Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040008143C070208
Original file (20040008143C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Approved



                            RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


      IN THE CASE OF:


      BOARD DATE:        2 August 2005
      DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20040008143


      I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record
of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in
the case of the above-named individual.

|     |Mr. Carl W. S. Chun               |     |Director             |
|     |Mr. G. E. Vandenberg              |     |Analyst              |


      The following members, a quorum, were present:

|     |Mr. William D. Powers             |     |Chairperson          |
|     |Mr. Robert L. Duecaster           |     |Member               |
|     |Ms. Jeanette R. McCants           |     |Member               |

      The Board considered the following evidence:

      Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records.

      Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including advisory opinion,
if any).

THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests that his records be corrected by removing
duplicate orders authorizing award of the third and fourth Good Conduct
Medals and the revocation orders for these duplicate orders.

2.  The applicant provides no argument or contentions beyond his request.

3.  The applicant provides copies of three sets of orders for the Good
Conduct Medal and three sets of orders revoking those orders.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant's record shows that the applicant, currently an active
duty staff sergeant (SSG) (E-6) entered active duty on 21 October 1988.

2.  He was awarded his first and second the Good Conduct Medal for the
periods 21 October 1988 through 20 October 1991 and 21 October 1991 through
20 October 1994 respectively.

3.  On 16 October 1997, 18th Personnel Service Battalion Permanent Orders
Number 000197-003 authorized award of a third Good Conduct Medal, for the
period 21 October 1994 through 20 October 1997.

4.  On 7 September 1999, B Detachment, 556th Personnel Support Battalion
Permanent Orders Number 250-311 also authorized a third award of the Good
Conduct Medal for the period 21 October 1994 through 20 October 1997.

5.  A Company, 1st Battalion, 61st Infantry Regiment Permanent Orders
Number 312-4, dated 8 November 2001, authorized award of a fourth Good
Conduct Medal for the period 21 October 1997 through 20 October 2000.

6.  A Company, 1st Battalion, 61st Infantry Regiment Permanent Orders
Number 71-02, dated 12 March 2002, authorized award of a third Good Conduct
Meal for the period 21 October 1994 through 20 October 1997.

7.  Also on 12 March 2002, A Company, 1st Battalion, 61st Infantry Regiment
Permanent Orders Number 71-02 authorized award of a fourth Good Conduct
Medal for the period 21 October 1997 through 20 October 2000.



8.  On 16 December 2002, E Company, 1st Battalion, 61st Infantry Regiment
issued three sets of orders, Permanent Orders Numbers 350-01, 350-02, and
350-03, revoking the three duplicate sets of orders for award of the third
and fourth Good Conduct Medals.

9.  Headquarters, U. S. Army Forces Central Command – Saudi Arabia
Permanent Orders Number 329-05, dated 25 November 2003, authorized award of
a fifth Good Conduct Medal for the period 21 October 2000 through
20 October 2003.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The error created by duplicate orders was properly resolved by the
issuance of the revocation orders and as such no error currently exists in
the applicant's file.

2.  For historical purposes, the Army has an interest in maintaining the
accuracy of its records.  The information contained therein should reflect
the conditions and circumstances that existed at the time the records were
created.  Therefore, the duplicate award orders and their revocation orders
should be retained in the applicant's military records.

3.  However, the retention of the duplicate orders for the awards and the
orders revoking those orders in his permanent file might create an illusion
that something improper occurred or result in confusion as to correct
periods and dates of award of the Good Conduct Medals.

4.  Therefore, it would be appropriate to remove all of these orders from
his permanent (P) fiche and place them, along with this decisional
document, on a restricted (R) fiche to avoid further confusion.


BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF

__JRM__  _WDP___  __RLD __  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1.  The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to
warrant a recommendation for partial relief.  As a result, the Board
recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual
concerned be corrected by removing B Detachment, 556th Personnel Support
Battalion Permanent Orders Number 250-311; A Company, 1st Battalion, 61st
Infantry Regiment Permanent Orders Numbers 71-01 and 71-02; and B Company,
1st Battalion, 61st Infantry Regiment Permanent Orders Numbers 350-01, 350-
02, and 350-03 from his permanent (P) fiche and placing them, along with
this decisional document, in his restricted (R) fiche.

2.  The Board further determined that the evidence presented is
insufficient to warrant a portion of the requested relief.  As a result,
the Board recommends denial of so much of the application that pertains to
purging his records of the above referenced orders.




                                  __    William D. Powers______
                                            CHAIRPERSON

                                    INDEX

|CASE ID                 |AR20040008143                           |
|SUFFIX                  |                                        |
|RECON                   |                                        |
|DATE BOARDED            |20050802                                |
|TYPE OF DISCHARGE       |                                        |
|DATE OF DISCHARGE       |                                        |
|DISCHARGE AUTHORITY     |                                        |
|DISCHARGE REASON        |                                        |
|BOARD DECISION          |Partial relief                          |
|REVIEW AUTHORITY        |                                        |
|ISSUES         1.       |123.0700                                |
|2.                      |                                        |
|3.                      |                                        |
|4.                      |                                        |
|5.                      |                                        |
|6.                      |                                        |


-----------------------
[pic]


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070018935

    Original file (20070018935.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 31 January 2008 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20070018935 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The applicant requests that Permanent Orders 264-11, Special Troops Battalion, XVIII Airborne Corps, Fort Bragg, North Carolina, dated 21 September 2006, awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal for the same period of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050009660C070206

    Original file (20050009660C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states, in effect, that a duplicate order awarding him the Good Conduct Medal (Fourth Award) and the corresponding order revoking that order are filed in the performance section of his OMPF and this may give members of a future Command Sergeants Major promotion selection board a false impression that the award was actually taken away from the applicant. The evidence of record confirms that the applicant was properly awarded the Good Conduct Medal (Fourth Award) by permanent...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110001909

    Original file (20110001909.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests removal from his Official Military Personnel File (OMPF) the duplicate set of orders awarding him the first award of the Good Conduct Medal (GCMDL). There are no orders or other evidence in the applicant's OMPF to show that either of the orders awarding him the GCMDL (1st Award) were revoked. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. filing in his OMPF Permanent Orders 026-01, 1st...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100008006

    Original file (20100008006.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests removal from her Official Military Personnel File (OMPF) the duplicate set of orders awarding her the third award of the Good Conduct Medal (GCMDL). There are no orders or other evidence in the applicant's OMPF to show that either of the orders awarding her the GCMDL (3rd Award) were revoked. Therefore, it would be appropriate to revoke the second (duplicate) order that was issued awarding the applicant the GCMDL (3rd Award) for the same period of service.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140003404

    Original file (20140003404.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests removal of Headquarters, 35th Engineer Battalion, 1st Engineer Brigade, U.S. Army Engineer School, Permanent Order 336-02, dated 2 December 2013, for award of the Army Good Conduct Medal (AGCM) (3rd Award) from his Army Military Human Resource Record (AMHRR). Army Regulation 600-8-104, appendix B (Documents Authorized for Filing in the Army Military Human Resource Record and/or iPERMS), states award orders will be filed in the performance and service folders of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140011537

    Original file (20140011537.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests the following orders be removed from her official military personnel file (OMPF): a. BRAVO Detachment, 556th Personnel Services Battalion, Permanent Orders 84-317, dated 24 March 2000, for award of the Army Good Conduct Medal (AGCM) for the period 29 January 1997 through 28 January 2000; and b. A review of the applicant's performance section of her OMPF in the interactive Personnel Electronic Records Management System revealed copies of the 24 March 2000 and 18...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090000414

    Original file (20090000414.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests removal of a duplicate order for award of the Good Conduct Medal (2nd Award) from his Official Military Personnel File (OMPF). On 12 December 2008, Task Force Hammer, 62nd Engineer Combat Battalion (Heavy), Forward Operating Base Sharana, Afghanistan, published Permanent Order 347-001, revoking Permanent Orders 119-00237, issued by Headquarters, 10th Mountain Division, Fort Drum on 29 April 1997, that awarded the applicant the Good Conduct Medal (2nd Award) for his...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002082637C070215

    Original file (2002082637C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states that there is an erroneous order on his OMPF for the Good Conduct Medal (GCM), as well as duplicates of the revocation orders for that award. He requests that the erroneous orders for the Good Conduct Medal as well as the associated duplicate revocation orders be removed from his records. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by removing from the applicant’s OMFP Orders 344-0040, dated 10 December 1999, and duplicates of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070018942

    Original file (20070018942.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, that an order awarding her the Good Conduct Medal (GCM) and its subsequent revocation order be removed from her Official Personnel Military File (OPMF). The service start date of 1 October 1996 is the date the applicant enlisted in the Regular Army and this date does not take into consideration the applicant's computed active duty service date which is 18 May 1996. The two award orders are permanent documents, which by regulatory guidance must be filed in...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100023180

    Original file (20100023180.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    He states PO 26-886, dated 26 January 2001, is the appropriate order for the AGCM (2nd Award) that covers the period 2 October 1997 to 1 October 2000. A review of his record shows the following awards are filed in the performance section of his OMPF: a. AGCM (1st Award) for the period 6 October 1994 to 5 October 1997 per PO 029-00014 issued by Headquarters, U.S. Army Signal Center and Fort Gordon, on 29 January 1998; b. AGCM (2nd Award) for the period 2 October 1997 to 1 October 2000 per PO...