Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090020787
Original file (20090020787.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  15 July 2010

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20090020787 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, removal of Orders 090-01, dated 31 March 2008, issued by Headquarters, 1st Brigade Combat Team, 82nd Airborne Division, Contingency Operating Base (COB) Adder, Iraq, from his official military personnel file (OMPF).

2.  He states these orders are erroneous.

3.  He provides copies Orders 087-13 and 090-01, a memorandum for record (MFR), and his DA Form 1695 (Oath of Extension of Enlistment).

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  His military records show he enlisted in the Regular Army in pay grade E-2 on 1 December 2004 with prior enlisted service in the Army National Guard.  He reenlisted on 30 March 2006 for 6 years.

2.  Orders 087-13, dated 27 March 2008, issued by Headquarters, 1st Brigade Combat Team, 82nd Airborne Division, COB Adder, Iraq, were published announcing his promotion to sergeant effective 1 April 2008.  His OMPF located on the integrated Personnel Electronic Records Management System (iPERMS) contain a copy of these orders.

3.  Orders 090-01, dated 31 March 2008, issued by Headquarters, 1st Brigade Combat Team, 82nd Airborne Division, COB Adder, were published revoking Orders 087-13, dated 27 March 2008.  His OMPF located on the iPERMS contain a copy of these orders.

4.  In an MFR, dated 2 October 2008, the unit commander, 600th Quartermaster Company (Aerial Equipment Repair and Supply), Fort Bragg, stated the applicant had rescinded orders on his iPERMS.  Orders 087-13, dated 27 March 2008, pertaining to his promotion to sergeant were erroneous and needed to be removed from his files.

5.  He is currently serving on active duty in the rank/grade of sergeant/pay grade E-5.

6.  On 24 June 2010, the unit assistant noncommissioned officer in charge, 5th Psychological Operations Battalion, Fort Bragg, verified he was promoted to sergeant/pay grade E-5 effective 1 March 2008.  

7.  On 24 June 2010, a staff member of the Defense Finance and Accounting Service verified he was being paid in the rank of sergeant effective 1 March 2008.

8.  Army Regulation 600-8-104 (Military Personnel Information Management/
Records) provides policy and procedures for maintenance of a Soldier's personal information.  Paragraph 2-4a states that once placed in the OMPF, a document becomes a permanent part of that file.  The document will not be removed from an OMPF or moved to another part of the OMPF unless directed by, among other agencies, the Army Board for Correction of Military Records or the OMPF custodian when documents have been improperly filed.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The evidence of record shows he was promoted to sergeant and began being paid in that rank effective 1 March 2008.  

2.  On 27 March 2008, Headquarters, 1st Brigade Combat Team, 82nd Airborne Division, COB Adder, issued Orders 087-13 promoting him to sergeant effective 1 April 2008.  On 31 March 2008, the same headquarters issued Orders 090-01 revoking Orders 087-13.

3.  In view of the circumstances in this case, he is not entitled to have Orders 090-01, dated 31 March 2008, revoked and removed from his OMPF.  These accurately show Orders 087-13 were erroneous and needed to be revoked.

4.  Since the preponderance of evidence indicates the applicant was promoted to sergeant effective 1 March 2008, he should ensure a copy of the 1 March 2008 promotion orders are filed in his records.

5.  In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___X____  ____X___  ____X___  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      ___________X_____________
       	     CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090020787



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090020787



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080016622

    Original file (20080016622.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that 801st Brigade Support Battalion [BSB], 4th Brigade Combat Team [BCT] (Currahee), 101st Airborne Division [ABN DIV] (AASLT) [Air Assault], Forward Operating Base [FOB] Sharana, Afghanistan Permanent Orders 165-12, dated 13 June 2008, be removed from her official military personnel file (OMPF) on file in the integrated Personnel Electronic Records Management System (iPERMS). The applicant's military personnel record shows she initially enlisted in the Regular Army...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140014835

    Original file (20140014835.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states: a. the narrative portion of the DA Form 638 (Recommendation for Award) initially recommending him for the LOM is incorrect; b. upon submitting his paperwork for retirement, his detachment commander asked for a copy of all of his officer evaluation reports in order to prepare his retirement award, to which he complied; c. after he read the award recommendation he informed his commander of the errors it contained, at which time, his commander told him it was already...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100018197

    Original file (20100018197.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that his Official Military Personnel File (OMPF) be corrected by: a. removing the following six permanent orders awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal (AGCM): B069-26 for 2d award, B178-51 for 3d award, B178-52 for 4th award, 339-009 for 4th award, 147-39 for 5th award, 320-01 for 6th award; and b. replacing them with the following six orders correcting or showing the correct dates of the award of the AGCM: 167-06 for the 2d award, B178-52 for the 3d award,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090020541

    Original file (20090020541.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 01 June 2010 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20090020541 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests the 19 July 2008 orders for his second award of the Army Good Conduct Medal be removed from his official military personnel file (OMPF). A review of the applicant's performance section of his OMPF and military personnel records jacket on the Personnel Electronic Records Management System revealed a copy of the 19 July 2008 and 30 September 2008 Army...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080019060

    Original file (20080019060.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    On 4 September 2008, Permanent Orders 248-022 were issued by Task Force Duke, 3d Brigade Combat Team, 1st Infantry Division, in Afghanistan which awarded the applicant the CIB effective 1 September 2008. The applicable regulations state that only one award of the CIB is authorized for designated periods and the applicant has been awarded two awards for the same period of authorization. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100018900

    Original file (20100018900.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that a 28 March 2003 DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty); 82nd Soldier Support Battalion Permanent Orders 267-4, dated 24 September 2001; and 313th Military Intelligence Battalion Permanent Orders 271-01, dated 27 September 2004, all be removed from his IPERMS (interactive Personnel Electronic Records Management System) record. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080008304

    Original file (20080008304.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that Permanent Orders Number 84-01 and 84-03 dated 25 March 1999, awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal for the 2nd and 3rd award be removed from his Official Military Personnel File (OMPF). This regulation also provides that once filed such documents become a permanent part of the OMPF and may only be removed by one of several agencies, one of which is the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR). It is evident that the orders which the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150002500

    Original file (20150002500.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 28 April 2015 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20150002500 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant states: a. However, the evidence of record shows: * he was promoted to CW3 effective 1 May 2014 * his CW3 promotion orders were revoked due to an adverse flagging action * the revocation orders are filed in the service folder of his OMPF * the flagging action was removed in June 2014 * he was promoted to CW3 effective 2 July 2014 2.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090020818

    Original file (20090020818.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests removal of the DA Form 2627 (Record of Proceedings Under Article 15, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ)), dated 18 April 2008, an Officer Evaluation Report (OER), for the period 18 August 2007 through 5 May 2008, from his official military personnel file (OMPF). It states application for removal of a DA Form 2627 from a Soldier's OMPF based on an error or injustice will be made to the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR). Neither the applicant...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090021439

    Original file (20090021439.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states, in effect, the subject orders awarding her the Army Good Conduct Medal - first and second awards - are incorrect as to the dates or period of service, and she has correct orders in her records for these awards. A Detachment, 516th Personnel Services Battalion, Permanent Orders 26-226, awarded the applicant the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) for the period 27 May 1998 to 26 May 2001. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the...