.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-00846 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be corrected to reflect his entitlement to the Vietnam Service Medal (VSM). ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He traveled to...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-05385

    Original file (BC-2012-05385.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-05385 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ _ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be awarded the Vietnam Service Medal (VSM). The applicant's complete submission is at Exhibit A. There is no documentation in the applicant’s record to verify he served in the area of eligibility for award of the VSM.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03847

    Original file (BC-2012-03847.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-03847 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Report of Separation from Active Duty, be corrected to reflect award of the Vietnam Service Medal (VSM) and the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal (RVCM). The RVCM is awarded to members of the US armed forces who, during the period 1...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02467

    Original file (BC-2012-02467.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Also, he knows other veterans who served in Thailand during the same time period and were not in-country; yet, they received both medals. Furthermore, his performance report for the inclusive period 1 Oct 74 to 30 Mar 75, reflects he was assigned to Udorn RTAFB, Thailand; however, this time-frame is outside of the closeout period for award of the VSM and RVCM. ________________________________________________________________ _ The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04801

    Original file (BC-2012-04801.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-04801 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Report of Separation from Active Duty, be corrected to reflect his entitlement to the Vietnam Service Medal (VSM) or a Badge reflecting his service during that era. In support of his request the applicant submitted copies of his DD...