Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060010920
Original file (20060010920.txt) Auto-classification: Denied


RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


	IN THE CASE OF:	  


	BOARD DATE:	  22 March 2007
	DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20060010920 


	I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.  


Mr. Gerard W. Schwartz

Acting Director

Ms. Wanda L. Waller

Analyst


The following members, a quorum, were present:


Ms. Linda Simmons

Chairperson

Mr. John Meixell

Member

Mr. Roland Venable

Member

	The Board considered the following evidence: 

	Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records.

	Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including advisory opinion, if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant, as the widow of a deceased former service member (FSM), requests, in effect, that the records of the FSM be corrected to show he was not discharged by reason of physical disability with severance pay but was retained on active duty. 

2.  The applicant states, in effect, that the FSM was prematurely discharged from the Army and that his death was service connected.  She contends that the FSM did not receive any treatment for mental health [problems] or depression, that he attempted suicide before he was discharged, that he was given mass quantities of narcotics, that he was unsupervised, and that the military allowed him to take his life.  

3.  The applicant provides the FSM’s death certificate; a medication profile; two medical records; a letter, dated 26 June 2006, from the Department of Veterans Affairs (DVA); a DVA Rating Decision, dated 17 April 2006; and a copy of the FSM’s DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty).  

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The FSM was ordered to active duty on 30 January 2003 in support of Operation Enduring Freedom.  He did not serve in an imminent danger pay area. He served as an observation/scout helicopter repairer.     

2.  On 18 April 2005, a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB) diagnosed the FSM with chronic right shoulder pain and chronic back pain with degenerative disk disease which met retention standards.  The MEB recommended referral to a Physical Evaluation Board (PEB).  On 9 May 2005, the FSM agreed with the findings and recommendations.  

3.  On 12 May 2005, an informal PEB found the FSM physically unfit due to chronic right shoulder pain with limited joint motion following a distal clavicular fracture (October 2003), requiring open reduction with internal fixation (February 2004) because of non-union.  The disability description also stated that subsequent hardware removal, September 2004, did not improve pain symptoms; there is no shoulder instability; extensive profile restrictions and restricted shoulder motion (with pain) prevent full duty function; and rated as analogous to degenerative arthritis with loss of joint motion.  The chronic back pain with degenerative disk disease was considered by the PEB and found to be not unfitting and therefore not ratable.  The PEB recommended a combined rating of 10 percent and that the FSM be separated with severance pay.  

4.  The applicant provided a medical record, dated 21 May 2005, which shows the FSM was hospitalized and diagnosed with alcohol intoxication, chronic alcoholism/abuse, suicide attempt, and chronic back, knee, and shoulder pain.  This medical record states that overnight he did well and that he was evaluated by psychiatry and was determined to be stable [enough] to be taken off of one-on-one observation.  It also states that he was given instructions to follow up with the Army Substance Abuse Program and mental health, that options and resources were discussed with him in depth, and that he was discharged to home under the close observation of his wife.   

5.  On 23 May 2005, the FSM concurred with the PEB findings and recommendations and waived a formal hearing.

6.  A DA Form 5893-R (PEBLO [Physical Evaluation Board Liaison Officer] Counseling Checklist/Statement), dated 23 May 2005, shows the FSM was counseled and advised to file a claim with the VA during outprocessing at the Transition Point.  He was also assisted in arranging contact with the VA and Social Security Administration.

7.  On 6 June 2005, the FSM was honorably discharged by reason of physical disability with severance pay.

8.  The FSM died on 24 November 2005 as the result of a self-inflicted shotgun wound of the head.
  
9.  The applicant provided a DVA Rating Decision, dated 17 April 2006, which states that service connection for the cause of the FSM’s death was granted.  This rating decision also states that the FSM’s suicide attempt on 21 May 2005 was reported due to excess financial obligations. 

10.  Army Regulation 635-40 governs the evaluation for physical fitness of Soldiers who may be unfit to perform their military duties because of physical disability.  Paragraph 3-6 of this regulation states that providing definitive medical care to active duty Soldiers requiring prolonged hospitalization who are unlikely to return to active duty is not within the Department of the Army mission.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  Although the applicant contends that the FSM did not receive any treatment for mental health or depression, evidence of record shows that he was counseled and advised to file a claim with the VA during outprocessing at the Transition Point.  He was also assisted in arranging contact with the VA.  In addition, the governing regulation states that providing definitive medical care to active duty Soldiers requiring prolonged hospitalization who are unlikely to return to active duty is not within the Department of the Army mission.

2.  The PEB found the FSM physically unfit due to chronic right shoulder pain on 12 May 2005 and recommended that he be separated with severance pay.  

3.  It is noted that the FSM was hospitalized on 21 May 2005 for suicide attempt and alcohol intoxication.  However, the medical report provided by the applicant shows that the psychiatrist found the FSM to be stable, that he did well overnight, and that his options and resources were discussed at length.

4.  On 23 May 2005, the FSM concurred with the PEB findings and recommendations, waived a formal hearing, and was counseled this date on contacting the DVA.  He was discharged on 6 June 2005.  Almost six months later he committed suicide.      

5.  There is no evidence of record which shows the FSM was eligible for retention on active duty.  Regrettably, there is no basis for granting the applicant’s request.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

LS_____  __JM____  __RV____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



___Linda Simmons______
          CHAIRPERSON




INDEX

CASE ID
AR20060010920
SUFFIX

RECON

DATE BOARDED
20070322
TYPE OF DISCHARGE

DATE OF DISCHARGE

DISCHARGE AUTHORITY

DISCHARGE REASON

BOARD DECISION
DENY
REVIEW AUTHORITY

ISSUES         1.
113.000
2.

3.

4.

5.

6.


Similar Decisions

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD2014 01910

    Original file (PD2014 01910.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The MEB also identified and forwarded two other conditions (high frequency hearing loss and anxiety disorder) for PEB adjudication.The Informal PEBadjudicated left shoulder pain, neck pain and LBPas unfitting, rated 10%, 0% and 0% respectively, with likely application of the VA Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) for the neck and back condition and citing the US Army Physical Disability Agency (USAPDA) pain policy for the shoulder condition. The PEB rated the condition of chronic neck...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD2014 00906

    Original file (PD2014 00906.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The VARD also noted the absence of radicular findings and no recording of ROM (the CI refused testing).The Board directs attention to its rating recommendation based on the above evidence.The PEB rated the condition for ROM limited by pain, coded 5237, and assigned a rating of 0%.The VA rated the condition under code 5242, 10% for muscle spasm.Under the applicable spine rules, a rating of 10% requires cervical spine flexion of greater than 30 degrees but less than 40 degrees or a combined...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-02571

    Original file (PD-2013-02571.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. At a pain managementevaluation on 11 March 2005 the CI reported no upper extremity symptoms and there was reduced cervical ROM with normal strength and TTP of the cervical spine (facet pain), with positive evidence of...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD2011-00780

    Original file (PD2011-00780.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    The PEB adjudicated the multi-directional instability of left (minor) shoulder as unfitting, rated 20% with application of the Veterans Administration Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD). Although medical records later record there was a dislocation, medical records at the time of injury do not record a dislocation and a 19 September 2003 physical therapy appointment recorded that there was no history of dislocation. The CI reported left ankle pain since a sprain in 2002.

  • AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD2011-00219

    Original file (PD2011-00219.docx) Auto-classification: Approved

    I would ask that you request from the Department of Veterans Affairs all rating decisions and accompanying medical information for the degenerative disc disease in my neck and low back as well as the rating decisions for the above listed conditions.” The CI also submitted a letter along with his application to the Physical Disability Board of Review (PDBR) stating the Air Force Physical Evaluation Board had rated his conditions based on incapacitating episodes but that the VA had used the...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD2011-00777

    Original file (PD2011-00777.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    SUMMARY OF CASE : Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was an active duty Petty Officer First Class (E01) / E-6 (5713/Equipment Operator), medically separated for multilevel degenerative disk disease (DDD) of the lumbosacral spine with chronic persisting low back pain (LBP). The PEB adjudicated multilevel DDD of the lumbosacral spine condition as unfitting, rated 20% with application of the Veteran’s Affairs Schedule for Rating...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012-00226

    Original file (PD2012-00226.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) adjudicated the lumbar fusion L2-L3 condition as unfitting, rated 20%, with application of the Veteran’s Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD). Lumbar Fusion L2-L3 Condition . In accordance with reference (a), I have reviewed the cases forwarded by reference (b), and, for the reasons provided in their forwarding memorandum, approve the recommendations of the PDBR that the following individuals’ records not be corrected to reflect a change in...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090007214

    Original file (20090007214.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 30 November 2006, an MEB diagnosed the applicant with cervical spondylosis with radiculopathy status post C4-C5 anterior cervical diskectomy effusion; right shoulder rotator cuff tendonitis, bilateral knee retropatellar pain syndrome, and chronic low back pain. Rated for pain as minimal/frequent. Consequently, due to the two concepts involved, an individual’s medical condition may not be considered to be a physical disability by the Army and yet be rated by the DVA as a disability.

  • AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD2011-00091

    Original file (PD2011-00091.docx) Auto-classification: Approved

    (2) Whether the determination by the PEB that the Veteran's left shoulder pain secondary to acromioclavicular arthritis was unfitting, but rating the condition 0% disabling, was in error because (a) a 10% rating was warranted under the applicable diagnostic code regardless of the extent of limitation of motion, and (b) the VA assigned a 20% rating to the left shoulder disability effective December 15, 2006, concurrent with the Veteran’s separation from the service. Left Shoulder Pain...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-00457

    Original file (PD-2014-00457.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. The shoulder was reviewed and considered by the Board. RECOMMENDATION: The Board, therefore, recommends that there be no re-characterization of the CI’s disability and separation determination.