Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100018900
Original file (20100018900.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  21 September 2010

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20100018900 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests that a 28 March 2003 DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty); 82nd Soldier Support Battalion Permanent Orders 267-4, dated 24 September 2001; and 313th Military Intelligence Battalion Permanent Orders 271-01, dated 27 September 2004, all be removed from his IPERMS (interactive Personnel Electronic Records Management System) record.

2.  The applicant states he was retained due to "stop loss" after the DD Form 214 was prepared, but before his actual discharge date.  Permanent Orders 267-4 awarded another Soldier the Army Good Conduct Medal, but contained the applicant's social security number (SSN).  Permanent Orders 271-01 cancelled Permanent Orders 267-4, but both ended up filed in his IPERMS record.  The true meaning of those orders is not apparent and might be confusing to someone reviewing his record during the promotion process.  Both should be deleted.

3.  The applicant provides copies of each of the pertinent documents plus Noncommissioned Officer Evaluation Reports (NCOER's), leave and earnings statements (LES's), and reenlistment documents to substantiate his request.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  At the time of his application he was serving on active duty at Fort Bragg, NC.

2.  Various Army-wide messages, including MILPER Message, TAPC-PDT-PM, dated 060853ZDEC01; HQDA, DAPE-MPE, dated 021635ZDEC01; and HQDA, DAPE-MPE, dated 281338ZDEC01, indefinitely precluded officers and enlisted personnel in certain specialties from voluntarily separating from active duty.  Not included in this "stop loss" were mostly Soldiers in the identified specialties who had already commenced transition leave.

3.  The applicant, then a staff sergeant, was to have been discharged on 28 March 2002.  Although the applicant was affected by the "stop loss," the subject DD Form 214 had already been prepared and is filed in his IPERMS record.

4.  The DD Form 214 shows the applicant was discharged on 28 March 2002; however, the LES's the applicant provided show he received a full month's pay in April 2002 and subsequent months.

5.  He continued on uninterrupted active duty and reenlisted in Afghanistan on 27 September 2002.

6.  The applicant's NCOER's for the period October 2001 through May 2002 and June 2002 through May 2003 show continuous assignment with Company D, 313th Military Intelligence Battalion, 82nd Airborne Division.

7.  Orders show he was awarded the Army Good Conduct Medal for the periods 25 February 2000-24 February 2003, 24 February 2003-"25" February 2006, and 26 February 2006-25 February 2009.

8.  Permanent Orders 267-4 issued by the 82nd Soldier Support Battalion awards another Soldier the Army Good Conduct Medal, but contains the applicant's SSN.  The applicant's unit, the 313th Military Intelligence Battalion, issued Permanent Orders 271-01 revoking the former orders.  Both orders are currently filed in the applicant's IPERMS record.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant states he was retained due to "stop loss" after the DD Form 214 was prepared, but before his actual discharge date.  Permanent Orders 267-4 awarded another Soldier the Army Good Conduct Medal, but contained the applicant's SSN.  Permanent Orders 271-01 revoked Permanent Orders 267-4, but both ended up filed in his IPERMS record.  The true meaning of those orders is not apparent and might be confusing to someone reviewing his record during the promotion process.  Both should be deleted.

2.  The 28 March 2002 DD Form 214 did not become effective.  It should be voided but retained in his record for continuity.  There seems less probability of confusion if both that DD Form 214 and this decisional document are conspicuously retained in his records.

3.  This ABCMR Record of Proceedings should be filed in the service portion of the applicant's IPERMS record and utilized as a supporting document to preclude the loss of any authorized benefits.

4.  82nd Soldier Support Battalion Permanent Orders 267-4 awarded the Army Good Conduct Medal to another Soldier, but contained the applicant's SSN and 313th Military Intelligence Battalion Permanent Orders 271-01 revoked Permanent Orders 267-4.  Both orders should be deleted from his IPERMS record.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

____X___  ____X___  ____X___  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1.  The Board determined the evidence presented is sufficient to warrant a recommendation for partial relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by:

	a.  marking all copies the 28 March 2002 DD Form 214, "VOID DUE TO STOP LOSS";

	b.  filing this ABCMR Record of Proceedings in the service portion of the applicant's IPERMS file; and

	c.  deleting 82nd Soldier Support Battalion Permanent Orders 267-4 and 313th Military Intelligence Battalion Permanent Orders 271-01 from his IPERMS record.

2.  The Board further determined the evidence presented is insufficient to warrant a portion of the requested relief.  As a result, the Board recommends denial of so 


much of the application that pertains to deleting the 28 March 2002 DD Form 214 from his IPERMS record.



      _________________________
       	     CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100018900



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100018900



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130017660

    Original file (20130017660.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty), item 8a (Last Duty Assignment and Major Command) to show his unit as Company A vice Company C, 313th Military Intelligence (MI) Battalion, 82nd Airborne Division. He was initially assigned to Headquarters and Service Company, 313th MI Battalion. Item 8a of his DD Form 214 shows the entry "CO C, 313TH FC" indicating he was last assigned to Company C, 313th MI Battalion, Forces Command (FC).

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090020787

    Original file (20090020787.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, removal of Orders 090-01, dated 31 March 2008, issued by Headquarters, 1st Brigade Combat Team, 82nd Airborne Division, Contingency Operating Base (COB) Adder, Iraq, from his official military personnel file (OMPF). The evidence of record shows he was promoted to sergeant and began being paid in that rank effective 1 March 2008. Since the preponderance of evidence indicates the applicant was promoted to sergeant effective 1 March 2008, he should ensure a...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100018042

    Original file (20100018042.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) be corrected to show he was awarded the Army Achievement Medal (AAM) (3rd Award) and retained in service for 142 days for the convenience of the government due to Stop Loss. His ETS date after Stop Loss was 25 March 2008 which indicates term of service was 3 years and 3 months, and other calculations; b. a Memorandum for Record from the 3rd Battalion, 82nd Field Artillery, Forward Operating Base,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110020567

    Original file (20110020567.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests correction of his military records by removing from his official military personnel file (OMPF) the following two orders for the Army Good Conduct Medal (AGCM): * Permanent Orders 049-061, 82nd Paratrooper Support Detachment, dated 18 February 2005 * Orders Number 082-005, 3rd Battalion, 21st Infantry Regiment, dated 23 March 2006 2. __________X______________ CHAIRPERSON I...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140001621

    Original file (20140001621.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) as follows: * Item 4a (Grade, Rate or Rank) and 4b (Pay Grade) as sergeant (SGT)/E-5 instead of specialist (SPC)/E-4 * Item 11 (Primary Specialty) to add the skill qualification identifier (SQI) of "V" (Ranger) and the additional skill identifier (ASI) of B4 (Sniper) * Item 12f (Foreign Service) to add an additional 14 months of foreign service for a total of 21 months of foreign...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100018197

    Original file (20100018197.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that his Official Military Personnel File (OMPF) be corrected by: a. removing the following six permanent orders awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal (AGCM): B069-26 for 2d award, B178-51 for 3d award, B178-52 for 4th award, 339-009 for 4th award, 147-39 for 5th award, 320-01 for 6th award; and b. replacing them with the following six orders correcting or showing the correct dates of the award of the AGCM: 167-06 for the 2d award, B178-52 for the 3d award,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040010514C070208

    Original file (20040010514C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    Permanent Order Number 132-00026, United States Army Intelligence Center and Fort Huachuca, dated 12 May 2003 shows the applicant was awarded the AGCM (2nd Award) for the period 19 May 2000 to 20 May 2003. Permanent Orders Number 152-3, dated 1 June 1999 shows applicant was awarded the AGCM (1st Award) for the period 25 May 1996 to 23 May 1999. Permanent Orders 132-00026, dated 12 May 2003 awarded the applicant the AGCM (2nd Award) for the period 19 May 2000 to 20 May 2003.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140016677

    Original file (20140016677.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant states: * he was part of the 82nd Airborne Division's Rapid Deployment Force, and a member of the 313th Military Intelligence Battalion * he participated in Operation Urgent Fury in 1983 in the U.S. military support of the people of Grenada 3. On 16 December 1985, he reenlisted in the RA and was awarded MOS 17K (Ground Surveillance Radar Crewman).

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 2004099918C070208

    Original file (2004099918C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    "; i. that on 30 September 2001, his [the applicant's] unit was activated under the provisions of Title 10 United States Code and that the AGR position held by Sergeant G was nullified; j. that another staff sergeant was promoted to sergeant first class/pay grade E-7 to replace the retiring sergeant first class and that this promotion created an available staff sergeant squad leader position in his unit; k. that there was a second staff sergeant/pay grade E-6 squad leader position available...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090001000

    Original file (20090001000.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, “HQ/A Company, 510th Personnel Services Battalion” Permanent Orders 343-129, dated 8 December 2004, which awarded him the Army Good Conduct Medal, be removed from his Official Military Personnel File (OMPF) on the integrated Personnel Electronic Records Management System (iPERMS). The applicant contends that the duplicate orders for the award of the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) should be removed from his OMPF in iPERMS. As a result, the Board...