Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100026842
Original file (20100026842.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  7 April 2011

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20100026842 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests removal of duplicate orders awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) from his official military personnel file (OMPF).

2.  The applicant states his OMPF contains duplicate orders awarding him the first award of the Army Good Conduct Medal.

3.  The applicant provides:

* Permanent Orders 349-06, dated 15 December 2003
* Permanent Orders 070-08, dated 10 March 2004

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant is a Regular Army (RA) staff sergeant who entered active duty on a 6-year enlistment on 24 January 2001.  He currently holds military occupational specialty 31D (Criminal Investigation Special Agent) and he is assigned to Fort Leonard Wood, MO.

2.  On 15 December 2003, Headquarters, 1st Squadron, 17th Cavalry, Fort Bragg, NC, published Permanent Orders 349-06, awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) for exemplary conduct, efficiency, and fidelity in active Federal military service from 25 January 2001 through 24 January 2004.

3.  On 10 March 2004, the same headquarters, published Permanent Orders 070-08 awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) for exemplary conduct, efficiency, and fidelity in active Federal military service from 24 January 2001 through 23 January 2004.

4.  Both orders are filed in his OMPF.

5.  Army Regulation 600-8-104 (Military Personnel Information Management/
Records) prescribes the policies and mandated operating tasks for the Military Personnel Information Management/Records Program of the Military Personnel System.  Chapter 2 provides detailed guidance and instructions regarding the initiation, composition, maintenance, changing, access to, and transfer of the OMPF.  Table 2-1 shows that award orders (including badges and tabs) are filed in the performance portion of the OMPF.  Paragraph 2-4 contains specific guidance on changing the OMPF.  It provides that the Army Board for Correction of Military Records may direct removal or movement of documents filed in the OMPF in the interest of justice or equity.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The purpose of maintaining the OMPF is to protect the interests of both the U.S. Army and the Soldier.  In this regard, the OMPF serves to maintain an unbroken, historical record of a Soldier's service, conduct, duty performance, and evaluation periods and any corrections to other parts of the OMPF.  Once placed in the OMPF, the document becomes a permanent part of that file and will not be removed from or moved to another part of the OMPF unless directed by an appropriate authority.

2.  The evidence of record shows the applicant was issued two orders awarding him the first award of the Army Good Conduct Medal for the same period of service.  The existence of these two orders is a detractor that stands out as soon as his records are reviewed and may give the appearance that he is neglecting to review his OMPF.  The duplicate orders should be revoked and removed from his OMPF.  Further, extra measures should be taken to ensure the revocation orders are not filed in his OMPF.

BOARD VOTE:

___X____  ___X____  ___X____  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION
BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined the evidence presented is sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by:

	a.  revoking Permanent Orders 349-06 issued by Headquarters,
1st Squadron, 7th Cavalry, Fort Bragg, NC, on 15 December 2003;

	b.  removing Permanent Orders 349-06 from his OMPF; and

	c.  ensuring the revocation orders are not filed in his OMPF.



      __________X______________
                 CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100026842



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100026842



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090011540

    Original file (20090011540.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests removal of the following duplicate documents from his Official Military Personnel File (OMPF): a. duplicate orders awarding him the Good Conduct Medal (2nd Award); b. duplicate orders awarding him the Good Conduct Medal (4th Award); and c. duplicate memoranda, dated 10 August 2003, awarding him the Gold Recruiter Badge with three sapphire achievement stars. The evidence of record shows that the applicant was issued two sets of orders awarding him his second award of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100024781

    Original file (20100024781.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests removal of duplicate orders awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal (2nd Award) from his official military personnel file (OMPF). Both orders are filed in his OMPF. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. revoking Permanent Orders 271-05 issued by Headquarters, 964th Engineer Battalion, Fort Lewis, WA, dated 27 September 2000; b. removing Permanent Orders 271-05 from his OMPF; and c....

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100028983

    Original file (20100028983.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests removal of duplicate orders awarding her the Army Good Conduct Medal (2nd Award) from her official military personnel file (OMPF). The evidence of record shows the applicant was issued two orders awarding her the second award of the Army Good Conduct Medal for the same period of service. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. revoking Permanent Orders 103-09, issued by Charlie...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100022606

    Original file (20100022606.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests removal of duplicate orders awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) from his official military personnel file (OMPF). Paragraph 2-4 contains guidance on changing the OMPF and specifies that the Army Board for Correction of Military Records may direct removal or movement of documents filed in the OMPF in the interest of justice or equity. The evidence of record shows the applicant was issued two orders awarding him the first award of the Army Good Conduct...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100008006

    Original file (20100008006.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests removal from her Official Military Personnel File (OMPF) the duplicate set of orders awarding her the third award of the Good Conduct Medal (GCMDL). There are no orders or other evidence in the applicant's OMPF to show that either of the orders awarding her the GCMDL (3rd Award) were revoked. Therefore, it would be appropriate to revoke the second (duplicate) order that was issued awarding the applicant the GCMDL (3rd Award) for the same period of service.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110001909

    Original file (20110001909.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests removal from his Official Military Personnel File (OMPF) the duplicate set of orders awarding him the first award of the Good Conduct Medal (GCMDL). There are no orders or other evidence in the applicant's OMPF to show that either of the orders awarding him the GCMDL (1st Award) were revoked. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. filing in his OMPF Permanent Orders 026-01, 1st...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100022130

    Original file (20100022130.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The evidence of record shows the applicant was awarded the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) for the period 24 May 2001 to 23 May 2004 under Permanent Orders 210-005, dated 28 July 2004. The evidence of record also shows the applicant was awarded the Army Good Conduct Medal (2nd Award) for the period 24 May 2004 to 23 May 2007 under Permanent Orders 254-07, dated 11 September 2007. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090021439

    Original file (20090021439.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states, in effect, the subject orders awarding her the Army Good Conduct Medal - first and second awards - are incorrect as to the dates or period of service, and she has correct orders in her records for these awards. A Detachment, 516th Personnel Services Battalion, Permanent Orders 26-226, awarded the applicant the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) for the period 27 May 1998 to 26 May 2001. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110019172

    Original file (20110019172.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 1 December 2011 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20110019172 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests his Official Military Personnel File (OMPF) and My Board File (MBF) be corrected by: a. removing the erroneous Alpha Detachment, 90th Personnel Services Battalion Permanent Order (PO) 020-002 awarding him the 5th award of the Army Good Conduct Medal; and b. removing the duplicate Army Good Conduct Medal (8th award), dated 4 December 2010, for the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050009660C070206

    Original file (20050009660C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states, in effect, that a duplicate order awarding him the Good Conduct Medal (Fourth Award) and the corresponding order revoking that order are filed in the performance section of his OMPF and this may give members of a future Command Sergeants Major promotion selection board a false impression that the award was actually taken away from the applicant. The evidence of record confirms that the applicant was properly awarded the Good Conduct Medal (Fourth Award) by permanent...